scholarly journals Faculty Opinions recommendation of Deep Learning for Validating and Estimating Resolution of Cryo-Electron Microscopy Density Maps †.

Author(s):  
Todd Yeates
Molecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todor Avramov ◽  
Dan Vyenielo ◽  
Josue Gomez-Blanco ◽  
Swathi Adinarayanan ◽  
Javier Vargas ◽  
...  

Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is becoming the imaging method of choice for determining protein structures. Many atomic structures have been resolved based on an exponentially growing number of published three-dimensional (3D) high resolution cryo-EM density maps. However, the resolution value claimed for the reconstructed 3D density map has been the topic of scientific debate for many years. The Fourier Shell Correlation (FSC) is the currently accepted cryo-EM resolution measure, but it can be subjective, manipulated, and has its own limitations. In this study, we first propose supervised deep learning methods to extract representative 3D features at high, medium and low resolutions from simulated protein density maps and build classification models that objectively validate resolutions of experimental 3D cryo-EM maps. Specifically, we build classification models based on dense artificial neural network (DNN) and 3D convolutional neural network (3D CNN) architectures. The trained models can classify a given 3D cryo-EM density map into one of three resolution levels: high, medium, low. The preliminary DNN and 3D CNN models achieved 92.73% accuracy and 99.75% accuracy on simulated test maps, respectively. Applying the DNN and 3D CNN models to thirty experimental cryo-EM maps achieved an agreement of 60.0% and 56.7%, respectively, with the author published resolution value of the density maps. We further augment these previous techniques and present preliminary results of a 3D U-Net model for local resolution classification. The model was trained to perform voxel-wise classification of 3D cryo-EM density maps into one of ten resolution classes, instead of a single global resolution value. The U-Net model achieved 88.3% and 94.7% accuracy when evaluated on experimental maps with local resolutions determined by MonoRes and ResMap methods, respectively. Our results suggest deep learning can potentially improve the resolution evaluation process of experimental cryo-EM maps.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Yokoyama ◽  
Tohru Terada ◽  
Kentaro Shimizu ◽  
Kouki Nishikawa ◽  
Daisuke Kozai ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 2644-2650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salim Sazzed ◽  
Peter Scheible ◽  
Maytha Alshammari ◽  
Willy Wriggers ◽  
Jing He

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Gisriel ◽  
Jimin Wang ◽  
Gary W. Brudvig ◽  
Donald A. Bryant

AbstractThe accurate assignment of cofactors in cryo-electron microscopy maps is crucial in determining protein function. This is particularly true for chlorophylls (Chls), for which small structural differences lead to important functional differences. Recent cryo-electron microscopy structures of Chl-containing protein complexes exemplify the difficulties in distinguishing Chl b and Chl f from Chl a. We use these structures as examples to discuss general issues arising from local resolution differences, properties of electrostatic potential maps, and the chemical environment which must be considered to make accurate assignments. We offer suggestions for how to improve the reliability of such assignments.


Molecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eman Alnabati ◽  
Daisuke Kihara

Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has now become a widely used technique for structure determination of macromolecular complexes. For modeling molecular structures from density maps of different resolutions, many algorithms have been developed. These algorithms can be categorized into rigid fitting, flexible fitting, and de novo modeling methods. It is also observed that machine learning (ML) techniques have been increasingly applied following the rapid progress of the ML field. Here, we review these different categories of macromolecule structure modeling methods and discuss their advances over time.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-66
Author(s):  
Guray Kuzu ◽  
Ozlem Keskin ◽  
Ruth Nussinov ◽  
Attila Gursoy

A revised Table 6 and Supporting Information are provided for the article by Kuzuet al.[(2016),Acta Cryst.D72, 1137–1148].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document