Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Postmeningitis Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss at Rajavithi Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-263
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Language Status ◽  
Auditory Performance ◽  
Electrode Insertion ◽  
One Year

Background: Bacterial meningitis is one of the major factors in the etiology of acquired sensorineural hearing loss in children and adults. Cochlear implantation in these patients is challenging because of inner ear ossification and fibrosis, and this procedure sometimes achieves poorer outcomes in this scenario than with other causes of sensorineural hearing loss. There has been little research into the factors affecting the outcomes of this procedure. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with postmeningitis profound sensorineural hearing loss and to evaluate the factors that affect the results. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of thirty patients who were diagnosed with post meningitis profound hearing loss and underwent cochlear implantation at Rajavithi Hospital between 2001 and 2016. Preoperative language status, duration of deafness, preoperative imaging, and degree of electrode insertion were recorded. Categories of auditory performance-II test (CAP-II) was evaluated in all cases, one year postoperative. Results: Thirty postmeningitis deafness patients underwent cochlear implantation. The median age at diagnosis of meningitis and age at implantation were 41 years (range 1 to 75) and 49.50 years (range 3 to 75), respectively. The median duration of deafness was 12 months (range 4 to 300), and the overall mean CAP-II at one year after surgery was 5.47±2.21. The postlinguistic group had a significantly higher CAP-II score than the prelinguistic one (p=0.006). Electrodes were successfully totally inserted in 19 patients (63.3%) and partially inserted in 11 (36.7%). The average CAP-II score in the group with fully-inserted electrodes was significantly higher than in the group with partially-inserted electrodes (p=0.045). There was no correlation between CAP-II score and age at meningitis diagnosis (p=0.069), age at time of surgery (p=0.105), duration of deafness (p=0.506), or preoperative CT (p=0.228) or MRI abnormality (p=0.078). Conclusion: Cochlear implantation in patients with postmeningitis profound hearing loss had high success rates and favorable outcomes. Preoperative language status and degree of electrode insertion were factors that affected auditory performance results. Keywords: Cochlear implantation, Postmeningitis hearing loss, Sensorineural hearing loss, Meningitis, Rajavithi Hospital

scholarly journals A case report of cochlear implantation in patients with osteopetrosis: surgical approaches and auditory results

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Motasaddi Zarandy ◽  
Hakima Abdullah ◽  
Mina Motasaddi Zarandy ◽  
Mohammadreza Firouzifar ◽  
Farzad Moubedshahi
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Nerve Dysfunction ◽  
Electrode Insertion ◽  
Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
The Right

Background: Osteopetrosis (OP) is a rare disease of the skeletal system that can be associated with complications such as bone fracture, nerve dysfunction and deafness due to increased bone density and reduced bone quality. In this regard and due to the challenge that it can cause for cochlear implantation (CI), in this study we aimed to report CI conducted on two patients with OP in Iran. The Case: Patients were two women diagnosed with OP and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who underwent CI in the right ear. Preoperative PTA showed a hearing threshold decrease of more than 100 dB in both patients. A standard cochleostomy was performed in one patient and endoscopic surgery in the other patient through the external ear canal. One month after surgery, the hearing threshold improved b y 60−90 dB in both patients. No facial nerve palsy or implant extrusion/migration was observed after surgery. Conclusion: Although technically challenging, CI seems to be a safe and effective method to improve the SNHL in patients with OP. The path for electrode insertion should be tailored to meet the conditions and anatomy of patients. Keywords: Cochlear implantation; osteopetrosis; sensorineural hearing loss

Cochlear implantation in cochlear otosclerosis patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 84-92
Author(s):  
V. E. Kuzovko ◽  
◽  
A. S. Lilenko ◽  
S. B. Sugarova ◽  
S. V. Lilenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
Metabolic Changes ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Bony Labyrinth

The cochlear form of otosclerosis is characterized by irreversible metabolic changes that lead to complete hearing loss. Cochlear implantation, which is a high-tech method of rehabilitation for patients with profound hearing loss and complete deafness, becomes an opportunity for hearing restoration. However, CI in patients with cochlear otosclerosis may be accompanied by a number of difficulties due to the remodeling of the cochlea of varying severity. Thus, changes in the bony labyrinth play a crucial role in the management of patients with the cochlear form of otosclerosis and sensorineural hearing loss IV.

