Comparison of the effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine on surgeon satisfaction with surgical field visualization and intraoperative bleeding during rhinoplasty

Objective We aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine with remifentanil on hemodynamic stability, surgical field quality, and surgeon satisfaction during rhinoplasty. Methods and materials In this double-blind randomized controlled-trial, 60 participants scheduled for rhinoplasty at the Mother and Child Hospital, Shiraz, Iran, was randomely divided into the dexmedetomidine group (IV infusion of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine over 20 min before induction of anesthesia then 0.6 μg/kg/hr. dexmedetomidine from the time of induction until the end of the operation) or in the the remifentanil group (an infusion rate of 0.25 μg/kg/min from the time of anesthesia induction until the end of the operation). Bleeding volume, surgeon satisfaction, postoperative pain (visual analog scale (VAS)), Level of sedation (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS)), Patient satisfaction, Vital signs & recovery, and the Aldrete Score (used to discharge the patients from recovery) were measured for all participants. Results The patients in the dexmedetomidine group had less bleeding (p = 0.047) and shorter time to return of respiration, extubation, and the postoperative recovery time (p < 0.001). The surgeon satisfaction was higher in the dexmedetomidine group (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.001). VAS scores, intaking paracetamol, and RASS score were significantly lower in the remifentanil group (p < 0.001). SBP, DBP, MAP, and heart rate were lower in dexmedetomidine group. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine was associated with relatively stable hemodynamics, leading to decreased intraoperative bleeding, recovery time, and greater surgeon satisfaction and the level of consciousness in the recovery ward. However, painlessness and patient satisfaction were greater with the use of remifentanil. Trial registration IRCT20141009019470N112.

Implementation of multi-mode nursing insulation program for patients receiving surgery for spine tumor: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background Spinal tumor surgery usually involved long operation time, large area of soft tissue resection and long wound, and was prone to hypothermia during the operation. Therefore, actively promoting insulation and optimizing the intraoperative insulation program have great potential in reducing the incidence of hypothermia and reducing the incidence of postoperative complications. In this study, we compared patients who did not implement multi-mode nursing insulation program (MNIP) with those who implemented MNIP, observing and comparing clinical outcomes, and complications in both groups, with the aim of developing an optimal management plan for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods, respectively. Methods We selected 2 periods of 1 year, before (n = 120 patients) and after MINP implementation (n = 120 patients). Data were collected on patient demographics, operative, perioperative details, temperature changes, anesthesia recovery effect, incidence of postoperative wound infection, length of hospital stay and complications. PS analyses were used for dealing with confounding bias in this retrospective observational study. Results After PS matching, the outcomes of 120 well-balanced pairs of patients were compared (No-MNIP vs MNIP). There was no significant difference concerning the satisfaction survey. The results indicated that the MNIP had better insulation effect at 90 min, 120 min, 150 min after anesthesia induction and after surgery. There were 16 cases of complications in the No-MNIP group and 5 cases in the MNIP group postoperative, which have significant statistical difference. Conclusion In this study, the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia was effectively reduced by adopting the multi-mode insulation scheme, thus reducing the incidence of incision infection and shortening the length of hospital stay of patients.

Effect of Combined Etomidate-Ketamine Anesthesia on Perioperative Electrocardiogram and Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction of Elderly Patients with Rheumatic Heart Valve Disease Undergoing Heart Valve Replacement

Objective. To explore the effect of combined etomidate-ketamine anesthesia on perioperative electrocardiogram (ECG) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) of elderly patients with rheumatic heart valve disease (RHVD) undergoing heart valve replacement. Methods. The data of 100 elderly RHVD patients treated in our hospital from May 2019 to May 2020 were selected for the retrospective analysis, and by adopting the double-blind method, the patients were divided into the ketamine group (n = 50) and the combined group (n = 50) according to the anesthesia methods. During the induction of anesthesia, the patients of the two groups were given a small dose of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) at 5 μg/kg/min continuously via pump injection until the end of surgery, and on this basis, with the same anesthesia measures, those in the combined group were given etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) additionally. The patients’ perioperative ECG indicators, POCD scores, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores were compared between the two groups. Results. Compared with the ketamine group, the combined group presented significantly lower incidence of ST-T wave changes after anesthesia induction and at the time of intubation and skin incision ( P < 0.05 ), significantly lower average magnitude of ST-segment depression after anesthesia induction ( P < 0.001 ), significantly lower average magnitude of ST-segment elevation after anesthesia induction and extubation ( P < 0.001 ), significantly lower POCD incidence (6.%, P < 0.05 ), and significantly better NRS score after surgery ( P < 0.001 ). Conclusion. Combined etomidate-ketamine anesthesia can stabilize the perioperative ECG indicators of elderly RHVD patients undergoing heart valve replacement, improve their postoperative cognitive function, and reduce their pain sensation, which should be promoted and applied in practice.

