Faculty Opinions recommendation of Efficacy of dehydroepiandrosterone to improve ovarian response in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a meta-analysis.

Author(s):  
Raoul Orvieto
2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amarin Narkwichean ◽  
Walid Maalouf ◽  
Bruce K Campbell ◽  
Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mala Arora ◽  
Mandeep Kaur

ABSTRACT Diminished ovarian reserve predicts diminished ovarian response to stimulation but does not predict cycle fecundity. It has been recently defined by ESHRE, the Bologna's criteria, according to which at least two of the following three features should be present: (1) Age >40 years/any other risk factor for DOR, (2) abnormal ovarian reserve test, i.e. antral follicle count, AMH, (3) poor ovarian response in a previous stimulated cycle, i.e. less than three follicles after standard gonadotropin stimulation. Poor response to maximal stimulation on two previous occasions also defines DOR. The treatment options are limited. Avoiding the GnRH agonist long protocol and stimulation with microdose flare or antagonist protocol yields better results. Adjuvant therapy with LH, DHEAS and growth hormone shows some benefit in improving the oocyte yield. It is advisable to perform ICSI for all obtained oocytes and some advocate assisted hatching. Pregnancy rates are, however, poor and often these patients require ovum donation. Developing tests that will diagnose DOR in a low-risk population will allow women to plan their reproductive careers early. How to cite this article Kaur M, Arora M. Diminished Ovarian Reserve, Causes, Assessment and Management. Int J Infertility Fetal Med 2013;4(2):45-55.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volkan Turan ◽  
Matteo Lambertini ◽  
Dong-Yun Lee ◽  
Erica T Wang ◽  
Florian Clatot ◽  
...  

