Faculty Opinions recommendation of Targeted nanoparticles that mimic immune cells in pain control inducing analgesic and anti-inflammatory actions: a potential novel treatment of acute and chronic pain condition.

Author(s):  
Jyoti Sengupta ◽  
Pradeep Kannampalli
2013 ◽  
Vol 3;16 (3;5) ◽  
pp. E199-E216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Hua

Background: The peripheral immune-derived opioid analgesic pathway has been well established as a novel target in the clinical pain management of a number of painful pathologies, including acute inflammatory pain, neuropathic pain, and rheumatoid arthritis. Objective: Our objective was to engineer targeted nanoparticles that mimic immune cells in peripheral pain control to deliver opioids, in particular loperamide HCl, specifically to peripheral opioid receptors to induce analgesic and anti-inflammatory actions for use in painful inflammatory conditions. This peripheral analgesic system is devoid of central opioid mediated side effects (e.g., respiratory depression, sedation, dependence, tolerance). Study Design: A randomized, double blind, controlled animal trial. Methods: Thirty-six adult male Wistar rats (200 - 250 g) were randomly divided into 6 groups: loperamide HCl-encapsulated anti-ICAM-1 immunoliposomes, naloxone methiodide + loperamide HCl-encapsulated antiICAM-1 immunoliposomes, loperamide HCl-encapsulated liposomes, empty anti-ICAM-1 immunoliposomes, empty liposomes, and loperamide solution. Animals received an intraplantar injection of 150 µL Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA) into the right hindpaw and experiments were performed 5 days post-CFA injection, which corresponded to the peak inflammatory response. All formulations were administered intravenously via tail vein injection. The dose administered was 200 µL, which equated to 0.8 mg of loperamide HCl for the loperamide HCl treatment groups (sub-therapeutic dose). Naloxone methiodide (1 mg/kg) was administered via intraplantar injection, 15 minutes prior to loperamide-encapsulated anti-ICAM-1 immunoliposomes. An investigator blinded to the treatment administered assessed the time course of the antinociceptive and antiinflammatory effects using a paw pressure analgesiometer and plethysmometer, respectively. Biodistribution studies were performed 5 days post-CFA injection with anti-ICAM-1 immunoliposomes and control liposomes via tail vein injection using liquid scintillation counting (LSC). Results: Administration of liposomes loaded with loperamide HCl, and conjugated with antibody to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (anti-ICAM-1), exerted analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects exclusively in peripheral painful inflamed tissue. These targeted nanoparticles produced highly significant analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects over the 48 hour time course studied following intravenous administration in rats with Complete Freund’s Adjuvant-induced inflammation of the paw. All control groups showed no significant antinociceptive or anti-inflammatory effects. Our biodistribution study demonstrated specific localization of the targeted nanoparticles to peripheral inflammatory tissue and no significant uptake into the brain. Limitations: In vivo studies were performed in the well-established rodent model of acute inflammatory pain. We are currently studying this approach in chronic pain models known to have clinical activation of the peripheral immune-derived opioid response. Conclusions: The study presents a novel approach of opioid delivery specifically to injured tissues for pain control. The study also highlights a novel anti-inflammatory role for peripheral opioid targeting, which is of clinical relevance. The potential also exists for the modification of these targeted nanoparticles with other therapeutic compounds for use in other painful conditions. Key words: Pain, inflammation; immune cells, opioids, ICAM-1, loperamide, targeted drug delivery, immunoliposomes


Author(s):  
Lígia Renata Rodrigues Tavares ◽  
Vinícius Pelarin ◽  
Daniela Baptista-de-Souza ◽  
Daniele Pereira Ferrari ◽  
Ricardo Luiz Nunes-de-Souza ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 166 (6) ◽  
pp. 706-720.e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittney P. Ciszek ◽  
Asma A. Khan ◽  
Hong Dang ◽  
Gary D. Slade ◽  
Shad Smith ◽  
...  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3260-3262
Author(s):  
Alberto Herrero Babiloni ◽  
Fernando G Exposto ◽  
Yasmine Bouferguene ◽  
Yuri Costa ◽  
Gilles J Lavigne ◽  
...  

