scholarly journals Benefits of Enterprise Risk Management: A Systematic Review of Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-35
Author(s):  
Sankalp Naik ◽  
Ch V V S N V Prasad

Objective: In an enhanced climate of risk complexities, the firm's stakeholders desire a risk management framework that promises the benefits of efficiencies, transparencies, and solutions for interrelated risks. Enterprise risk management (ERM) is widely seen as a suitable instrument to address these issues. However, not all are convinced of ERM's benefits. This necessitates a review of extant literature and collating it to generate interrelated insights. This paper reviews articles on ERM from the management and finance domain and catalogs the benefits of ERM. Methodology/Technique: This paper reviews 129 articles addressing ERM benefits. It examines the academic disciplines of journals publishing ERM studies by looking into their H Indices, SJR scores, and ABDC rankings to assess ERM's impact and acceptability among scholars. The research articles are analyzed for their subject domains, geographic scope, and methodology used in exploring the relationship between ERM adoption and its benefits to the firm. Collating and reviewing these articles enables the mitigation of data gaps. These studies were primarily from accounting, finance, management, corporate governance, and strategy domains. Findings: Improved cost-effectiveness, earnings stability, increased profitability, improved decision making, better risk communication, competitive advantage, better resource allocation, enhanced firm value, and performance are the key benefits of ERM adoption identified in this study. A knowledge gap is presented around assessing ERM benefits and extending ERM research scope to developing countries like India. Novelty: The study catalogs the benefits of ERM and makes a strong case for ERM adoption among firms. Type of Paper: Review JEL Classification: M10, M14, G30, G32 Keywords: Enterprise risk management (ERM); firm value; firm performance; ERM benefits; Covid19 Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Naik, S; Prasad, Ch.V.V.S.N.V. (2021). Benefits of Enterprise Risk Management: A Systematic Review of Literature, Journal of Finance and Banking Review, 5 (4): 28 – 35. https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2021.5.4(3)

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Soliman ◽  
Mukhtar Adam

This study investigates how the implementation of Enterprise Risk Management program affects the performance of firms using an Enterprise Risk Management model for the banking sector and an integrated model for measuring Enterprise Risk Management index used in the study by Mukhtar and Soliman (2016). Ten listed commercial banks were selected with the Enterprise Risk Management index as the main independent variable, with Return on Average Equity (ROAE), Share Price Return (SPR) and Firm Value (FV) used as three separate dependent variables. The study provides strong evidence of a positive relationship between Enterprise Risk Management implementation and performance in the Nigerian banking sector. The findings and conclusions of this study are consistent with those of other studies that used data from different industries, providing a basis from which to generalize the findings from this study to firms in other industries.


GIS Business ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-28
Author(s):  
Nouman Nasir

This research examines the effect of enterprise risk management on firm value in Pakistan. Further, this study empirically examines company characteristics that establish the execution of an enterprise risk management system. Using a sample of final dataset of 83 non-financial firms located in Pakistan. The sample included non-financial firms from the year 1999 to 2015 and so up to seventeen observation years per company. As in context of Pakistan, most of the organizations are already implement an ERM programs and establish specialized ERM departments because the ERM is now a global term and has become increasingly relevant because of the growing difficulty of risk and an additional development of regulatory frame works. For the empirical evidences, data collected from non-financial firms listed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Results of logistic regression shows that Capital Opacity, Profitability, Financial Leverage, Firm Size and Slack have positive impact on the implementation of an ERM system but Industrial diversification, Industry and Return on Equity are negatively related to an ERM engagement. The results of ordinary least square regression finds positive relationship between use of an ERM and firm value.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda Yolanda ◽  
Ihyaul Ulum ◽  
Setu Setyawan

