DEXMEDETOMIDINE VS DEXAMETHASONE AS AN ADJUVANT TO 0.5% ROPIVACAINE IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
Rahul Kumar ◽  
Anant Prakash ◽  
Chandeshwar Choudhary ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Analgesic Consumption ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background And Aims: Both dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone have individually been shown to be benecial as an adjuvant to ropivacaine. We compared the efcacy of combination of ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine with dexamethasone in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus (SCBP) block. Material And Methods: In this prospective randomised double blind controlled trial, 60 ASA physical status I/II patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery under ultrasound guided SCBP block with 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine were randomised into three groups. Group 1 (n = 20) received 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine, and group 2 (n = 20) received 8 mg of dexamethasone in addition to ropivacaine, while group 3 (n = 20) received only ropivacaine. The primary outcomes studied were onset and duration of sensory and motor block. Secondary outcomes included duration of analgesia, total analgesic consumption in 24 h postoperatively and quality of block. ANOVA and Chi-square test were used to compare results on continuous measurements and categorical measurements, respectively. Results: Onset of sensory and motor block was faster in group 1 (13.5 ± 4.1 and 17.0 ± 4.1 min) and group 2 (15.6 ± 3.6 and 18.5 ± 3.7 min) as compared to group 3 (20.1 ± 5.3 and 24.9 ± 5.6 min; P < 0.001). Block duration was signicantly longer in group 1 and group 2 than in group 3. Duration of analgesia was prolonged in group 1 and 2 (1218.0 ± 224.6 and 1128.0 ± 207.5 min, respectively) as compared to group 3 (768.0 ± 273.7 min; P < 0.001). Twenty four hours analgesic consumption postoperatively was reduced in the two study groups. Conclusion: Both dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone when used as adjuvants to ropivacaine for SCBP block, block onset time, and prolong' block duration

scholarly journals Effects of Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Lidocaine with Epinephrine in Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4181
Author(s):  
Anil Ranganath ◽  
Tomas Hitka ◽  
Gabriella Iohom
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Axillary Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Plexus Block ◽  
Group 1

This study evaluated the effects of adding adjuvant clonidine to lidocaine with epinephrine on the characteristics of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB) for upper extremity surgery. Twenty-four patients were randomised to receive an ultrasound guided ABPB with 20 mL of lidocaine 2% with 1:200,000 epinephrine plus 2 mL of either normal saline 0.9% (Group 1) or a mixture of clonidine 1 µg/kg and normal saline 0.9% (Group 2). The outcome measures that were recorded were the overall onset time and the duration of sensory and motor block. The median (IQR) overall onset time of sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in Group 2 vs. Group 1 (5 (5–7.5) min vs. 10 (8.8–12.5) min; p < 0.001) and (5 (2.5–7.5) min vs. 7.5 (6.3–7.5) min; p = 0.001), respectively. The median (IQR) overall duration of sensory and motor block was significantly longer in Group 2 vs. Group 1 (225 (200–231) min vs. 168 (148–190) min; p < 0.001) and (225 (208–231) min vs. 168(148–186) min; p < 0.001), respectively. In ultrasound-guided ABPB, the addition of clonidine to lidocaine with epinephrine resulted in shorter onset time and prolonged duration of sensory and motor block.

scholarly journals Effects of local anaesthetic dilution on the characteristics of ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block: a randomised controlled study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Ranganath ◽  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Gabriella Iohom
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Performance Time ◽  
Axillary Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Plexus Block ◽  
Group 1

Aims: Ultrasound guidance has led to marked improvement in the success rate and characteristics of peripheral nerve blocks. However, effects of varying the volume or concentration of a fixed local anaesthetic dose on nerve block remains unclear. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether at a fixed dose of lidocaine, altering the volume and concentration will have any effect on the onset time of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block.Material and methods: Twenty patients were randomised to receive an ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with either lidocaine 2% with epinephrine (20 ml, Group 2%) or lidocaine 1% with epinephrine (40 ml, Group 1%). The primary endpoint was block onset time. Secondary outcomes included duration of the block, performance time, number of needle passes, incidence of paraesthesia and vascular puncture.Results: The median [IQR] onset time of surgical anaesthesia was shorter in Group 1% when compared to Group 2% (6.25 [5-7.5] min vs 8.75 [7.5-10] min; p=0.03). The mean (SD) overall duration of surgical anaesthesia was significantly shorter in Group 1% compared to Group 2% (150.9±17.2 min vs 165.1±5.9 min; p=0.02). Group 1% had a shorter performance time with fewer needle passes. The incidence of vascular puncture and paraesthesia was similar in the two groups.Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks performed using a higher volume of lower concentration lidocaine was associated with shorter onset time and duration of surgical anaesthesia.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO DIFFERENT DOSES OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS ADJUNCT TO LIDOCAINE IN INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 2259-2264
Author(s):  
Diana Salam Sami ◽  
Ali Hadi Muslih
Keyword(s):  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Different Doses ◽  
Group 1

