SHORT VS LONG PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL IN UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF FEMUR

2021 ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
Chandra Sekhar.S ◽  
Manikumar. C.J ◽  
Pardhasaradhi. B

BACKGROUND; The current methods of treatment of Inter Trochanteric fractures of femur are either DHS plating for a stable Intertrochanteric fracture or a Proximal Femoral Nail for an unstable IT fracture. There are increased surgical demands and complications associated with Unstable IT fractures. Fracture patterns like –Posteromedial large separate fragment, Basi cervical pattern, Reverse obliquity pattern, Displaced and/or avulsed greater trochanter, Lateral wall fractures pose challenges before operating surgeon. Failure to reduce the fracture before internal xation and failure to hold the reduction till denitive xation are the most frequent causes of poor results irrespective of the implant used for xation. . Present surgeon's usual preference is towards long PFN. There is an added advantage of increased stability due to splinting of the whole length of femur with the use of long PFN. However there are times where short PFN is preferred over long one when there is a mismatch of curvature between the nail and the femur. However, there is no pre-established treatment choice protocol in choosing long nail or short nail for trochanteric fractures, but many surgeons are reluctant to use short proximal femoral nails biased by literature showing more fracture rates with short PFN usage and with a belief that long nails can avoid stress risers in the diaphysis and make peri- prosthetic fracture rates acceptable. Some of the drawbacks of long PFN include increased operative duration, reaming of the medullary canal distally, unavailability of distal locking jig, leading to prolongation of distal locking time and exposing the surgical team to more radiation. Stacking the above facts the study tried to verify these in the practical scenario. The study was conducted at the department of orthopaedics Andhra Medical College Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh. Salvage procedures like Dimon osteotomy and Sarmiento osteotomy were not entertained in the present study.This effectively limits the study to cephalomedullary xation of un stable per trochanteric fractures with short and long Proximal Femoral Nail. METHODS: Study design: Hospital Based Comparative study. Study period: October 2017 to September 2019. Sample size: 30 (N=30, Short PFN-15, Long PFN-15) The study population was randomly divided into 2 groups with 15 patients in each group. Group S (odd): The patients who were operated with Short Proximal Femoral Nail. Group L (even): The patients who were operated with Long Proximal Femoral Nail. RESULTS Thirty cases of unstable inter-trochanteric fractures treated with reduction and internal xation with long or short proximal femoral nail were studied. In the present study minimum age was 29 years and maximum age was 75 years. Majority of the patients were between 51 to 70 years of age. Mean age for long PFN was 52.83 +/- 10.33 SD years, (Range 29-70). Mean age for short PFN was 58.16 +/- 13.94 SD years, (Range 35-75). In the present study males predominate females with a male to female ratio of 3:2. CONCLUSION We conclude that both short and long nails appear acceptable for use in unstable inter-trochanteric fractures. A reduction in operative duration and reduction in blood loss, which translates into a reduced blood transfusion requirement more importantly signicant reduction in image intensier exposures seen with short PFN makes it a surgeon friendly implant. We prefer long PFN for xation of unstable trochanteric fractures with osteoporosis so as to splint the whole femur.

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 413
Author(s):  
MohamedA Mostafa ◽  
HassanH Ahmed ◽  
HaniA.M Bassiooni ◽  
ElsayedM Mohamady

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Man Cho ◽  
Seung Min Choi ◽  
JiYeon Park ◽  
Young Lee ◽  
Jung Hyung Bae

Abstract Background A complication associated with the distal locking screw used in the proximal femoral nail (PFN) system is the formation of accidental additional holes. We hypothesized that an increase in stress around additional holes is a relevant factor contributing to fractures. This study aimed to evaluate stress changes in the cortical bone around additional screw holes using finite element analysis. Methods Proximal femoral nail PFN antirotation (PFNA)-II (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland) was inserted into a femur model. An additional 4.9-mm transcortical hole was made either anteriorly (anterior hole model) or posteriorly (posterior hole model) to the distal locking screw. Finite element analysis was used to calculate compression, tension, and load limits to investigate stress around additional holes with respect to the direction of screw penetration and degree of osteoporosis. The results were then compared with those of mechanical testing. A 31A-21 type intertrochanteric fracture was applied. As a control group, a model without additional holes (no-hole model) was developed. Repeated load-loading tests were performed on 10 model bones per model group. Results Tensile stress was significantly greater in the no-hole model when additional screw holes were present, and the anterior hole showed a higher maximum stress value than the posterior hole did, suggesting that the anterior hole was more susceptible to fracture. The change in tensile stress first appeared in the hole around the lateral cortical bone and proceeded to the medial side. Biomechanical testing showed that fractures around the distal locking screw occurred in 0 cases of the no-hole, 10 of anterior hole, and 9 of the posterior hole models. Conclusions During PFN surgery for intertrochanteric fracture, holes with distal locking screws fixed and removed at the anterior and posterior of the nail can be a risk factor for fractures in the surrounding area.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
KRamaprathap Reddy ◽  
CV Dasaraiah ◽  
Meeravali Shaik ◽  
CK Ramesh Kumar

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 365-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herrera A. ◽  
Domingo L. ◽  
Calvo A. ◽  
Martínez A. ◽  
Cuenca J.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document