Preliminary evaluation of SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask airway in airway management for general anesthesia

Background To preliminary evaluate the application of SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask airway in airway management of general anesthesia. Methods We recruited 100 adult patients (ages 18–78 years, male 19, female 81, weight 48–90 kg) with normal predicted airway (Mallampati I ~ II, unrestricted mouth opening, normal head and neck mobility) and ASA I-II who required general anaesthesia. The SaCoVLM™ was inserted after anesthesia induction and connected with the anesthesia machine for ventilation. Our primary outcome was glottic visualization grades. Secondary outcomes included seal pressure, success rate of insertion, intraoperative findings (gastric reflux and contraposition), gastric drainage and 24-h complications after operation. Results The laryngeal inlet was exposed in all the patients and shown on the video after SaCoVLM™ insertion. The status of glottic visualization was classified: grade 1 in 55 cases, grade 2 in 23 cases, grade 3 in 14 cases and grade 4 in 8 cases. The first-time success rate of SaCoVLM™ insertion was 95% (95% CI = 0.887 to 0.984), and the total success rate was 96% (95% CI = 0.901 to 0.989). The sealing pressure of SaCoVLM™ was 34.1 ± 6.2 cmH2O and the gastric drainage were smooth. Only a small number of patients developed mild complications after SaCoVLM™ was removed (such as blood stains on SaCoVLM™ and sore throat). Conclusions The SaCoVLM™ can visualize partial or whole laryngeal inlets during the surgery, with a high success rate, a high sealing pressure and smooth gastroesophageal drainage. SaCoVLM™ could be a promise new effective supraglottic device to airway management during general anesthesia. Trial registration ChiCTR,ChiCTR2000028802.Registered 4 January 2020.

Evaluation of the effect of preoperative anxiety on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and drug consumption in patients who underwent BIS-guided total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery

In our study, the aim was to evaluate the effects of preoperative anxiety measured by Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State (STAI-S) and State-Trait Inventory-Trait (STAI-T) scores on intraoperative hemodynamic stability, drug consumption and recovery in patients who underwent spinal surgery with neurophysiological monitoring and total intravenous anesthesia with bispectral index (BIS) monitoring, without the use of muscle relaxants. Eighty patients with planned spinal surgery and neurophysiological monitoring were included in this prospective observational study. Anxiety scores were recorded by applying Spielberger’s STAI-T and STAI-S scoring questionnaires to all patients included in the study 1 hour before the operation. Age, gender and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores of the patients who were taken to the operating table without premedication were recorded. Before anesthesia induction, standard monitoring including electrocardiography (ECG), noninvasive blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), BIS was applied. The correlation between STAI-T and STAI-S scores with demographic characteristics of patients, preoperative, post-induction, 5th minute, 10th minute, 30th minute, 50th minute, 70th minute, 90th minute heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), SpO2, operation time, recovery time, and total amount of propofol and remifentanil used during the operation were evaluated statistically. A significant negative correlation was observed between STAI-S anxiety scoring and age (p < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was found between the total amount of remifentanil and propofol used with the STAI-S score (p < 0.05). Significant positive correlations were observed between the STAI-S score and the HR value preoperatively, and in the 5th, 30th, 50th, 70th, and 90th minutes (p < 0.05). Our study showed that preoperative anxiety increases intraoperative drug consumption and heart rate. It is of great importance to keep the amount of intraoperative medication at optimal levels, to measure preoperative anxiety, and to eliminate it with multimodal treatments, especially for the accurate detection of neurological damage in patients with neurophysiological monitoring.

Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries

Background and Purpose: Premedication with either oral midazolam or intranasal dexmedetomidine prior to surgery remains less than ideal. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of those two drug regimens would have any beneficial effects on the preoperative sedation and the children’s compliance during anesthesia inhalation induction.Experimental Approach: One hundred thirty-eight children aged 2–6 years were randomly allocated into three groups: Group M with oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg−1, Group D with intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 μg kg−1, and Group M + D with intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg kg−1 plus oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg−1. The primary outcome was the children’s compliance during inhalation induction with sevoflurane. The secondary outcomes included the preoperative sedative effects, behavior scores, parental separation anxiety scores, and the postoperative incidence of emergence agitation and recovery time.Results: Subjects in Group M + D showed higher satisfaction scores of compliance (p = 0.0049) and mask acceptance (MAS) (p = 0.0049) during anesthesia inhalation induction. Subjects in Group M + D had a significantly shorter time than those in Groups M and D to achieve the desired sedation level (p &lt; 0.001) and remained at a higher sedation score in the holding area and up to the anesthesia induction after drug administration (p &lt; 0.001).Conclusion and Implications: We conclude that pediatric patients premedicated with intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg kg−1 plus oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg−1 had significantly improved anesthesia induction compliance, and quicker onset to achieve and maintain a satisfactory level of sedation than those premedicated separately with two drugs. Therefore, the combined premed regimen is a greater choice when we are expecting a higher quality of sedation and a smoother anesthesia induction in children undergoing the surgeries.

Application of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine Combined with General Anesthesia in Anesthesia of Patients with Traumatic Tibiofibular Fractures and Its Effect on the Incidence of Adverse Reactions

Objective. To explore the application of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with general anesthesia in patients with traumatic tibiofibular fractures. Methods. A total of 120 patients with traumatic tibiofibular fractures treated in our hospital (January 2018–January 2021) were selected as the research subjects and equally grouped into group A, group B, group C, and group D according to the dosage of dexmedetomidine. Group B, group C, and group D were pumped with 0.3 μg/kg, 0.5 μg/kg, and 0.8 μg/kg load doses of dexmedetomidine before anesthesia induction, with the same doses for maintenance during surgery. Group A was intravenously pumped with the same amount of normal saline and received tracheal intubation after anesthesia induction, with propofol and remifentanil to maintain general anesthesia during surgery. Results. No notable differences in general data were observed among the groups ( P > 0.05). Ramsay sedation scores of all groups showed a downward trend after drug withdrawal. At 10 min, 30 min, and 60 min, the scores of groups C and D were markedly higher than those of groups A and B ( P < 0.05), and the scores were higher in group D than those in group C ( P < 0.05). The HR changes at each period were close between groups A and B ( P > 0.05). The HRs at T1 and T2 in group C were slightly lower than those in group D ( P > 0.05), and the HRs at T1 in groups A and B were remarkably higher than those in groups C and D, and were higher than those at T0 and T2 ( P < 0.05). The SBP levels of all groups began to rise at T0, peaked at T1, and decreased to a lower level at T2 than that at T0. Moreover, the SBP levels of groups C and D at T1 and T2 were notably lower compared with groups A and B ( P < 0.05). With a lower DBP level in group C than the other three groups at T1, the DBP levels were notably lower in groups C and D than those in groups A and B at T2 ( P < 0.05). With no statistical difference in the MAP levels at T0 among the four groups ( P > 0.05), the MAP levels in group A at T1 and T2 were obviously higher compared with groups C and D ( P < 0.05). The extubation time in group A was notably longer than that that in groups B, C, and D ( P < 0.05), with longer extubation time in group B than that in groups C and D ( P < 0.05). The orientation recovery time in group D was markedly shorter than that in groups A, B, and C ( P < 0.05). The incidence of cognitive dysfunction, chills, and restlessness in groups C and D was notably lower compared with groups A and B ( P < 0.05), with a higher incidence of chills, intraoperative hypotension, and delayed awakening in group D than in group C ( P < 0.05). Conclusion. Dexmedetomidine at doses of 0.5 μg/kg and 0.8 μg/kg has a better effect in the maintenance of general anesthesia for patients with traumatic tibiofibular fractures, with faster orientation recovery, better recovery of postoperative cognitive function, and a lower incidence of adverse reactions. Dexmedetomidine at 0.5 μg/kg is recommended in view of the increased risk of excessive sedation, chills, restlessness, and intraoperative hypotension in patients at 0.8 μg/kg.

