scholarly journals The effect of posterior vitreous detachment induced by intravitreal injections on macular edema with retinal vein occlusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Dorukcan Akincioglu ◽  
Murat Kucukevcilioglu ◽  
Ali Hakan Durukan
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Posterior Vitreous Detachment ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Vitreous Detachment ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Treatment Naïve

Introduction: To evaluate whether posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) improves treatment outcomes.Methods:The medical records of  treatment-naive patients followed up for a minimum of six months due to retinal vein occlusion between January 2007 and January 2016 were reviewed. Patients with initial PVD were excluded. Correlation analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were used to determine the relationship between categorical variables and treatment outcomes. A subgroup analysis (steroids vs anti-VEGFs) was also performed.Results: The study included 95 eyes of 95 patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. Patients in both groups [central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)] were similar in terms of demographic data and showed similar improvement during the study. The patients who underwent intravitreal steroid injection (IVD or IVTA) were 12.35 times (95% CI: 4.03-37.85) more likely to develop PVD. The patients in steroid group had a statistically significantly high correlation with visual and anatomic improvements, especially after 5 months of follow-up. The median time of PVD was 5 months (2-11).Conclusion: Commonly used drugs in intravitreal pharmacotherapy induce PVD, which plays an important role for the treatment of underlying macular edema.

scholarly journals Relationship between metamorphopsia and inner retinal microstructure following intravitreal ranibizumab injection for branch retinal vein occlusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimi Sugiura ◽  
Fumiki Okamoto ◽  
Tomoya Murakami ◽  
Shohei Morikawa ◽  
Takahiro Hiraoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Number Of Injections

AbstractTo evaluate the effects of intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) on metamorphopsia in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and to assess the relationship between metamorphopsia and inner retinal microstructure and other factors. Thirty-three treatment-naïve eyes of 33 patients with macular edema caused by BRVO with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. The degree of metamorphopsia was quantified using the M-CHARTS. Retinal microstructure was assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) at the first month after resolution of the macular edema (early DRIL) and at 12 months after treatment (after DRIL) was studied. Central retinal thickness (CRT), and status of the external limiting membrane as well as ellipsoid zone were also evaluated. IVR treatment significantly improved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CRT, but the mean metamorphopsia score did not improve even after 12 months. Post-treatment metamorphopsia scores showed a significant correlation with pre-treatment metamorphopsia scores (P < 0.005), the extent of early DRIL (P < 0.05) and after DRIL (P < 0.05), and the number of injections (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the post-treatment mean metamorphopsia score was significantly correlated with the pre-treatment mean metamorphopsia score (P < 0.05). IVR treatment significantly improved BCVA and CRT, but not metamorphopsia. Post-treatment metamorphopsia scores were significantly associated with pre-treatment metamorphopsia scores, the extent of DRIL, and the number of injections. Prognostic factor of metamorphopsia was the degree of pre-treatment metamorphopsia.

scholarly journals BEVACIZUMAB FOR RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Radotma Silitonga ◽  
Sindy Boru Sembiring ◽  
Christina Josephina Bangun ◽  
Heri Purwoko
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) caused sudden visual decrease that most often treatable. This paper aims to describe clinical characteristic and outcome using bevacizumab for macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion in real-life practice. Methods: This retrospective study included 91 treatment-naïve eyes with macular edema due to CRVO (55 eyes) and BRVO (36 eyes), who were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in pro re nata (PRN) regimen. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) before and after treatment were evaluated. Result: The mean age of patients was 60.3 + 11.2 years for CRVO and 55.7 + 8.2 years for BRVO. The mean baseline BCVA in the CRVO group was 1.41 + 0.55 logMAR. There was statistically significant improvement in BCVA after intravitreal bevacizumab compared to baseline (p < 0.001) in CRVO and BRVO group. Twenty six (47.3%) eyes with CRVO had BCVA > 1.0 logMAR (Snellen 20/200) at the last follow-up. In the BRVO group, the mean baseline BCVA was 0.93 + 0.48 logMAR. At the end of the follow up, 19 eyes (52.8%) with BRVO had BCVA > 0.3 logMAR (Snellen 20/40). There was also statistically significant improvement in CMT between all time points and baseline (p < 0.001) in both groups. At the end of the follow up, 26 (47.3%) eyes with CRVO and 25 eyes (69.4%) in BRVO group presented resolution of macular edema (CMT < 300). Conclusion: Intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in significant anatomical and functional improvement in macular edema associated with CRVO and BRVO, although outcome in CRVO group was sub-optimal.

