scholarly journals Subcranial surgery of nasal CSF leak, endoscopic capabilities

2020 ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Orest Palamar ◽  
Andriy Huk ◽  
Dmytro Okonskyi ◽  
Ruslan Aksyonov ◽  
Dmytro Teslenko
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Bone Defect ◽  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Middle Cranial Fossa ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Invasive Method

Introduction: The problem of choosing surgical approach in the treatment of CSF leak is the subject of discussion depending of the location and the size of the bone defect of the skull base. Materials and methods: 37 patients with nasal CSF leak were treated. In 17 cases, nasal CSF leak was caused by meningo(encephalo)cele. Spontaneous nasal cerebrospinal fluid occurred in 14 cases. In 3 cases, nasal CSF leak was the result of traumatic brain injury (in one case, the cause of nasal CSF leak was post-traumatic meningoencephalocele of the frontal sinus); in the other 3 cases there was postoperative wound nasal cerebrospinal fluid. Results and discussion: Groups of patients were formed depending on the use of vascularized or moved (free) flaps: 1). Multilayer plastics of bone defects of the anterior and middle cranial fossae using displaced (free) flaps. 2). Multilayer plastic of bone defects of the anterior and middle cranial fossa using a nasoseptal flap or middle nasal concha on the leg. In all cases (100%) nasal CSF leak was eliminated. External lumbar drainage was performed in 6 patients and only in cases where the plastic of the bone defect was performed by displaced free flaps. Conclusions: 1). The use of endoscopic endonasal techniques is a minimally invasive method to close skull base bone defects (including large – more than 20 mm) in the area of the anterior and middle cranial fossae. 2). Subcranial approaches are expedient, effective and technically more convenient for nasal CSF leak defects of the frontal sinus and defects in the anterior cells of the etmoid bone.3). Vascularized flaps is expedient for plastic at middle (11-20 mm) and big (more than 20 mm) bone defects of skull base.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Endonasal Reconstruction of High-Flow Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak with Fascia Lata “Button” Graft and Nasoseptal Flap: Surgical Technique and Case Series

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (06) ◽  
pp. 645-650
Author(s):  
Roshni V. Khatiwala ◽  
Karthik S. Shastri ◽  
Maria Peris-Celda ◽  
Tyler Kenning ◽  
Carlos D. Pinheiro-Neto
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Fascia Lata ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Nasoseptal Flap ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Skull Base Reconstruction ◽  
Csf Diversion ◽  
Csf Leaks

Abstract Background The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has become increasingly used for resection of skull base tumors in the sellar and suprasellar regions. A nasoseptal flap (NSF) is routinely used for anterior skull base reconstruction; however, there are numerous additional allografts and autografts being used in conjunction with the NSF. The role of perioperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion is also unclear. Objective This study was aimed to analyze success of high-flow CSF leak repair during EEA procedures without use of CSF diversion through lumbar drainage. Methods A retrospective chart review of patients who had intraoperative high-flow CSF leak during EEA procedures at our institution between January 2013 and December 2017 was performed. CSF leaks were repaired with use of a fascia lata button graft and nasoseptal flap, without use of perioperative lumbar drains. Results A total of 38 patients were identified (10 male, 28 female). Patient BMIs ranged from 19.7 to 49 kg/m2 (median = 31 kg/m2), with 18 patients meeting criteria for obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) and 12 patients overweight (25 kg/m2 < BMI < 29.9 kg/m2). There was no incidence of postoperative CSF leak. Conclusion In our experience, the nasoseptal flap used in conjunction with the fascia lata button graft is a safe, effective and robust combination for cranial base reconstruction with high-flow intraoperative CSF leaks, without need for lumbar drains.

scholarly journals Stepwise Algorithm for Skull Base Reconstruction in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery: From the Simple to the Complex

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Belen Vega ◽  
Philippe Lavigne ◽  
Vanessa Hernandez-Hernandez ◽  
Aldo Eguiluz-Menendez ◽  
Eric Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Posterior Fossa ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Fat Graft ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery ◽  
Endonasal Surgery ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Skull Base Reconstruction ◽  
Skull Base Defects

