scholarly journals Faculty Opinions recommendation of The proteasome 19S cap and its ubiquitin receptors provide a versatile recognition platform for substrates.

Author(s):  
Karin Romisch
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 396 (2) ◽  
pp. 425-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muthukumar Elangovan ◽  
Choongseob Oh ◽  
Lavanya Sukumaran ◽  
Cezary Wójcik ◽  
Yung Joon Yoo

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salinee Jantrapirom ◽  
Luca Lo Piccolo ◽  
Masamitsu Yamaguchi

Ubiquitin-like/ubiquitin-associated proteins (UbL-UbA) are a well-studied family of non-proteasomal ubiquitin receptors that are evolutionarily conserved across species. Members of this non-homogenous family facilitate and support proteasomal activity by promoting different effects on proteostasis but exhibit diverse extra-proteasomal activities. Dysfunctional UbL-UbA proteins render cells, particularly neurons, more susceptible to stressors or aging and may cause earlier neurodegeneration. In this review, we summarized the properties and functions of UbL-UbA family members identified to date, with an emphasis on new findings obtained using Drosophila models showing a direct or indirect role in some neurodegenerative diseases.


2008 ◽  
Vol 414 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen H. Ventii ◽  
Keith D. Wilkinson

Protein modification by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like molecules is a critical regulatory process. Like most regulated protein modifications, ubiquitination is reversible. Deubiquitination, the reversal of ubiquitination, is quickly being recognized as an important regulatory strategy. Nearly one hundred human DUBs (deubiquitinating enzymes) in five different gene families oppose the action of several hundred ubiquitin ligases, suggesting that both ubiquitination and its reversal are highly regulated and specific processes. It has long been recognized that ubiquitin ligases are modular enzyme systems that often depend on scaffolds and adaptors to deliver substrates to the catalytically active macromolecular complex. Although many DUBs bind ubiquitin with reasonable affinities (in the nM to μM range), a larger number have little affinity but exhibit robust catalytic capability. Thus it is apparent that these DUBs must acquire their substrates by binding the target protein in a conjugate or by associating with other macromolecular complexes. We would then expect that a study of protein partners of DUBs would reveal a variety of substrates, scaffolds, adaptors and ubiquitin receptors. In the present review we suggest that, like ligases, much of the regulation and specificity of deubiquitination arises from the association of DUBs with these protein partners.


2007 ◽  
Vol 369 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Kang ◽  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Jeffrey W. Lary ◽  
James L. Cole ◽  
Kylie J. Walters
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 649-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuancheng Peng ◽  
Liangliang Chen ◽  
Yaru Lu ◽  
Yingbao Wu ◽  
Jack Dumenil ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 479 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Minh Ho ◽  
Ambarnil Ghosh ◽  
Truc Kim ◽  
Sun Il Yun ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pier Paolo Di Fiore ◽  
Simona Polo ◽  
Kay Hofmann
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher E. Bragança ◽  
Daniel A. Kraut

ABSTRACTThe Ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is the canonical pathway for protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) is frequently used as a reporter in proteasomal degradation assays. However, there are multiple variants of GFP in use, and these variants have different stabilities. We previously found that the proteasome’s ability to unfold and degrade substrates is enhanced by polyubiquitin chains on the substrate, and that proteasomal ubiquitin receptors mediate this activation. Herein we investigate how the fate of GFP variants of differing stabilities is determined by the mode of targeting to the proteasome. We compared two targeting systems: linear Ub4 degrons and the UBL domain from yeast Rad23, both of which are commonly used in degradation experiments. Surprisingly, the UBL degron allows for degradation of the most stable sGFP-containing substrates, while the Ub4 degron does not. Destabilizing the GFP by circular permutation allows degradation with either targeting signal, indicating that domain stability and mode of targeting combine to determine substrate fate. Finally, we show that the ubiquitin receptor Rpn13 is primarily responsible for the enhanced ability of the proteasome to degrade stable UBL-tagged substrates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document