Faculty Opinions recommendation of Adaptive ligand binding by the purine riboswitch in the recognition of guanine and adenine analogs.

Author(s):  
Eric Westhof
Structure ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 857-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunny D. Gilbert ◽  
Francis E. Reyes ◽  
Andrea L. Edwards ◽  
Robert T. Batey

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (20) ◽  
pp. 10931-10941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal M Matyjasik ◽  
Robert T Batey

Abstract A recent bioinformatic analysis of well-characterized classes of riboswitches uncovered subgroups unable to bind to the regulatory molecule of the parental class. Within the guanine/adenine class, seven groups of RNAs were identified that deviate from the consensus sequence at one or more of three positions directly involved purine nucleobase recognition, one of which was validated as a second class of 2′-deoxyguanosine riboswitch (called 2′-dG-II). To understand how 2′-dG-II riboswitches recognize their cognate ligand and how they differ from a previously identified class of 2′-deoxyguanosine binding riboswitches, we have solved the crystal structure of a 2′-dG-II aptamer domain bound to 2′-deoxyguanosine. This structure reveals a global architecture similar to other members of the purine riboswitch family, but contains key differences within the ligand binding core. Defining the 2′-dG-II riboswitches is a two-nucleotide insertion in the three-way junction that promotes novel base-base interactions. Unlike 2′-dG-I riboswitches, the 2′-dG-II class only requires local changes to the ligand binding pocket of the guanine/adenine class to achieve a change in ligand preference. Notably, members of the 2′-dG-II family have variable ability to discriminate between 2′-deoxyguanosine and riboguanosine, suggesting that a subset of 2′-dG-II riboswitches may bind either molecule to regulate gene expression.


2006 ◽  
Vol 359 (3) ◽  
pp. 754-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunny D. Gilbert ◽  
Colby D Stoddard ◽  
Sarah J. Wise ◽  
Robert T. Batey

2013 ◽  
Vol 425 (10) ◽  
pp. 1596-1611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colby D. Stoddard ◽  
Jeremy Widmann ◽  
Jeremiah J. Trausch ◽  
Joan G. Marcano-Velázquez ◽  
Rob Knight ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 476 (21) ◽  
pp. 3141-3159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiru Si ◽  
Can Chen ◽  
Zengfan Wei ◽  
Zhijin Gong ◽  
GuiZhi Li ◽  
...  

Abstract MarR (multiple antibiotic resistance regulator) proteins are a family of transcriptional regulators that is prevalent in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Understanding the physiological and biochemical function of MarR homologs in C. glutamicum has focused on cysteine oxidation-based redox-sensing and substrate metabolism-involving regulators. In this study, we characterized the stress-related ligand-binding functions of the C. glutamicum MarR-type regulator CarR (C. glutamicum antibiotic-responding regulator). We demonstrate that CarR negatively regulates the expression of the carR (ncgl2886)–uspA (ncgl2887) operon and the adjacent, oppositely oriented gene ncgl2885, encoding the hypothetical deacylase DecE. We also show that CarR directly activates transcription of the ncgl2882–ncgl2884 operon, encoding the peptidoglycan synthesis operon (PSO) located upstream of carR in the opposite orientation. The addition of stress-associated ligands such as penicillin and streptomycin induced carR, uspA, decE, and PSO expression in vivo, as well as attenuated binding of CarR to operator DNA in vitro. Importantly, stress response-induced up-regulation of carR, uspA, and PSO gene expression correlated with cell resistance to β-lactam antibiotics and aromatic compounds. Six highly conserved residues in CarR were found to strongly influence its ligand binding and transcriptional regulatory properties. Collectively, the results indicate that the ligand binding of CarR induces its dissociation from the carR–uspA promoter to derepress carR and uspA transcription. Ligand-free CarR also activates PSO expression, which in turn contributes to C. glutamicum stress resistance. The outcomes indicate that the stress response mechanism of CarR in C. glutamicum occurs via ligand-induced conformational changes to the protein, not via cysteine oxidation-based thiol modifications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document