Abstract INTRODUCTION The most frequent complication of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. This study was designed to develop a step-wise algorithm for EES reconstruction across the spectrum of skull base defects: from free mucosal graft for uncomplicated pituitary adenomas to free flaps in complex cases with recurrent leaks. METHODS All patients with skull base pathologies who underwent EES between January 2017 and December 2018 were included and retrospectively analyzed. Tumor location, reconstruction method and postoperative CSF leak were reviewed and a step-wise algorithm based on size and location of defect was developed. RESULTS Location of skull base defects was categorized as follows: anterior fossa, suprasellar, sellar and posterior fossa. For all nonsellar sites, we performed a multilayer (collagen matrix + /- fascia lata + /− fat graft + vascularized flap) reconstruction. The nasoseptal flap (NSF) was the first choice for vascularized reconstruction when available. For all sellar lesions we employed a free mucosal graft unless a high-flow CSF leak was present, in which case a single-layer reconstruction with NSF was performed. When the NSF was not available, alternative local (lateral nasal wall flap) and regional (extracranial pericranial flap) pedicled flaps were successful choices. When patients failed multiple attempts at repair, regional or microvascular free flaps were options. Lumbar spinal drainage was employed for large anterior and posterior fossa defects and during secondary repair of postoperative CSF leaks. Of 347 patients, 4.6% had a postoperative CSF leak. Of 158 patients with an intraoperative leak (45.5%), 10.1% developed a postoperative CSF leak: 7.8% for sellar/suprasellar defects and 13% for anterior/posterior fossa defects. CONCLUSION This algorithm provides a standardized, stepwise approach to the reconstruction of all skull base defects after EES based on location.

Endoscopic Endonasal Transethmoidal Transcribriform Transfovea Ethmoidalis Approach to the Anterior Cranial Fossa and Skull Base

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 883-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey P. Greenfield ◽  
Vijay K. Anand ◽  
Ashutosh Kacker ◽  
Michael J. Seibert ◽  
Ameet Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Sphenoid Sinus ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Anterior Skull Base ◽  
Anterior Cranial Fossa ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Lumbar Drainage ◽  
Cranial Fossa

Abstract OBJECTIVE The anterior skull base, in front of the sphenoid sinus, can be approached using a variety of techniques including extended subfrontal, transfacial, and craniofacial approaches. These methods include risks of brain retraction, contusion, cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, and cosmetic deformity. An alternate and more direct approach is the endonasal, transethmoidal, transcribriform, transfovea ethmoidalis approach. METHODS An endoscopic, endonasal approach was used to treat a variety of conditions of the anterior skull base arising in front of the sphenoid sinus and between the orbits in a series of 44 patients. A prospective database was used to detail the corridor of approach, closure technique, use of intraoperative lumbar drainage, operative time, and postoperative complications. Extent of resection was determined by a radiologist using volumetric analysis. RESULTS Pathology included meningo/encephaloceles (19), benign tumors (14), malignant tumors (9), and infectious lesions (2). Lumbar drains were placed intraoperatively in 20 patients. The CSF leak rate was 6.8% for the whole series and 9% for intradural cases. Leaks were effectively managed with lumbar drainage. Early reoperation for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred in 1 patient (2.2%). There were no intracranial infections. Greater than 98% resection was achieved in 12 of 14 benign and 5 of 9 malignant tumors. CONCLUSION The endoscopic, endonasal, transethmoidal, transcribriform, transfovea ethmoidalis approach is versatile and suitable for managing a variety of pathological entities. This minimal access surgery is a feasible alternative to transcranial, transfacial, or combined craniofacial approaches to the anterior skull base and anterior cranial fossa in front of the sphenoid sinus. The risk of CSF leak and infection are reasonably low and decrease with experience. Longer follow-up and larger series of patients will be required to validate the long-term efficacy of this minimally invasive approach.

