scholarly journals Effects of Pulsed Versus Conventional Versus Combined Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (20;6) ◽  
pp. E873-E881
Author(s):  
Ghaydaa A. Ghaydaa A.
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Gasserian Ganglion ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Group Setting ◽  
Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: During radiofrequency bursts of energy are applied to nervous tissue. The clinical advantages of this treatment remain unclear. Objectives: We compared the effectiveness and pain relief for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (TN) after continuous radiofrequency (CRF), pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), and combined continuous and pulsed radiofrequency (CCPRF) treatment of the Gasserian ganglion (GG). Study Design: We conducted a randomized prospective study. Forty-three patients were included. Eleven patients were treated with PRF at 42°C for 10 minutes (PRF group), 12 patients received CRF for 270 seconds at 75 °C (CRF group), and 20 patients received PRF for 10 minutes at 42°C followed by CRF for at 60°C for 270 seconds (CCPRF group). Setting: Assuit University Hospital, Pain and Neurology outpatient clinics. Methods: Patients were assessed for pain, satisfaction, and consumption of analgesics at baseline and 7 days, one month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after the procedure. The incidence of complications, anesthesia dolorosa, weakness of muscles of mastication, numbness, and technical complications, was evaluated after the procedure. Results: Excellent pain relief was achieved after 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively in 95%, 85%, and 70% of patients with CCPRF; 75%, 75%, and reduced to 50% among patients with CRF; and 82%, reduced to 9.1%, and 0% of patients with PRF. No complications were recorded in 75% of patients in the CCPRF and PRF groups. There was one case of anesthesia dolorosa, 4 cases of masseter muscle weakness, and 5 cases of severe numbness recorded in the CRF group. Limitation: There was a small number of patients in each group. Conclusion: The best results were observed in the CCPRF group, followed by the CRF group, and then the PRF group.

scholarly journals Radiofrequency Thermoablation of the Gasserian Ganglion Versus the Peripheral Branches of the Trigeminal Nerve for Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized, Control Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (22.2) ◽  
pp. 147-154
Author(s):  
Neerja Bharti
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Facial Pain ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Gasserian Ganglion ◽  
Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Radiofrequency Thermoablation

Background: Trigeminal neuralgia is the most painful condition of facial pain leading to impairment of routine activities. Although radiofrequency thermoablation (RFT) of the Gasserian ganglion is widely used for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia in patients having ineffective pain relief with medical therapy, the incidence of complications like hypoesthesia, neuroparalytic keratitis, and masticatory muscles weakness is high. Recent case reports have shown the effectiveness of RFT of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve for relief of refractory chronic facial pain conditions including trigeminal neuralgia. Objectives: This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of RFT of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve with RFT of the Gasserian ganglion for the management of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, clinical trial. Setting: Tertiary care hospital and medical education and research institute. Methods: A total of 40 adult patients of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The control group received RFT of the Gasserian ganglion while the study group received RFT of the peripheral branches of trigeminal nerve. The procedures were performed in the operation room under all aseptic precautions with fluoroscopic guidance. Post-procedure, the patients were assessed for loss of sensation along the nerve distribution and the adequacy of pain relief on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The patients were followed up for 3 month to assess the quality of pain relief by the NRS and the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scale. Improvement in pain was considered excellent if patients had complete pain relief without any medication, good if there was significant reduction in pain (> 50%) with or without medication, and poor if there was less than 50% reduction in pain with medications. Patients were also assessed for numbness and any other side effects. Patients’ satisfaction with the procedure was recorded. Results: Nineteen patients in the control group and 18 in study group had effective pain relief of up to 3 months. Their pain scores were comparable at all time intervals, though the number of patients receiving supplementary medications was more in study group at 2 months (P = 0.015). The patients showed overall satisfaction score of 8.5 (8-9) and 8 (7-9) in control and study groups respectively. The average procedure duration was 30 (30-38) minutes in the control group and 28 (25-40) minutes in the study group. Most of the patients in both groups had mild numbness after the procedure. One patient in the control group had lower eyelid swelling and another had mild weakness of the masseter muscle, which resolved few days later. No major complication was reported in the study group except for 1 patient who reported local ecchymosis. Limitations: The main limitation of the study is that the patients and the investigator performing the procedure were not blinded, though the person who assessed the patient during follow-up was blinded to the group assignment. Another limitation is that we could not follow up with the patients after 3 months due to time constraints. Conclusion: We found that radiofrequency thermoablation of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve is an effective and safe procedure for the management of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Key words: Idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia, radiofrequency thermoablation, Gasserian ganglion, peripheral nerve branches, pain, trigeminal nerve

Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the Gasserian ganglion in patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia

Pain ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Van Zundert ◽  
Steven Brabant ◽  
Erik Van de Kelft ◽  
Alex Vercruyssen ◽  
Jean-Pierre Van Buyten
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Gasserian Ganglion ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Radiofrequency Treatment ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment ◽  
Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia

scholarly journals Management of Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia Using Extended Duration Pulsed Radiofrequency Application

2015 ◽  
Vol 3;18 (3;5) ◽  
pp. E433-E435
Author(s):  
Vanita Ahuja
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Sensory Stimulation ◽  
Gasserian Ganglion ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Extended Duration ◽  
Key Words Trigeminal Neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) produces incapacitating facial pain that reduces quality of life in patients. Thermal radiofrequency (RF) ablation of gasserian ganglion (GG) is associated with masseter weakness and unpleasant sensations along the distribution of the ablated nerve. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of GG has minimal side effects but literature is inconclusive regarding its benefit in refractory TN. Increasing the duration of PRF application to 6 minutes in TN produced encouraging results. PRF application to the saphenous nerve for 8 minutes reported improved pain relief and patient satisfaction. We report successful management of two patients of classic TN, which were refractory to medical management and interventional nerve blocks. The lesion site were confirmed with motor and sensory stimulation through a 22 G, 10 cm RF needle with 5 mm active tip. Both the patients received four cycles of PRF at 42 °C with each cycle of 120 seconds (8 minutres). The visual analogue scale (VAS) in case 1 reduced from pre block score of 80 to score 10 postblock, while in case 2 the VAS reduced from pre-block score of 85 to score 15 postblock. During follow up both the patients are now pain free with minimal dose of carbamazepine at 12 and 6 months respectively. We used PRF for longer duration (8 minutes) in these patients, which resulted in improved VAS and WHOQOL-BREF score in these patients. PRF of mandibular division of GG for extended duration provided long-term effective pain relief and quality of life in patients of refractory classic TN. Key words: Trigeminal neuralgia pain, pulsed radiofrequency ablation, interventional approach

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document