Prediction of Polyadenylation in Human Gene Sequences

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 927-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun LIAO ◽  
Jiang-Bo DUAN ◽  
Yan-Hong ZHOU
Keyword(s):  
1995 ◽  
Vol 308 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Passadore ◽  
N Bianchi ◽  
G Feriotto ◽  
C Mischiati ◽  
P Giacomini ◽  
...  

In this report we analyse the effects of distamycin and five distamycin analogues on amplification by polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) of two gene sequences displaying a different A+T/G+C content. The first was a 5′ region of the human oestrogen receptor (ER) gene, containing a (TA)26 stretch; the second was a CG-rich sequence of the human Ha-ras oncogene. The results obtained unequivocally demonstrate that the addition of one pyrrole ring significantly improves the ability of distamycin derivatives to interfere with PCR-mediated amplification of the human ER genomic region carrying a (TA)26 stretch. The distamycin analogues analysed differ in the number of pyrrole rings and in the presence of an N-formyl, an N-formimidoyl or a retroamide group at position X1. Among compounds carrying the same number of pyrrole rings, those carrying an N-formyl or an N-formimidoyl group retain a similar inhibitory activity. The retroamide analogues, on the contrary, are much less efficient in inhibiting PCR-mediated amplification of the 5′ER region. With respect to sequence selectivity both distamycin and distamycin analogues exhibit a sequence preference, since they do not inhibit PCR amplification of Ha-ras CG-rich gene regions, with the exception of a distamycin analogue carrying four pyrrole rings.


In Vivo ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3 suppl) ◽  
pp. 1633-1636
Author(s):  
STEVEN LEHRER ◽  
PETER H. RHEINSTEIN
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Roger D. Klein

Overview: The use of genetic information to design and guide therapies and to develop novel diagnostic procedures creates important patent issues. Patents on human gene sequences have likely helped stimulate the introduction of new biologics; however, their role and that of patents on genotype-phenotype correlations in diagnostic testing is highly controversial. Genotype-phenotype associations are at the heart of personalized medicine. The intellectual property rules by which these biologic relationships are governed have profound implications for the growth of individualized medicine.


1988 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsiao-chen Chang ◽  
Douglas J. Jolly ◽  
Eva Biro ◽  
Oliver W. Jones ◽  
Theodore Friedmann

1997 ◽  
Vol 319 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 317-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Passadore ◽  
Nicoletta Bianchi ◽  
Giordana Feriotto ◽  
Carlo Mischiati ◽  
Cristina Rutigliano ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Ann

Whether patents should be granted on human genes or gene sequences is highly controversial, both ethically and politically; not only in Germany but throughout Europe and in most parts of the world. Proof of this has been the attention created by US biotechnology company Myriad Genetics, which, in 2001, obtained European patents for human gene sequences indicating an increased risk of certain types of cancer. In Germany the Bundestag has recently addressed the issue: the core of a newly introduced provision of the German Patent Statute (PatG) is Paragraph 1a Sec. 4 PatG, which limits the scope of patent protection available for human gene sequences or parts thereof. If the subject of an invention is a human gene sequence, Paragraph 1a Sec. 4 PatG requires disclosure of not only the sequence but also at least one application. Without such disclosure a human gene sequence is not patentable under German Patent Law. This is remarkable, because under the Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions, the so-called Biotechnology Directive of 1998, a piece of European Union legislation, the situation is different.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document