scholarly journals Grouping Sunflower Lines in Terms of Iron Nutrition Capabilities and Determining the Best Iron Nutrition Characteristics of These Lines

Author(s):  
Ahmet KORKMAZ ◽  
Güney AKINOĞLU ◽  
Elif BOZ
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 2011-2013
Author(s):  
Janneke Balk ◽  
Nicolaus von Wirén ◽  
Sebastien Thomine

1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (4-7) ◽  
pp. 233-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. B. Vose
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 360-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. Jadhav ◽  
N. V. Thaker ◽  
A. Desai
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan J. Fairweather-Tait

Fe homeostasis is considered in the context of the UK diet, using information on Fe intake and status from the National Diet and Nutrition Surveys. The importance of assessing Fe availability rather than total Fe intake is discussed. Dietary and host-related factors that determine Fe bioavailability (Fe utilised for Hb production) are reviewed using information from single-meal studies. When adaptive responses are taken into consideration, foods associated with higher Fe status include meat (haem-Fe and the ‘meat factor’) and fruits and fruit juice (vitamin C). Foods that may have a negative impact include dairy products (Ca), high-fibre foods (phytate) and tea and coffee (polyphenols), but the effects are more apparent in groups with marginal Fe deficiency, such as women of childbearing age. Analysis of dietary intake data on a meal-by-meal basis is needed to predict the influence of changing dietary patterns on Fe nutrition in the UK. Current information suggests that in the UK Fe deficiency is a greater problem than Fe overload.


Nature ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 202 (4938) ◽  
pp. 1235-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. WILMAR ◽  
A. C. HILDEBRANDT ◽  
A. J. RIKER

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1266-1273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Tao ◽  
David L Pelletier ◽  
Dennis D Miller

AbstractObjectiveTo quantify the potential effect of iron defortification in the USA on iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA).MethodsMonte Carlo models were built to simulate iron nutrition in the US population. A hypothetical cohort of 15 000 persons from the general population was used in 15-year simulations to compare the prevalence of IDA with and without fortification.ResultsWith iron fortification, the prevalence of IDA was 2.4% for children aged 3–5 years, 5.4% for women aged 20–49 years, and 0.14% for men aged 20–49 years. The corresponding IDA estimates under iron defortification were 4.5%, 8.2% and 0.46%, respectively. Defortification had little effect on the distribution of iron indicators at or above the 50th percentile within each of these three groups and little effect on the distributions of iron indicators among adult men.ConclusionIron defortification is likely to increase IDA among children and women of reproductive age, but is not likely to have meaningful effects on the iron status of men or the majority of women and children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document