scholarly journals Recurrent respiratory infections as a presenting symptom of a double aortic arch

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-120
Author(s):  
Vladimír Mihál ◽  
Eva Klásková ◽  
František Kopřiva ◽  
Sabina Kaprálová ◽  
Kamila Michálková
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Double Aortic Arch ◽  
Recurrent Respiratory Infections

scholarly journals Recurrent respiratory infections caused by a double aortic arch: The diagnostic role of spirometry

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 47-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Calabrese ◽  
Nadia Corcione ◽  
Valentina Di Spirito ◽  
Carmine Guarino ◽  
Giovanni Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Double Aortic Arch ◽  
Recurrent Respiratory Infections ◽  
Diagnostic Role

scholarly journals Double aortic arch diagnosed in a 44-year-old woman with recurring respiratory infections

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 176-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Fenández-Tena ◽  
Cristina Martínez-González
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Double Aortic Arch

Neonatal tracheal reconstruction in tracheomalacia secondary to double aortic arch

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sandrio ◽  
W. Springer ◽  
M. Karck ◽  
M. Gorenflo ◽  
T. Loukanov
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Double Aortic Arch ◽  
Tracheal Reconstruction

Persistent Allergic Minimum Phlogosis as Mechanistic Link Between Recurrent Respiratory Infections and Atopy: A Single Center Pilot Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caterina Cuppari ◽  
Sara Manti ◽  
Annamaria Salpietro ◽  
Simona Valenti ◽  
Dominique De Vivo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Recurrent Respiratory Infections

Prenatal Diagnosis of Double Aortic Arch

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Bornaun ◽  
Sema Süzen Çaypınar ◽  
Zeynep Gedik Özköse ◽  
Nura Fitnat Topbaş ◽  
Mustafa Behram
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Double Aortic Arch

scholarly journals DOUBLE AORTIC ARCH

1951 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.F. Nuboer
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Double Aortic Arch

scholarly journals Study on the views and methods of ultrasonic screening and diagnosis for abnormal aortic arch in infants

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinjian He ◽  
Jiaoyang Chen ◽  
Gaoyang Li
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Subclavian Artery ◽  
Coarctation Of The Aorta ◽  
Double Aortic Arch ◽  
Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery ◽  
Coincidence Rate ◽  
Aortic Arch Anomalies ◽  
Screening Sensitivity ◽  
Axis View

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to explore echocardiographic views and methods of aortic arch anomalies in infants, so as to improve the screening sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. Methods 140 children with abnormal aortic arch diagnosed by ultrasound in Children’s Hospital of Hebei Province from January 2014 to December 2019 were selected for retrospective analysis. All were confirmed by surgery or/and computerized tomography angiography. Series of views for aortic arch (the three-vessel and tracheal view, aortic arch short axis view, left aortic arch long axis view, aortic arch long axis continuous scan views) were performed in all cases on the basis of the routine views of echocardiography. The screening sensitivity and diagnostic coincidence rate of different echocardiographic views for aortic arch anomalies were analyzed. Results Among the 140 infants, right aortic arch were 21 cases (6/21 were accompanied by mirror branch and 15/21 were with aberrant left subclavian artery). Left aortic arch with aberrant right subclavian artery were 2 cases, and double aortic arch with both arches open were 20 cases. Double aortic arch with left arch atresia were 2 cases, and atresia of the proximal aorta with aortic arch dysplasia was 1 case. Coarctation of the aorta were 67 cases, and interruption of aortic arch were 27 cases. All the patients were correctly diagnosed except that 2 infants with interruption of aortic arch were incorrectly diagnosed as coarctation of the aorta, and 1 infant with coarctation of the aorta was misdiagnosed as interruption of aortic arch by echocardiography. The screening sensitivities of four views and four-view combination for abnormal aortic arch were 99.3, 73.6, 87.1, 99.3, and 100%; the diagnostic coincidence rates were 85.7, 27.1,66.4, 95.0%, and 97.9% respectively. On the basis of traditional left aortic long axis view, other three views had their own advantages. The screening sensitivity and diagnostic coincidence rate of four-view combination were significantly improved. Conclusions The three-vessel trachea view is simple and feasible, which is suitable for screening abnormal aortic arch. The combination of four views conduces to improving screening sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of aortic arch abnormalities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document