The aim: To compare the different doses of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to lidocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia. Materials and methods: Ninety patients participated in this study in Al-Yarmook teaching hospital in period between January 1st 2016 – July 1st 2016, divided randomly in to 3 groups. Group 1: received lidocaine diluted with normal saline; Group 2 – lidocaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg; Group3 -lidocaine with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg. Statistical analysis was done by IBM SPSS program version 20 and Microsoft excel version 2010 , the means were compared by ANOVA methods and Dunnett t3, significancebetween groups were recorded if p value less than 0.05. Results: Dexmedetomidine was effective in decreasing the sensory block onset time and motor block onset time and prolongation of the motor and sensory recovery with no significant hemodynamic changes than is often shown by the lidocaine alone, it also prolongs the time interval for analgesic requirement after the operation. For the group 3 it was faster than in group 2 and faster than in group 1 significantly (p value < 0.001) to form a sensory block onset and motor block onset; and it took significantly more time to recover the sensation than in group 1 (p value <0.001) and 2 (p value <0.002) , and more time for motor recovery than in group 1 (p value < 0.001). Group 3 had the longest time to call for the analgesia after operation than group 2 and 3 (p value < 0.001); and group 2 also had longer time for the same process than group 1 (p value < 0.001). Conclusions: A variety of adjuvants have been used in IVRA to decrease tourniquet pain, improve block quality, and prolong analgesia after cuff deflation. Opioids are relatively ineffective and cause nausea, vomiting, and dizziness after tourniquet deflation, but several NSAIDs have been shown to be beneficial, dexmedetomidine improves block quality and postoperative analgesia.

The effect of various dilute administration of rocuronium blomide on both vascular pain and pharmacologic onset: A randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayuko Kanazawa ◽  
Aiji Sato(Boku) ◽  
Yoko Okumura ◽  
Mayumi Hashimoto ◽  
Naoko Tachi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Muscle Relaxation ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Large Vein ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Vascular Pain ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Rocuronium bromide (RB) is known to cause vascular pain. Although there have been a few reports that diluted administration causes less vascular pain, there have been no studies investigating diluted administration and the onset time of muscle relaxation. Therefore, we examined the influence of diluted administration of RB on the onset time of muscle relaxation and vascular pain. Methods 51 patients were randomly assigned to three groups: RB stock solution 10 mg/ml (Group 1), two-fold dilution 5 mg/ml (Group 2), or three-fold dilution 3.3 mg/ml (Group 3). After the largest vein of the forearm was secured, anesthesia was induced by propofol and 0.6 mg/kg of RB was administered. The evaluation method devised by Shevchenko et al. was used to evaluate the degree of vascular pain. The time from RB administration until the maximum blocking of T1 by TOF stimulation was measured. Results There was no significant difference in escape behaviors of vascular pain among the three groups, and the onset time of muscle relaxation was significantly slower in Group 3 than in Group 1 (p=0.033). Conclusion Our results suggested that it is unnecessary to dilute RB before administration if a large vein in the forearm is used. Trial Registration UMINCTR Registration number UMIN000026737 Registered 28 Mar 2017

scholarly journals A prospective randomised study of adjuvants for supraclavicular brachial plexus block: Clonidine vs Dexamethasone

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-514
Author(s):  
Akanksha Aggarwal ◽  
Nimit Gandhi
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Plexus Block ◽  
Group 1

 Supraclavicular brachial plexus block is among foremost technique of regional anaesthesia administered during upper-limb surgery. Different adjuvants have been used with varied results for prolonging the sensory and motor blockade. Dexamethasone and Clonidine have been established as suitable adjuvants for blocks. Adding adjuvants to local anaesthetic drugs in nerve blocks has many benefits. We studied performance of dexamethasone or clonidine as additives to local anaesthetic in subclavian perivascular block as a part of upper limb surgery. Aim was to ascertain which of them is a better adjuvant. Study population was randomized to 2 groups of 50 patients each. Group 1 was given 5 ml of 2% lignocaine and 15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with 8mg dexamethasone. Group 2 received 5ml 2% lignocaine and 15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with 0.150 mg clonidine. Time to establishment of sensory & motor block, duration of analgesia and any adverse effects were observed. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 13.0. Quantitative variables were assessed using student t test. Qualitative variables were analysed using Chi square test. P value &#60; 0.05 was defined as significant. Onset of sensory blockade was at 7.23+4.24 in group 1 and 8.36+2.68 minutes in Group 2. Average time to motor block was at 8.48+3.22 minutes in Group 1 and 9.58+3.71 minutes in Group 2. Analgesia’s duration in Group 1 and Group 2 was 998.2+338.5 and 879.3+284.5 minutes respectively. No major adverse events were seen in either group. Performance of dexamethasone was similar to clonidine as adjunct to local anaesthetic in subclavian perivascular approach of brachial plexus block. However, it has faster sensory and motor blockade’s onset. Analgesia’s duration observed was found to be longer, though the difference was statistically insignificant.