Pain Practice ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-283
Author(s):  
Cesare Bonezzi ◽  
Matteo L.G. Leoni ◽  
Gaetano Terranova

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Lars-Petter Granan

AbstractAs professional health care personnel we are well educated in anatomy, physiology, clinical medicine and so forth. Our patients present with various symptoms and signs that we use this knowledge to diagnose and treat. But sometimes the patient case contradicts our knowledge. Since the patient is the terrain and our knowledge is the map, these patient cases are anomalies that give us the opportunity to update our maps. One such anomaly is how time restricted amnesia can improve or even eradicate an underlying chronic pain condition and eliminate the patient’s dependence on daily opioid consumption. In this short communication I will use amnesia as a starting point to briefly review chronic pain from a learning and memory perspective. I will introduce, for many readers, new concepts like degeneracy and criticality, and together with more familiar concepts like habits and brain network activity, we will end with overarching principles for how chronic pain treatment in general can be crafted and individualized almost independently of the chronic pain condition at hand. This introductory article is followed by a review series that elaborates on the fundamental biological principles for chronic pain, treatment options, and testing the theory with real world data.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-179
Author(s):  
Jatinder Bisla ◽  
Gareth Ambler ◽  
Bernhard Frank ◽  
Sumit Gulati ◽  
Poppy Hocken ◽  
...  

Introduction: Recruitment into trials in rare chronic pain conditions can be challenging, so such trials consequently are underpowered or fail. Methods: Drawing from our experience in conducting, to date, the largest academic trial in a rare chronic pain condition, complex regional pain syndrome, we have identified recruitment and retention strategies for successful trial conduct. Results: We present 13 strategies grouped across the categories of ‘setting the recruitment rate’, ‘networking’, ‘patient information’, ‘trial management’ and ‘patient retention’. Moreover, six recruitment risks are also discussed. A conservative recruitment estimate, based on audits of newly referred patients to the trial centres without taking into account availability of ‘old’ patients or recruitment from outside centres, and assuming a 55% patient refusal rate yielded accurate numbers. Conclusion: Appreciation of these identified recruitment challenges and opportunities may contribute to supporting prospective investigators when they design clinical trials for chronic pain patient population groups where it has been historically difficult to conduct high-quality and robust clinical trials.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Villy Meineche-Schmidt ◽  
Niels-Henrik Jensen ◽  
Per Sjøgren

AbstractBackground and aimThe present study reports on chronic non-cancer patients who were referred to a private pain clinic, according to a waiting time guarantee and treated within one month from referral. Based on evaluation by members of the multidisciplinary staff at our pain clinic a pain management program could be offered individually or as group therapy.MethodsHealth related quality of life, psychometric tests, use of pain medication; socio-economic status and number of consultations in general practice were recorded at referral to the clinic and by postal questionnaires at follow-up 21 months later. The primary treatment outcome (treatment success) was defined as an improvement of at least 40 points in the physical component and/or the mental component of SF-36 from baseline to follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were changes in Beck’s Anxiety Inventory and Beck’s Depression Inventory, use of analgesics, work status and transfer income and number of consultations at the GP’s office due to the chronic pain condition.ResultsA total of 306 patients were included: 141 were treated individually and 165 were treated in groups. At follow-up, data were obtained from 189 patients (62%). Comparing baseline to follow-up data, 62% of group treated patients were treated successfully, compared with 41% of individually treated patients. Anxiety and depression were significantly improved in group treated patients but not in those treated individually. significantly more patients had work income (and less patients transfer income) among group treated, compared with individually treated. At follow-up use of antidepressants and anticonvulsants was increased whereas use of tranquilizers and strong opioids was decreased in all patients. Number of consultations at their GPs due to chronic pain was significantly reduced in all patients.ConclusionsMultidisciplinary treatment in a private pain clinic seems to have a long-term effect in relation to biological, psychological and social aspects of the chronic pain condition. Treatments based on group therapy may offer better results than individual treatment courses.ImplicationsThe effect of group therapy should be explored further.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document