Faculty Opinions recommendation of Randomized trial comparing the efficacy between different types of paclitaxel-eluting stents: the comparison of efficacy between COroflex PLEASe ANd Taxus stent (ECO-PLEASANT) randomized controlled trial.

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Cohen ◽  
Kamalkumar Kolappa
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Different Types

scholarly journals Is hip strengthening the best treatment option for females with patellofemoral pain? A randomized controlled trial of three different types of exercises

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 408-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Camargo Saad ◽  
Rodrigo Antunes de Vasconcelos ◽  
Letícia Villani de Oliveira Mancinelli ◽  
Matheus Soares de Barros Munno ◽  
Rogério Ferreira Liporaci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Patellofemoral Pain ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Hip Strengthening

The Effect of Different Types of Monitoring Strategies on Weight Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Obesity ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1490-1498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle R. Jospe ◽  
Melyssa Roy ◽  
Rachel C. Brown ◽  
Sheila M. Williams ◽  
Hamish R. Osborne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Monitoring Strategies ◽  
Different Types

scholarly journals Randomized Controlled Trial of Fosmidomycin-Clindamycin versus Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine in the Treatment of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1869-1871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunny Oyakhirome ◽  
Saadou Issifou ◽  
Peter Pongratz ◽  
Fortune Barondi ◽  
Michael Ramharter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Plasmodium Falciparum ◽  
Oral Dose ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Single Oral Dose ◽  
Uncomplicated Malaria ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
High Degree

ABSTRACT Fosmidomycin-clindamycin therapy given every 12 h for 3 days was compared with a standard single oral dose of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. The two treatments showed comparably good tolerabilities and had an identical high degree of efficacy of 94% in a randomized trial carried out with 105 Gabonese children aged 3 to 14 years with uncomplicated malaria. These antimalarials merit further clinical exploration.

scholarly journals Confounding in Observational Studies Explained

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bikaramjit Mann ◽  
Evan Wood
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Disease Outcomes ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Based Medicine ◽  
The Impact

Practical and ethical constraints mean that many clinical and/or epidemiological questions cannot be answered through the implementation of a randomized controlled trial. Under these circumstances, observational studies are often required to assess relationships between certain exposures and disease outcomes. Unfortunately, observational studies are notoriously vulnerable to the effect of different types of “confounding,” a concept that is often a source of confusion among trainees, clinicians and users of health information. This article discusses the concept of confounding by way of examples and offers a simple guide for assessing the impact of is effects for learners of evidence-based medicine.

Providing objective feedback in supervision in motivational interviewing: results from a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-394
Author(s):  
Maria Beckman ◽  
Lars Forsberg ◽  
Helena Lindqvist ◽  
Ata Ghaderi
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Motivational Interviewing ◽  
Skill Acquisition ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Supervisory Relationship ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Objective Feedback ◽  
Standardized Clients ◽  
Systematic Feedback

AbstractBackground:The effects of the use of objective feedback in supervision on the supervisory relationship and skill acquisition is unknown.Aims:The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different types of objective feedback provided during supervision in motivational interviewing (MI) on: (a) the supervisory relationship, including potential feelings of discomfort/distress, provoked by the supervision sessions, and (b) the supervisees’ skill acquisition.Method:Data were obtained from a MI dissemination study conducted in five county councils across five county councils across Sweden. All 98 practitioners recorded sessions with standardized clients and were randomized to either systematic feedback based on only the behavioral component of a feedback protocol, or systematic feedback based on the entire protocol.Results:The two different ways to provide objective feedback did not negatively affect the supervisory relationship, or provoke discomfort/distress among the supervisees, and the group that received the behavioural component of the feedback protocol performed better on only two of the seven skill measures.Conclusions:Objective feedback does not seem to negatively affect either the supervisor–supervisee working alliance or the supervisees’ supervision experience. The observed differences in MI skill acquisition were small, and constructive replications are needed to ascertain the mode and complexity of feedback that optimizes practitioners’ learning, while minimizing the sense of discomfort and distress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document