scholarly journals Perfusion-based human cadaveric specimen as a simulation training model in repairing cerebrospinal fluid leaks during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 792-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eisha A. Christian ◽  
Joshua Bakhsheshian ◽  
Ben A. Strickland ◽  
Vance L. Fredrickson ◽  
Ian A. Buchanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Simulation Training ◽  
Training Model ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Psychomotor Skills ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Cadaveric Specimen ◽  
Csf Leaks

OBJECTIVECompetency in endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) to repair high-flow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks is an essential component of the neurosurgical training process. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of a simulation model for EEA repair of anterior skull base CSF leaks.METHODSHuman cadaveric specimens were utilized with a perfusion system to simulate a high-flow CSF leak. Neurological surgery residents (postgraduate year 3 or greater) performed a standard EEA to repair a CSF leak using a combination of fat, fascia lata, and pedicled nasoseptal flaps. A standardized 5-point Likert questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge gained, techniques learned, degree of safety, benefit of CSF perfusion during repair, and pre- and posttraining confidence scores.RESULTSIntrathecal perfusion of fluorescein-infused saline into the ventricular/subarachnoid space was successful in 9 of 9 cases. The addition of CSF reconstitution offered the residents visual feedback for confirmation of intraoperative CSF leak repair. Residents gained new knowledge and a realistic simulation experience by rehearsing the psychomotor skills and techniques required to repair a CSF leak with fat and fascial grafts, as well as to prepare and rotate vascularized nasoseptal flaps. All trainees reported feeling safer with the procedure in a clinical setting and higher average posttraining confidence scores (pretraining 2.22 ± 0.83, posttraining 4.22 ± 0.44, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSPerfusion-based human cadaveric models can be utilized as a simulation training model for repairing CSF leaks during EEA.

Endonasal Free Flap Reconstruction Combined With Draf Frontal Sinusotomy for Complex Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Technical Report & Case Series

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake J Lee ◽  
Elizabeth H Wick ◽  
Michael R Chicoine ◽  
Joshua L Dowling ◽  
Eric C Leuthardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Free Flap ◽  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Free Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Csf Leaks

Abstract BACKGROUND Frontal sinus cranialization with closure via bifrontal pericranial flaps is the gold standard for separating the nasofrontal recess from the intracranial cavity for posterior table defects. Despite the high success rate, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak may persist and is particularly challenging when vascularized reconstructive options from the bicoronal incision are exhausted. OBJECTIVE To assess a novel endonasal technique using an adipofascial radial forearm free flap delivered to the frontal recess through a Draf sinusotomy to repair complex CSF leaks from the frontal sinus. METHODS A retrospective review of 3 patients (all male; ages 42, 43, and 69 yr) with persistent CSF leak despite frontal sinus cranialization and repair with bifrontal pericranium was performed. Etiology of injury was traumatic in 2 patients and iatrogenic in 1 patient after anaplastic meningioma treatment. To create space for the flap and repair the nasofrontal ducts, endoscopic Draf III (Case 1, 3) or Draf IIb left frontal sinusotomy (Case 2) was performed. The forearm flap was harvested, passed through a Caldwell-Luc exposure, and placed within the Draf frontal sinustomy. The flap vessels were tunneled to the left neck and anastomosed to the facial vessels by the mandibular notch. RESULTS Intraoperatively, the flaps were well-seated and provided a watertight seal. Postoperative hospital courses were uncomplicated. There were no new CSF leaks or flap necrosis at 12, 14, and 16 mo. CONCLUSION Endoscopic endonasal free flap reconstruction through a Draf procedure is a novel viable option for persistent CSF leak after failed frontal sinus cranialization.

scholarly journals The Endoscopic Endonasal Management of Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (S 04) ◽  
pp. S300-S310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Guaraldi ◽  
Ernesto Pasquini ◽  
Giorgio Frank ◽  
Diego Mazzatenta ◽  
Matteo Zoli
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Anterior Skull Base ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Olfactory Groove ◽  
Skull Base Meningioma ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Tuberculum Sellae ◽  
Skull Base Meningiomas