This paper aims to examine the effect of corporate value on investor reactions with enterprise risk management (ERM) and intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) as a mediation variable on Indonesian companies listed in the Jakarta Islamic Index in 2016. The sample of this study consists of 25 companies with purposive sampling technique. Five ways numerical coding system and Partial Least Square (PLS) are used as a tool to perform data analysis. The results show that firm value has a significant influence on investor reaction. Unlike the ERM capable of mediating the relationship between corporate value and investor reactions, ICD is unable to mediate.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dihin Septyanto ◽  
Ikhwan Maulid Nugraha

The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of enterprise risk management (ERM) disclosure, leverage, firm size and profitability on firm value, which is proxied by Tobin’s Q. High corporate value can reflect the shareholders’ wealth. This study used the Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD). The sample included 32 companies, chosen with nonprobability purposive sampling. This study used a quantitative approach with descriptive analysis methods and panel data regression to test hypotheses using the Eviews 10 application. ERM disclosure, leverage and profitability had a positive and significant influence on firm value, while firm size had a negative influence on firm value. The implication of this research is that where ERM has a positive influence on firm value, it is good for companies to increase ERM disclosure, because the company will be considered to have managed its risks well. Debt policy variables that are proxied by the Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) and profitability proxied by ROA had a positive effect on firm value. That is, a higher value of DER was followed by an increase in the percentage of Return On Assets (ROA), which increased the firm’s value. However, the company’s size variable which was proxied by Ln Total Assets had a negative effect on the value of the company, which indicated that investors dislike company assets that are too high and that are not offset by high profits. Keywords: enterprise risk management, leverage, firm size, profitability, firm value


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 687-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliano Rodrigues Silva ◽  
Aldy Fernandes da Silva ◽  
Betty Lilian Chan

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iswajuni Iswajuni ◽  
Arina Manasikana ◽  
Soegeng Soetedjo

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the effect of enterprise risk management (ERM) with firm size, ROA and managerial ownership as control variables on firm value that is proxied by Tobin’s Q. Design/methodology/approach Population of this research was manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2010–2013. The used method in this research is multiple linear regression-ordinary least square and hypotheses testing using t-test to test the regression coefficients with level of significance of 5 percent. Findings The results showed that ERM, ROA and size of the company have a significant positive effect on the firm value. While the managerial ownership has a significant negative effect on the firm value. Originality/value The results showed that firm value increases as ERM, ROA and size of the company improves. While the managerial ownership has a significant negative effect on the firm value.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-138
Author(s):  
Alaa M. Soliman ◽  
Adam Mukhtar ◽  
Moade F. Shubita

This study investigates the relationship between Enterprise Risk Management adoption and implementation, and the performance of banks using a sample of four out of the seven Strategically Important Banks (SIB) listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange covering the period from 2005 q1 to 2015 q2. In this study, we determined a measure for Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) adoption or implementation (ERM index) using an integrated Enterprise Risk Management measurement model for the banking sector suggested by Soliman and Mukhtar (2017). A time series Johansen’s cointegration test was used to obtain evidence of the long-term association between ERM and performance, while Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) analysis was performed to gather evidence of causality relationship between ERM and performance. Finally, Generalized Impulse Response Function was used to obtain evidence of how performance responds to the introduction of a shock on Enterprise Risk Management. This study makes significant contributions to the existing body of knowledge, as it yields the first Enterprise Risk Management-performance-based empirical results that indicate a long-term relationship, causation effects, in addition to responding to performance ERM.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
LINDA SANTIOSO ◽  
NURAINUN BANGUN ◽  
YUNIARWATI YUNIARWATI

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of profitability, enterprise risk management and corporate social responsibility on firm value. The sample of this research limited to manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2013-2015. This research uses 150 data with 50 companies selected per year. Analysis tool used multiple linear regression of SPSS 21.00. The dependent variable on this research is firm value, and the independent variable returns on equity, enterprise risk management, and corporate social responsibility. The result showed that return on equity and enterprise risk management affect the firm value, while corporate social responsibility has no effect on firm value.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document