Current indications for cochlear implantation in adults and children

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Witold Szyfter ◽  
Michał Karlik ◽  
Alicja Sekula ◽  
Simon Harris ◽  
Wojciech Gawęcki
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Unilateral Deafness ◽  
Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Asymmetric Hearing Loss

Introduction: Surgical treatment of deafness by cochlear implants is used for more than 40 years, and during this period permanently, gradual and significant expansion of indications for this surgery has been observed. Material and methods: In our Department in the years 1994-2018 1480 cochlear implantations were performed, both in adults (647) and in children (883). In this study current indications and the rules for eligibility of patients based on 25 years of experience are presented. Results: Indications for cochlear implantation in adults are: 1) bilateral postlingual deafness, 2) bilateral sensorineural hearing loss - in pure tone audiometry > 70 dB HL (average 500-4000 Hz) and in speech audiometry in hearing aids understanding < 50% of words for the intensity of the stimulus 65 dB, in the absence of the benefits of hearing aids, 3) bilateral profound hearing loss for high frequency with good hearing for low frequency, in the absence of the benefits of hearing aids, 4) some cases of asymmetric hearing loss with intensive tinnitus in the deaf ear. An indication in children is bilateral sensorineural hearing loss > 80dB HL confirmed by hearing tests, after about 6 months of rehabilitation with the use of hearing aids. Discussion: Although cochlear implantation is used for more than 40 years, the indications for this treatment underlies constant modifications. They concern the age of eligible patients, implantation in patients with partially preserved hearing, as well as treatment for patients with difficult anatomical conditions. In many countries, bilateral implantations are commonly performed, and more and more centers recommend this treatment in the case of unilateral deafness or asymmetric hearing loss, especially with the accompanying tinnitus in the deaf ear.

Cochlear implantation in a patient with profound hearing loss with the A1555G mitochondrial DNA mutation and no history of aminoglycoside exposure

2005 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Arif Ulubil ◽  
Alexis D Furze ◽  
Simon I Angeli
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Mtdna Mutation ◽  
Mitochondrial Dna Mutation ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Dna Mutation ◽  
A1555g Mutation ◽  
History Of

The A1555G mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA) point mutation has classically been associated with sensorineural hearing loss in patients following aminoglycoside exposure. More recently, the mutation has been implicated in sensorineural hearing loss in patients without previous aminoglycoside use. In addition, cochlear implantation has been shown to be effective in the group of patients with prior aminoglycoside exposure but, to date, no case of cochlear implantation in a patient with the A1555G mutation and no prior exposure to aminoglycosides has been explicitly described in the literature.We report the case of an 80-year-old woman with the A1555G mtDNA mutation, a 35-year history of bilateral progressive hearing loss and no history of aminoglycoside exposure who underwent successful implantation of a Nucleus 24 Contour device at our institution. Post-operatively, the patient exhibited marked improvement in tests of auditory performance.We conclude that cochlear implantation can be an effective method to restore some sense of hearing in patients with the A1555G mtDNA mutation and sensorineural hearing loss.

scholarly journals Cochlear implantation in a patient with mucopolysaccharidosis IVA

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2050313X1987379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoko Nagao ◽  
Cassidy Walter ◽  
William J Parkes ◽  
Michael Teixido ◽  
Mary C Theroux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Mucopolysaccharidosis Iva ◽  
Morquio A ◽  
Auditory Performance

Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (OMIM 253000; also known as Morquio A syndrome) is associated with skeletal, airway, and hearing abnormalities. Cochlear implantation is an effective intervention for patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Patients can gain substantial improvement in auditory performance, speech perception, and their quality of life from cochlear implantation. Although severe progressive sensorineural hearing loss is a common feature of mucopolysaccharidosis IVA, no detailed description of cochlear implantation for mucopolysaccharidosis IVA has been reported. To review the effectiveness and special considerations associated with cochlear implantation in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis IVA, we here report the case of cochlear implantation in mucopolysaccharidosis IVA by a multidisciplinary team. A retrospective chart review was conducted on a 34-year-old female with mucopolysaccharidosis IVA, who received a cochlear implant. Audiometric thresholds, speech perception scores, and cochlear implant processor mapping information were reviewed during the first 12 months following cochlear implantation. The results of audiological tests indicate improved hearing thresholds as well as remarkable enhancement of speech perception skills over 12 months of cochlear implant use. Cochlear implantation improved auditory performance in a mucopolysaccharidosis IVA patient with postlingually severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. The benefits of cochlear implantation could be meaningful for other Morquio patients with progressive hearing loss, although the risks of surgery and anesthesia should be carefully considered by a multidisciplinary team of experts during the cochlear implant candidacy process.