scholarly journals The effect of various dilute administration of rocuronium bromide on both vascular pain and pharmacologic onset: A randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayuko Kanazawa ◽  
Aiji Sato(Boku) ◽  
Yoko Okumura ◽  
Mayumi Hashimoto ◽  
Naoko Tachi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Muscle Relaxation ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Rocuronium Bromide ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Vascular Pain ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: Rocuronium bromide (RB) is known to cause vascular pain. Although there have been a few reports that diluted administration causes less vascular pain, there have been no studies investigating diluted administration and the onset time of muscle relaxation. Therefore, we examined the influence of diluted administration of RB on the onset time of muscle relaxation and vascular pain. Methods: 39 patients were randomly assigned to three groups: RB stock solution 10 mg/ml (Group 1), two-fold dilution 5 mg/ml (Group 2), or three-fold dilution 3.3 mg/ml (Group 3). After the largest vein of the forearm was secured, anesthesia was induced by propofol and 0.6 mg/kg of RB was administered. The evaluation method devised by Shevchenko et al. was used to evaluate the degree of vascular pain. The time from RB administration until the maximum blocking of T1 by TOF stimulation was measured. Results: There was no significant difference in escape behaviors of vascular pain among the three groups, and the onset time of muscle relaxation was significantly slower in Group 3 than in Group 1 (p=0.035). Conclusion: Our results suggested that it is unnecessary to dilute RB before administration if a large vein in the forearm is used. Trial Registration: UMINCTR Registration number UMIN000026737, Registered 28 Mar 2017 Keywords: Rocuronium bromide, Diluted administration, Onset time, Vascular pain

Effect of Chlorhexidine Cleansing of Umbilical Cord for Prevention of Infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Md Khairuzzaman ◽  
MA Mannan ◽  
Abdul Matin ◽  
Mst Monjuman Ara Sarker ◽  
Nihar Ranjan Sarker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Umbilical Cord ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Cord Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Level Hospital ◽  
Group 1

Background: Chlorhexidine cleansing of the cord can reduce neonatal mortality among newborns.Objective: The aim of study was to determine the effect of cord cleansing with chlorhexidine in reduction of umbilical infection among newborns in hospital settings.Methodology: This randomized controlled trial was carried out between April 2013 to July 2014 and 510 newborns were randomly assigned within a tertiary level hospital in Bangladesh to receive 1 of 3 cord care regimens single cord cleansing with 4% chlorhexidine(Group-1), multiple cord cleansing with 4% chlorhexidine (Group-2)  and clean and dry cord care (Group-3 : control).Results: The risk of umbilical cord infection (omphalitis) was significantly reduced in both the single (Relative risk [RR] 0.15 [95% CI] 0.008-0.93) and multiple chlorhexidine cleansing group (RR 0.37 [95% CI] 0.04- 0.99) compared to the dry cord care group.  The risk of omphalitis was not significantly different between multiple and single chlorhexidine cleansing group (RR 3.14 [0.13-76.54]). Conclusion: Chlorhexidine significantly reduce the risk of umbilical infection in both single and multiple cord cleansing neonates.Bangladesh Journal of Infectious Diseases 2017;4(2):35-39

Lumbar Plexus in Children

2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 445-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Kirchmair ◽  
Birgit Enna ◽  
Gottfried Mitterschiffthaler ◽  
Bernhard Moriggl ◽  
Manfred Greher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Posterior Part ◽  
Lumbar Plexus ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Psoas Major Muscle ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Paravertebral Region ◽  
Group 1