Introduction The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) might seem an “unnatural” route for intradural lesions such as meningiomas. The aim of this study is to critically revise our management of anterior skull base meningiomas to consider, in what cases it may be advantageous. Material and Methods Each consecutive case of anterior skull base meningioma operated on through an EEA or combined endoscopic–transcranial approach at our institution, between 2003 and 2017, have been included. Tumors were classified on the basis of their location and intra or extracranial extension. Follow-up consisted of an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and a clinical examination 3 months after the surgery and then repeated annually. Results Fifty-seven patients were included. The most common location was the tuberculum sellae (62%), followed by olfactory groove (14%), planum sphenoidale (12%), and frontal sinus (12%). Among these, 65% were intracranial, 7% were extracranial, and 28% both intra and extracranial. Radical removal was achieved in 44 cases (77%). Complications consisted in 10 CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) leaks (17.6%), 1 overpacking (1.7%), and 1 asymptomatic brain ischemia (1.7%). Visual acuity and campimetric deficits improved respectively in 67 and 76% of patients. Recurrence rate was of 14%. Conclusions EEA presents many advantages in selected cases of anterior skull base meningioma. However, it is hampered by the relevant risk of CSF leak. We consider that it could be advantageous for planum/tuberculum sellae tumors. Conversely, for olfactory groove or frontal sinus meningiomas, it can be indicated for tumors with extracranial extension, while its role is still debatable for purely intracranial forms as considering our surgical results, it could be advantageous for midline planum/tuberculum sellae tumors. Conversely, it can be of first choice for olfactory groove or frontal sinus meningiomas with extracranial extension, while its role for purely intracranial forms is still debatable.

scholarly journals Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea in young women after 6.5 years of therapy giant prolactinoma with Cabergolin

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 201-208
Author(s):  
Ludmila I. Astafyeva ◽  
Boris A. Kadashev ◽  
Pavel L. Kalinin ◽  
Maxim A. Kutin ◽  
Yuliya G. Sidneva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Prolactin Level ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Complete Regression ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Giant Prolactinoma ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Case Closure

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a rare complication in of the prolactinomas treatment with dopamine agonists. In most cases CSF leak develops within the first three months of treatment starting. The article presents a rare clinical case – later development of CSF leak after pharmacological treatment of giant prolactinoma. Women 29 years with giant endo-supra-infra-laterasellar pituitary adenoma (8,7 cm in diameter), visual impairment, cachexia, secondary amenorrhea and prolactin level more than 2 million 200 thousand mU/l treated with cabergoline. On this background, complete regression of the tumor, recovery of visual function, body mass and normalization of prolactin level was marked. Nevertheless, after 6.5 years after beginning of cabergoline therapy CSF leak occured, which required endoscopic endonasal surgery with the plastic of a CSF fistula. All patients with large and giant prolactinomas which invade into skull base structures, receiving cabergoline even for a long time, should be aware of the possibility of such complications as CSF leak and, if necessary, should urgent appeals to the otolaryngologist and the neurosurgeon. In this case closure of skull base defect is a main tactics of treatment.

scholarly journals Cerebrospinal fluid leakage due to nasoseptal flap partial necrosis: A pitfall for skull base reconstruction of endoscopic endonasal surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Hiroki Yamada ◽  
Masahiro Toda ◽  
Mariko Fukumura ◽  
Ryotaro Imai ◽  
Hiroyuki Ozawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage ◽  
Flap Necrosis ◽  
Nasoseptal Flap ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Skull Base Reconstruction ◽  
Partial Necrosis ◽  
Necrotic Region