Metachronous Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Patient Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 162 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-342
Author(s):  
Timothy Cooper ◽  
Ronak Dixit ◽  
Candace E. Hobson ◽  
Barry E. Hirsch ◽  
Andrew A. McCall
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Rare Presentation ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
The Mean

Objectives Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is a distressing condition that can significantly affect quality of life. Unilateral ISSNHL, occurring first in 1 ear and then the contralateral ear at a separate and discrete time, is a rare presentation that we refer to as metachronous ISSNHL. Our objective was to characterize the presentation of metachronous ISSNHL and report on management and hearing outcomes. Study Design Retrospective case series. Setting Otology clinic at an academic tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods Patients ≥18 years old presenting with metachronous ISSNHL between April 2008 to November 2017 were identified through review of the clinic electronic medical record. Metachronous ISSNHL was defined as unilateral ISSNHL occurring in temporally discrete episodes (>6 months apart) affecting both ears. Patients with identifiable causes for sudden hearing loss were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, management, and audiologic outcomes were recorded. Results Eleven patients with metachronous ISSNHL were identified out of 558 patients with ISSNHL. In patients with metachronous ISSNHL, the mean ± standard deviation age at the time of ISSNHL in the second ear was 58.6 ± 15.2 years (range, 31-77 years). The mean interval between episodes was 9.6 ± 7.5 years (range, 1-22 years). Patients were treated with systemic and intratympanic steroids with variable hearing recovery; 5 patients with resultant bilateral severe to profound hearing loss underwent successful cochlear implantation. Conclusion Metachronous ISSNHL is uncommon. Treatment is similar to ISSNHL, and cochlear implantation can successfully restore hearing in individuals who do not experience recovery.

scholarly journals Cochlear Implantation Following Explorative Tympanotomy in Patients With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Surgical Features and Audiological Outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 014556132110091
Author(s):  
Robin Rupp ◽  
Joachim Hornung ◽  
Matthias Balk ◽  
Matti Sievert ◽  
Sarina Müller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Round Window Membrane ◽  
Hearing Results ◽  
Round Window Niche

Objective: To investigate the anatomical status of the round window niche and hearing outcome of cochlear implantation (CI) after explorative tympanotomy (ExT) with sealing of the round window membrane in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss at a tertiary referral medical center. Methods: Between January 1, 2007, and July 30, 2020, 1602 patients underwent CI at our department. Out of these, all patients previously treated by ExT with sealing of the round window membrane because of unilateral sudden hearing loss were included in the study. A retrospective chart review was conducted concerning method of round window membrane sealing, intraoperative findings during CI, postoperative imaging, and hearing results. Results: Twenty one patients (9 females; 8 right ears; 54.3 years [± 12.9 years]) underwent ExT with sealing of the round window membrane with subsequent CI after 26.6 months (± 32.9 mo) on average. During CI, in 76% of cases (n = 16), the round window niche was blocked by connective tissue due to the previous intervention but could be removed completely in all cases. The connective tissue itself and its removal had no detrimental effects on the round window membrane. Postoperative computed tomography scan showed no electrode dislocation. Mean postoperative word recognition score after 3 months was 57.4% (± 17.2%) and improved significantly to 73.1% (± 16.4%, P = .005) after 2 years. Conclusion: Performing CI after preceding ExT, connective tissue has to be expected blocking the round window niche. Remaining tissue can be removed safely and does not alter the round window membrane allowing for a proper electrode insertion. Short- and long-term hearing results are satisfactory. Consequently, ExT with sealing of the round window membrane in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss does not impede subsequent CI that can still be performed safely.

Hearing Rehabilitation in a Patient with Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss in the Only Hearing Ear

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 267-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Hawkins
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
The Other ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Rehabilitation ◽  
Aural Rehabilitation ◽  
Product Manager ◽  
Software Product

A case report is presented of a 62-year-old software product manager who had normal hearing in one ear and a congenital profound hearing loss in the other ear and then sustained a sudden sensorineural hearing loss in the only hearing ear. The approach to amplification decisions, cochlear implant evaluation, and rehabilitation options are discussed. Providing aural rehabilitation and continually updating and providing new amplification options and accessories are described. Se presenta un reporte de caso de un gerente de productos de software de 62 años de edad quien tenía audición normal en un oído y un sordera congénita profunda en el otro, y quién súbitamente sufrió una sordera sensorineural súbita en el único oído con audición. Se discute el enfoque de decisiones de amplificación, la evaluación para implante coclear, y las opciones de rehabilitación. Se describen las pautas para proveer rehabilitación aural y para actualizar continuamente y aportar nuevas opciones de amplificación.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document