Background Pediatric regional anesthesia has gained increasing interest over the past decades. The current study was conducted to investigate the lumbar paravertebral region and the lumbar plexus at L3-L4 and L4-L5 by means of sonography to obtain fundamentals for the performance of ultrasound-guided posterior lumbar plexus blocks. Methods Thirty-two children (12 boys, 20 girls) with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were enrolled in the current study. The lumbar paravertebral region was visualized at L3-L4 and L4-L5 on two corresponding posterior sonograms (longitudinal, transverse). The lumbar plexus had to be delineated, and skin-plexus distances were measured. In a series of five pediatric patients undergoing inguinal herniotomy, ultrasound-guided posterior lumbar plexus blocks at L4-L5 were performed. Results The children were stratified into three age groups (group 1: &gt; 3 yr and &lt;/= 5 yr; group 2: &gt; 5 yr and &lt;/= 8 yr; group 3: &gt; 8 yr and &lt;/= 12 yr). The lumbar plexus could be delineated at L3-L4 and L4-L5 in 19 of 20 cases in group 1, in 17 of 20 cases in group 2, in 22 of 24 cases at L3-L4 in group 3, and in 16 of 24 cases at L4-L5 in group 3. In all patients, the lumbar plexus was situated within the posterior part of the psoas major muscle. Skin-plexus distances showed statistical significant differences between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3. The strongest positive correlation existed between skin-plexus distances and the children's weight. Ultrasound guidance enabled safe und successful posterior approaches to the lumbar plexus, thus resulting in effective anesthesia and analgesia of the inguinal region. Conclusions Sonography of the lumbar plexus in children proved to be feasible. Skin-plexus distances correlated with the children's weight rather than with their age. The sonographic findings were fundamental for the performance of successful ultrasound-guided posterior approaches in a small group of pediatric patients.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks for upper limb surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-171
Author(s):  
Raluca UNGUREANU ◽  
◽  
Liliana MIREA ◽  
Ioana GRINŢESCU ◽  
Dan TULBURE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Block Success ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Locoregional Anesthesia ◽  
Plexus Block

Introduction. The use of ultrasound (US) for brachial plexus block has increased enthusiasm because the anesthesiologist can visualize anatomy, needle placement, and local anesthetic spread during locoregional anesthesia. The objectives of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of ultrasound guided brachial plexus block comparative with traditional method of neurostimulation. Material and methods. In this randomized controlled clinical trial we included patients over 18 years old with upper limb surgery and who benefit of brachial plexus block (axillary, interscalenic or combined blocks). After monitoring and sedation, the patients randomly received ultrasound-guided (62 pts.) or neuro stimulation (63 pts.) brachial plexus block with ropivacaine 0.5%. We recorded data about: block success rate, sensitive and motor block onset time, block performance time, immediate and late complications events, patient’s satisfaction rate. The results were statistically analyzed, with significance assumed at p<0.05. Results. Block success rate with ultrasound guidance was very high (93.5% in US group and 84% in NS group). The patients of US group received less volume of local anesthetic (20.89 ± 3.9 ml vs. 43 ± 5.1 ml in NS group, p < 0.05). The performance time, needle punctures, sensory and motor onset time was significant reduced in US group. In the NS group we recorded 2 local anesthetic systemic toxicity (minor-moderate neurologic symptoms) with complete recovery and none in US group. We recorded less paresthesia during block performance and vascular puncture due to US guidance (p<0.05). Patient acceptance with locoregional anesthesia is good, even patients experience more discomfort during neurostimulation technique. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that both techniques of execution of brachial plexus block are adequate for upper limb surgery but US guidance provides significant benefits for patients in terms of efficacy and safety.

scholarly journals A Comparison of 0.5% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Axillary Brachial Plexus Anaesthesia

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. McGlade ◽  
M. V. Kalpokas ◽  
P. H. Mooney ◽  
D. Chamley ◽  
A. H. Mark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Plexus Block

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of 0.5% ropivacaine with 0.5% bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia. Sixty-six patients undergoing upper limb surgery were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial. Five patients were subsequently excluded for various reasons. Of the remaining patients, 30 received 40 ml of 0.5%) ropivacaine and 31 received 40 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. Brachial plexus block was performed by the axillary approach using a standardized technique with a peripheral nerve stimulator. Parameters investigated included the frequency, onset and duration of sensory and motor block, the quality of anaesthesia and the occurrence of any adverse events. The six principal nerves of the brachial plexus were studied individually. The frequency for achieving anaesthesia per nerve ranged from 70 to 90% in the ropivacaine group and 81 to 87% in the bupivacaine group. The median onset time for anaesthesia was 10 to 20 minutes with ropivacaine and 10 to 30 minutes with bupivacaine, and the median duration was 5.3 to 8.7h with ropivacaine and 6.9 to 20.3h with bupivacaine. Motor block was evaluated at the elbow, wrist and hand, and was completely achieved at a rate of 60 to 73% in the ropivacaine group and 55 to 71% in the bupivacaine group. The median duration of motor block was 6.5 to 7.5h with ropivacaine and 6.0 to 9.0h with bupivacaine. These parameters were not statistically different. The duration of partial motor block at the wrist (6.8 v 16.4h) and hand (6.7 v 12.3h) was significantly longer with bupivacaine. Ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.5%) appeared equally efficacious as long-acting local anaesthetics for axillary brachial plexus block.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document