scholarly journals The Development of Fine Motor Skills and its Relation to Cognitive Development in Young Children

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 261
Author(s):  
Da GENG ◽  
Xingli ZHANG ◽  
Jiannong SHI
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Betsy Diamant-Cohen ◽  
Katie Scherrer

Using movement in the storytime setting is not new. Most presenters know that, at minimum, movement is a great tool for helping young children “get the wiggles out” and have fun before resettling for the parts of the program that require more attention and focus.However, much like the use of songs, props, and conversation in the days before youth services staff were well-versed in the development of early literacy competencies, the use of movement in storytime is often intuitive rather than intentional. The great news is that these instincts to utilize movement are right on track! Not only does movement help children build gross and fine motor skills, emerging research indicates combining movement with early literacy practices actually boosts early literacy development as well.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 569-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemieke M. Reimer ◽  
Ralf F. A. Cox ◽  
F. Nienke Boonstra ◽  
Maria W. G. Nijhuis-van der Sanden

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Hidelbrando S. Souto ◽  
Juliana Nunes Santos ◽  
Hércules Ribeiro Leite ◽  
Mijna Hadders-Algra ◽  
Sabrina Conceição Guedes ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca E. Winter ◽  
Heidrun Stoeger ◽  
Sebastian P. Suggate

Children’s fine motor skills (FMS) link to cognitive development, however, research on their involvement in language processing, also with adults, is scarce. Lexical items are processed differently depending on the degree of sensorimotor information inherent in the words’ meanings, such as whether these imply a body-object interaction (BOI) or a body-part association (i.e., hand, arm, mouth, foot). Accordingly, three studies examined whether lexical processing was affected by FMS, BOIness, and body-part associations in children (study 1, n = 77) and adults (study 2, n = 80; study 3, n = 71). Analyses showed a differential link between FMS and lexical processing as a function of age. Whereas response latencies indicated that children’s FMS were associated with “hand” words, adults’ FMS linked to the broader concept of BOI. Findings have implications for shared activation theories positing that FMS support lexical processing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document