Faculty Opinions recommendation of How Many HIV infections may be averted by targeting primary infection in men who have sex with men? Quantification of changes in transmission-risk behavior, using an individual-based model.

Author(s):  
Simon Portsmouth
Sexual Health ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 146 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Jansson ◽  
Cliff C. Kerr ◽  
David P. Wilson

Introduction The treatment as prevention strategy has gained popularity as a way to reduce the incidence of HIV by suppressing viral load such that transmission risk is decreased. The effectiveness of the strategy also requires early diagnosis. Methods: Informed by data on the influence of diagnosis and treatment on reducing transmission risk, a model simulated the impact of increasing testing and treatment rates on the expected incidence of HIV in Australia under varying assumptions of treatment efficacy and risk compensation. The model utilises Australia’s National HIV Registry data, and simulates disease progression, testing, treatment, transmission and mortality. Results: Decreasing the average time between infection and diagnosis by 30% is expected to reduce population incidence by 12% (~126 cases per year, 95% confidence interval (CI): 82–198). Treatment of all people living with HIV with CD4 counts <500 cells μL–1 is expected to reduce new infections by 30.9% (95% CI: 15.9–37.6%) at 96% efficacy if no risk compensation occurs. The number of infections could increase up to 12.9% (95% CI: 20.1–7.4%) at 26% efficacy if a return to prediagnosis risk levels occur. Conclusion: Treatment as prevention has the potential to prevent HIV infections but its effectiveness depends on the efficacy outside trial settings among men who have sex with men and the level of risk compensation. If antiretroviral therapy has high efficacy, risk compensation will not greatly change the number of infections. If the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy is low, risk compensation could lead to increased infections.


AIDS Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1055-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica F. Magidson ◽  
Katie B. Biello ◽  
Steven A. Safren ◽  
Joshua G. Rosenberger ◽  
David S. Novak ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 676-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Wolitski ◽  
Stephen A. Flores ◽  
Ann O’Leary ◽  
David S. Bimbi ◽  
Cynthia A. Gómez

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 608-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Andres Bedoya ◽  
Mathew J. Mimiaga ◽  
Geetha Beauchamp ◽  
Deborah Donnell ◽  
Kenneth H. Mayer ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 185-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W Purcell ◽  
Jeffrey T Parsons ◽  
Perry N Halkitis ◽  
Yuko Mizuno ◽  
William J Woods

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. e135-e140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Hoenigl ◽  
Susan J Little ◽  
David Grelotti ◽  
Britt Skaathun ◽  
Gabriel A Wagner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Technology has changed the way that men who have sex with men (MSM) seek sex. More than 60% of MSM in the United States use the internet and/or smartphone-based geospatial networking apps to find sex partners. We correlated use of the most popular app (Grindr) with sexual risk and prevention behavior among MSM. Methods A nested cohort study was conducted between September 2018 and June 2019 among MSM receiving community-based human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening in central San Diego. During the testing encounter, participants were surveyed for demographics, substance use, risk behavior (previous 3 months), HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, and Grindr usage. Participants who tested negative for HIV and who were not on PrEP were offered immediate PrEP. Results The study included 1256 MSM, 1090 of whom (86.8%) were not taking PrEP. Overall, 580 of 1256 (46%) participants indicated that they used Grindr in the previous 7 days. Grindr users reported significantly higher risk behavior (greater number of male partners and condomless sex) and were more likely to test positive for chlamydia or gonorrhea (8.6% vs 4.7% of nonusers; P = .005). Grindr users were also more likely to be on PrEP (18.7% vs 8.7% of nonusers; P &lt; .001) and had fewer newly diagnosed HIV infections (9 vs 26 among nonusers; P = .014). Grindr users were also nearly twice as likely as nonusers to initiate PrEP (24.6% vs 14%; P &lt; .001). Conclusions Given the higher risk behavior and greater acceptance of PrEP among MSM who used Grindr, Grindr may provide a useful platform to promote HIV and STI testing and increase PrEP uptake.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document