scholarly journals Effect of Alternate Treatment with Intravitreal Corticosteroid and Anti-VEGF for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Young Hwan Bae ◽  
Seong Mi Kim ◽  
Jin Young Kim ◽  
So Hyun Bae ◽  
Hakyoung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose. To evaluate whether treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections alternately can improve treatment outcomes of macular edema (ME) caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods. This dual-center retrospective study included 112 eyes with treatment-naïve ME secondary to RVO that were alternately treated with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections (33 eyes, alternate group) or treated only with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (79 eyes, anti-VEGF group) on a pro re nata basis. Results. During the 12-month follow-up period, the alternate group achieved a visual acuity gain of 0.39 logMAR, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a gain of 0.21 logMAR ( P = 0.042 ). The alternate group demonstrated a reduction in the central macular thickness of 229.9-μm, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a reduction of 220.1 μm ( P = 0.887 ). The alternate group required an average of 5.2 injections, while the anti-VEGF received 4.2 injections ( P < 0.001 ). In a propensity score-matched cohort to compensate for the differences in the injection numbers between the two groups, the alternate group achieved a better visual acuity gain than the anti-VEGF group at month 12 (0.39 logMAR vs. 0.17 logMAR, P = 0.048 ). Conclusions. In ME secondary to RVO, treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections alternately resulted in a more favorable visual outcome compared with intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy.

Management of branch retinal vein occlusion with vitrectomy and arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy, the possible role of surgical posterior vitreous detachment

2003 ◽  
Vol 242 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Charbonnel ◽  
Agnès Glacet-Bernard ◽  
Jean-François Korobelnik ◽  
Emilienne Nyouma-Moune ◽  
Constantin J. Pournaras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Posterior Vitreous Detachment ◽  
Vitreous Detachment ◽  
Vein Occlusion

scholarly journals The randomized ZIPANGU trial of ranibizumab and adjunct laser for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion in treatment-naïve patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshinori Murata ◽  
Mineo Kondo ◽  
Makoto Inoue ◽  
Shintaro Nakao ◽  
Rie Osaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Short Pulse ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Short Pulse Laser ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

AbstractThe ZIPANGU study assessed the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab as a one loading dose + pro re nata (one + PRN) regimen with/without focal/grid laser among treatment-naïve patients suffering from macular edema (ME) following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). ZIPANGU was a phase IV, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, 12-month, two-arm, multicenter study. Treatment-naïve patients with visual impairment (19–73 letters) caused by ME, defined as central subfield thickness (CSFT) > 300 µm, due to BRVO were randomly assigned to ranibizumab monotherapy (n = 29) or combination therapy (ranibizumab + focal/grid short-pulse laser, n = 30). The primary endpoint was the number of ranibizumab injections. Secondary endpoints were mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CSFT, and safety. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean number of ranibizumab injections between monotherapy (4.3 injections) vs. combination (4.1 injections) therapy, or in CSFT. BCVA improvement in the monotherapy arm (22.0 letters) was better than the combination therapy arm (15.0 letters) (p = 0.035). Overall, both regimens appeared to be safe and well tolerated. One + PRN ranibizumab is safe and efficacious in treatment-naïve patients with ME secondary to BRVO. A conjunctive laser treatment did not lead to better functional outcomes or fewer ranibizumab injections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document