scholarly journals Endoscopic Retrieval of a Broken Guidewire During Spinal Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2;2) ◽  
pp. E339-E342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Gu
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Posterolateral Approach ◽  
Intraoperative Complication ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Endoscopic Retrieval ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Since the percutaneous posterolateral approach in treating lumbar disc herniation was introduced in 1973, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has become a routine minimally invasive spinal procedure. However, as clinical evidence accumulated, several complications of PELD have raised our concerns, including the intraoperative injury to neural, vascular structures and failure of surgery. Herein, we present 2 patients who experienced guidewire breakage during PELD procedure to demonstrate the details. The 2 patients, who are 28 and 33 years old, were diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation with or without intervertebral foreman stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Following a preoperative evaluation, a PELD procedure was performed with the help of local anesthesia. During the advancement of the obturator and foraminotomy under fluoroscopy, the guidewire was found broken. With the patients’ permission, the operator inserted the working cannula to the broken end of the guidewire and retrieved it by straight grasping forceps under endoscopy. The patients were reported to recover from their back pain immediately after the operation and hence the postoperative course was stable. In conclusion, the guidewire breakage in PELD procedures is a rare but severe complication, which requires immediate removal. An appropriate manner and fluoroscopic control are recommended to forestall such problems. It is possible to retrieve the broken guidewire under endoscopy with skillful experience. Key words: Endoscopic discectomy, intraoperative complication, instrument breakage, minimally invasive surgery

scholarly journals Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-Wei Jiang ◽  
Cheng-Dong Chen ◽  
Bi-Shui Zhan ◽  
Yong-Li Wang ◽  
Pan Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Incision Length ◽  
Hidden Blood Loss ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Abstract Background Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) is a rapidly growing surgical method that uses arthroscopic system for treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), while percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has been standardized as a representative minimally invasive spine surgical technique for LDH. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between UBE and PELD for treatment of patients with LDH. Methods The subjects consisted of 54 patients who underwent UBE (24 cases) and PELD (30 cases) who were followed up for at least 6 months. All patients had lumber disc herniation for 1 level. Outcomes of the patients were assessed with operation time, incision length, hospital stay, total blood loss (TBL), intraoperative blood loss (IBL), hidden blood loss (HBL), complications, total hospitalization costs, visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria. Results The VAS scores and ODI decreased significantly in two groups after operation. Preoperative and 1 day, 1 month, 6 months after operation VAS and ODI scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared with PELD group, UBE group was associated with higher TBL, higher IBL, higher HBL, longer operation time, longer hospital stay, longer incision length, and more total hospitalization costs. However, a dural tear occurred in one patient of the UBE group. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the two groups. Conclusions Application of UBE for treatment of lumbar disc herniation yielded similar clinical outcomes to PELD, including pain control and patient satisfaction. However, UBE was associated with various disadvantages relative to PELD, including increased total, intraoperative and hidden blood loss, longer operation times, longer hospital stays, and more total hospitalization costs.

scholarly journals Endoscopic lumbar discectomy using side viewing conical working tube

2021 ◽  
pp. 108-113
Author(s):  
Mohammad Kaif ◽  
Kuldeep Yadav ◽  
Rakesh Kumar ◽  
Deepak Kumar Singh
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Lumbar Disc Prolapse ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Objective: The paradigm of surgical therapy for spinal disease especially for lumbar disc herniation has gradually shifted from traditional open surgeries to minimally invasive spinal surgeries. Endoscopic discectomy has been performed widely using various devices and techniques. In this study, we present our experience of endoscopic discectomy using a unique device with separate side viewing channel. Methods: 26 patients of lumbar disc herniation treated between March 2015 to April 2018 using the unique conical working tube with separate side-viewing endoscopic channel have been retrospectively analysed. Their preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Macnab scores were used to evaluate the outcome with a mean follow up of 37.04 months. Results: There were 18 males and 08 females with age ranging from 19-72 years (mean-38.4 years). The follow up ranged from 25 months to 60 months with a mean of 37.04 months. The mean preoperative ODI score was 72.4 which decreased to a mean of 7.6 and the outcome evaluated by Macnab criteria was 65.3% excellent, 19.2 % good, 11.5% fair, 3.8% poor. 1 patient underwent a second surgery. None of the patients had to change their occupation postoperatively. Complications occurred were dural tear in 1 patient and transient foot paresis in 1 which improved spontaneously. Conclusion: Endoscopic discectomy using conical working tube is a safe and effective technique for lumbar disc prolapse. The long term results are comparable to conventional techniques.

scholarly journals Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Surgical Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study with a Minimum of 2 Years’ Follow-Up

2020 ◽  
Vol 1;24 (1;1) ◽  
pp. E117-E125
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Intraoperative Fluoroscopy ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Microendoscopic Discectomy

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) are alternative minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, insufficient literature exists to highlight the differences between the procedures. OBJECTIVES: This study intended to clarify whether PTED results in better clinical outcomes compared with MED in the surgical management of single-level LDH. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This study took place in 2 spinal minimally invasive centers in Beijing, China. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in consecutive patients diagnosed with symptomatic LDH receiving PTED or MED in 2 spinal minimally invasive centers from April 2009 to July 2016. A total of 1,053 patients were recruited, of which 632 underwent PTED and 421 underwent MED. All patients were followed with a minimum of 2 years; a set of clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: The operation time was similar between groups (71.2 ± 15.1 minutes in the PTED group and 69.4 ± 12.5 minutes in the MED group; P = 0.518); length of incision was significantly shorter; intraoperative blood loss was less in the PTED group (P < 0.001); hospital stay was 3.6 ± 1.5 days in the PTED group and 5.4 ± 2.8 days in the MED group with significant differences detected (P = 0.018); however, intraoperative fluoroscopy was longer with significantly higher cost with the PTED group (P < 0.001). Transient dysesthesia and wound complications were more common in the MED group (P = 0.039 and P = 0.026, respectively); however, no significant differences were found with total complications (P = 0.139). Significant lower Visual Analog Scale pain score (back and leg) were detected on day 1 postoperatively (P = 0.007 and P = 0.018, respectively). No significant differences were found at all other time points (P > 0.05). Significantly better Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was detected postoperatively at 1 month in the PTED group (19.6 ± 9.8 vs. 27.2 ± 9.3; P = 0.016); ODI score at other time points did not differ significantly between groups (P > 0.05). Modified MacNab criteria showed that most patients experienced excellent and good results with no significant differences between groups (P = 0.511). LIMITATION: This was a multicenter retrospective study wherein the surgeons may have introduced bias to the study. CONCLUSIONS: Both PTED and MED present to be an acceptable long-term efficacy for the treatment of LDH. Although PTED is associated with longer intraoperative fluoroscopy and a little more cost, it should still be considered superior to MED considering the benefits of lesser invasion, shorter hospital stays, quicker pain relief, and functional recovery. KEY WORDS: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, lumbar disc herniation, VAS score, ODI score

scholarly journals Comparison of quality of life between men and women who underwent Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

10.14444/4028 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stylianos Kapetanakis ◽  
Grigorios Gkasdaris ◽  
Tryfon Thomaidis ◽  
Georgios Charitoudis ◽  
Konstantinos Kazakos
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document