Effect of Low-dose Lidocaine on Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumor Resection With Propofol Anesthesia

ObjectTo investigate the effect of low-dose lidocaine on motor evoked potentials (MEP) in patients undergoing intracranial tumor resection with propofol anesthesia.MethodsForty patients undergoing intracranial tumor resection and required MEP monitoring were selected.They were randomly divided into the lidocaine group (Group L, n=20) and control group (Group C, n=20) by computer generated randomization. All patients were given propofol anesthesia under the guidance of bispectral index (BIS).In Group L, lidocaine 1 mg/kg was injected intravenously during anesthesia induction. Then, lidocaine was continuously pumped at the speed of 1 mg/kg·h until the operation start. Group C was given the equal volume of normal saline. Heart rate (HR), mean artery pressure (MAP), and BIS were recorded before anesthesia induction (T0), 2 min after tracheal intubation (T1), 35 min (T2) and 50 min (T3) after anesthesia induction. The amplitude and latency of MEP at T2 and T3, the total dosage of propofol, and adverse events before T3 were recorded.ResultsCompared with Group C, HR and MAP were significantly decreased at T1 in Group L. No significant difference was observed in HR and MAP at T0, T2 and T3 between Group L and Group C. The total dosage of propofol and the incidence of adverse events were significantly lower in Group L than in Group C before T3. There was no significant difference in the amplitude and latency of MEP between the two groups at each time point.ConclusionLow-dose lidocaine has no effect on MEP in patients undergoing intracranial tumor resection. In addition, it increased hemodynamic stability, reduced propofol use, and decreased the incidence of adverse events.

Norepinephrine in Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy during General Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spinal Operation: Determining Effective Infusion Rate to Enhance Postoperative Functions

Background and Objective: Intraoperative hypotension is a common complication in general anesthesia that could result in different serious complications particularly in elderly patients. This Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) aims to determine effective continuous infusion rate of norepinephrine to prevent intraoperative hypotension during spinal surgery under general anesthesia in elderly patients. Methods: This RCT was conducted on elderly patients (n= 108) undergoing general anesthesia for posterior lumbar spinal fusion. The patients were randomly divided into 0.030, 0.060, and 0.090 μg.kg-1.min-1 groups of norepinephrine infusion rates. The outcomes were assessed at entrance to operation room (T0), 15 mins after anesthesia induction (T1), 60 mins following surgery (T2), and immediately after surgery (T3). The intraoperative and postoperative complications and rehabilitation outcomes were comparatively assessed. Results: All three groups significantly reduced the incidence of delayed wound healing (0.030 vs. 0.060 vs. 0.090 μg.kg-1.min-1; 33.3% vs. 10% vs. 10%, P=0.024) and wound infection (26.7% vs. 6.7% vs. 6.7%, P=0.031). Intraoperative total fluid volume and colloids volume in the 0.030 group were significantly higher than 0.060 and 0.090 groups (P=0.005, P=0.003, and P=0.01, respectively). The 0.060 and 0.090 groups significantly increased mean-arterial-pressure than the 0.030 group at T2 and T3. Both 0.060 and 0.090 infusion rates significantly reduced intraoperative hypotension than 0.030 dosage (P=0.01 and P=0.003, respectively). The bradycardia incidence in the 0.090 group was significantly higher than the 0.030 (P=0.026) and 0.060 groups (P=0.038). The 0.060 group decreased the first intake by 1.4 hours (P=0.008) and first flatus by 1.1 hours (P=0.004) and postoperative hospital stay by 1 day (P=0.066). Conclusion: The 0.060 µg·kg-1·min-1 norepinephrine infusion combined with goal-directed fluid therapy exhibited adequate intraoperative management and postoperative outcomes.