Background: Vascularized nasoseptal flaps allow for the reconstruction of large dural defects and have remarkably reduced the incidence of postoperative complications during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Nevertheless, some complications related to nasoseptal flap have been reported. Flap necrosis is a rare, but serious issue is associated with meningitis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Case Description: We performed endoscopic endonasal removal of the tuberculum sella meningioma in a 39-year-old woman with a history of Turner syndrome using abdominal fat, fascia, and a vascularized nasoseptal flap for dural and skull base defect reconstruction. After surgery, she developed CSF leak, and reoperation revealed partial necrosis of the septal flap that caused leakage. At this time, with a concern that removal of the necrotic part may lead to the insufficient size of the flap, we filled the gap tightly with fat pieces. However, the CSF leak recurred, and thus, we performed debridement of the necrotic region and reformed the multilayered reconstruction, following which she no longer experienced CSF leakage. Conclusion: Our case suggested that partial rather than total flap necrosis could occur, possibly due to variances of vascular anatomy, leading to focal ischemia. Debridement of the necrotic region may be an important solution for recurrent cerebrospinal leakage secondary to partial necrosis of a nasoseptal flap.

From research to clinical practice: long-term impact of randomized clinical trial examining the effect of lumbar drains on cerebrospinal fluid leak rates following endonasal skull base surgery.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Lavigne ◽  
paul gardner ◽  
Eric W Wang ◽  
Carl H. Snyderman
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Posterior Cranial Fossa ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cranial Fossa ◽  
Csf Diversion ◽  
Csf Leaks

Intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are associated with increased risk of post-operative CSF leaks despite multilayered reconstruction with vascularized tissue. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining the use of peri-operative lumbar drains (LD) in high-risk skull base defects identified a significant reduction in post-operative CSF leak incidence (21.2% vs. 8.2%; p=0.017). This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of the selective use of CSF diversion, for patients with intraoperative CSF leaks involving endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to the skull base. Method: Consecutive endoscopic endonasal surgeries of the skull base from a pre-RCT cohort and post-RCT cohort were compared. The following case characteristics between the two cohorts were examined: patient age, body mass index (BMI), rate of revision surgery, tumor histology, use of CSF diversion, and vascularized reconstruction. The primary measured outcome was post-operative CSF leak. Results: The pre-RCT cohort included 76 patients and the post-RCT cohort, 77 patients, with dural defects in either the anterior or posterior cranial fossa (pituitary and parasellar/suprasellar surgeries excluded). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of post-operative CSF leak in the post-RCT cohort (27.6% vs. 12.9%; p=0.04). On subgroup analysis, there was a trend toward improvement in CSF leak rate of the anterior cranial fossa (19.2% vs 10.5%; p=0.27) whereas CSF leak rates of the posterior cranial fossa were significantly reduced compared to the pre-RCT cohort (41.4% vs 12.8%; p=0.02). Conclusion This study demonstrates that the integration of selective CSF diversion into the reconstructive algorithm improved post-operative CSF leak rates.

Study on Closure of Skull Base Defect Post–Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoid Pituitary Surgery: A Novel Flap Design

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gokul Gopi ◽  
Saurav Sarkar ◽  
Sudipta Mohakud ◽  
Ashis Patnaik ◽  
Sumit Bansal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Pituitary Tumors ◽  
Pituitary Surgery ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Flap Repair ◽  
Skull Base Defect ◽  
Nasal Septal Flap

Abstract Objective This study was aimed to compare the closure of skull base defect in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoid surgery of pituitary tumors, using bipedicled nasal septal flap versus fascial closure. The study hypothesis being that bipedicled nasal septal flap is better, compared with fascial closure of skull base defect post–endoscopic endonasal transsphenoid surgery of pituitary tumors. Methods All the eligible patients were randomly divided into two groups and then randomly allocated to the surgeons. In one group, fat and fascia lata was used for closure of the skull base defect and nasal septal flap was not harvested whereas in the other, nasal septal flap was used for closure. Result There was a statistically significant difference in postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak between the two groups. Patients who had undergone flap repair had lower incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Duration of postoperative hospital stay was also less among the group who underwent flap repair (statistically significant). Conclusion Bipedicled nasal septal flap serves an excellent cover for the skull base defect following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. It can prevent postoperative CSF leak even in cases where tissue glue is not used.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document