AbstractPurposeTo determine whether germline BRCA pathogenic variants (gBRCA) are associated with decreased ovarian reserve.Materials and MethodsAn individual patient-data meta-analysis was performed using 5 datasets on 828 evaluable women who were tested for gBRCA. Of those, 250 carried gBRCA while 578 had tested negative and served as controls. Of the women with gBRCA, four centers studied those affected with breast cancer (n=161) and one studied unaffected individuals (n=89). The data were adjusted for the center, age, body mass index, smoking and oral contraceptive pill use before the final analysis. Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels in affected women were drawn before pre-systemic therapy.ResultsMean ages of women with vs. without gBRCA1/2 (34.1± 4.9 vs. 34.3± 4.8 years; p=0.48), and with gBRCA1 vs gBRCA2 (33.7± 4.9 vs. 34.6± 4.8 years; p=0.16) were similar. After the adjustments, women with gBRCA1/2 had significantly lower AMH levels compared to controls (23% lower; 95% CI: 4-38%, p=0.02). When the adjusted analysis was limited to affected women (157 with gBRCA vs. 524 without, after exclusions), the difference persisted (25% lower; CI: 9-38%, p=0.003). The serum AMH levels were lower in women with gBRCA1 (33% lower; CI: 12-49%, p=0.004) but not gBRCA2 compared to controls (7% lower; CI: 31% lower to 26% higher, p=0.64).ConclusionsYoung women with gBRCA pathogenic variants, particularly of those affected and with gBRCA1, have lower serum AMH levels compared to controls. They may need to be preferentially counselled about the possibility of shortened reproductive lifespan due to diminished ovarian reserve.ContextKey objectiveDNA repair deficiency is emerging as a joint mechanism for breast cancer and reproductive aging. Recent studies showed that ovarian reserve maybe lower in women with BRCA pathogenic variants (gBRCA) due to DNA repair deficiency. However, clinical studies using the most sensitive serum ovarian reserve marker Anti-Mullerian-Hormone (AMH) provided mixed results. Given the heterogeneity of the data from clinical studies, we performed an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to determine if gBRCA are associated with lower ovarian reserve.Knowledge generatedgBRCA are associated with diminished ovarian reserve, as determined by serum AMH and this association is restricted to gBRCA1. This finding is firmer for affected women as this IPD meta-analysis predominantly studied those with breast cancer.RelevanceWomen with gBRCA may have shortened reproductive life span due to diminished ovarian reserve and should be proactively counseled for fertility preservation especially if faced with chemotherapy or delaying childbearing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 818-827.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Bunnewell ◽  
Emma R. Honess ◽  
Amar M. Karia ◽  
Stephen D. Keay ◽  
Bassel H. Al Wattar ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Arnanz ◽  
I Elkhatib ◽  
A Bayram ◽  
A El-Damen ◽  
A Abdala ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Do woman with diminished ovarian reserve exhibit poor blastocyst formation and ploidy outcomes, irrespective of age? Summary answer Patients with extreme diminished ovarian reserve (AMH≤0.65ng/ml) have a lower chance to have at least one euploid blastocyst compared to their age-related reference population (AMH=1.3–6.25ng/ml). What is known already AMH is an established marker of the ovarian reserve for predicting ovarian response to ovarian stimulation and it is strongly correlated with female age. However, it has been suggested that AMH is not only a quantitative, but also a qualitative biomarker of oocyte/embryo competence. Previous studies show conflicting outcomes as to whether reduced ovarian reserve per se is associated with decreased oocyte developmental competence, leading to increased aneuploidy rates in embryos independent of the patient’s age. Study design, size, duration A retrospective analysis was performed between March 2017 and July 2020 at ART Fertility Clinics (Abu Dhabi) including all couples that were triggered for final oocyte maturation and planned for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A). Patients were stratified into four age categories [≤30, 31–35, 36–40, >40 years]. For each age category patients were further divided into three AMH groups: ≤0.65ng/ml, 0.65–1.3ng/ml and 1.31–6.25ng/ml (reference group). Participants/materials, setting, methods Trophectoderm biopsy samples were subjected to Next Generation Sequencing. AMH serum levels (ng/ml) were determined using the commercial fully automated Elecsys® (Roche) assay. Patients with a Progesterone rise of > 1.5ng/ml on the day of final oocyte maturation and patients with AMH values >6.25ng/ml were excluded from the analysis. Per patient that was triggered, the chance to have at least one euploid blastocyst in that cycle, was calculated. Main results and the role of chance A total of 1.300 couples were included with an mean maternal age of 35.6±6.2 years, AMH of 2.1 ±1.5ng/ml and body mass index of 27.5±5.0 kg/m2. The chance to have at least one blastocyst biopsied per cycle was affected in all patients with extreme low AMH (≤0.65ng/ml), irrespective of age; ≤30 years: 58.33%–100.00%–94.84% (p < 0.001); 31–35 years: 50.00%–74.55%–95.32% (p < 0.001); 36–40 years: 56.52%–81.93%–92.56% (p < 0.001) and ≥40 years: 38.06%–73.02%–88.24% (p < 0.001), for AMH ≤0.65ng/ml, 0.65–1.3ng/ml and 1.31–6.25ng/ml, respectively. In all age categories, patients with AMH values ≤0.65ng/ml had a significantly reduced probability of having a euploid blastocyst compared to the reference group (1.31–6.25ng/ml). For women ≤30 years the chances of getting a euploid blastocyst decreased from 88.89% (n = 252) to 41.67% (n = 12) (OR 0.01 [0.03–0.30], p < 0.001), for 31–35 years from 88.09% (n = 235) to 43.75% (n = 32) (OR 0.10 [0.05–0.23], p < 0.001), for 36–40 years from 77.67% (n = 215) to 21.74% (n = 69) (OR 0.08 [0.04–0.15], p < 0.001) and among women >40 years from 29.42% (n = 102) to 6.45% (n = 155) (OR 0.16 [0.08–0–36], p < 0.001). Woman within AMH range of 0.65–1.3ng/ml presented the same decreased probability of having a euploid blastocyst only when 31–35 (52.73%, n = 55) or 36–40 years old (56.63%, n = 83) (OR 0.15 [0.08–0.29], p < 0.001 and OR 0.37 [0.22–0.64], p < 0.001, respectively). Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design. Wider implications of the findings: AMH is a clear biomarker of oocyte-embryo competence. Incorporation of AMH-specific counseling recommendations into clinical practice guidelines, could lead to a more informed guidance on cycle ploidy outcomes, rather than age alone. Trial registration number Not applicable


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document