3. Communication of Military Couples During Deployment: Topic Avoidance and Relational Uncertainty

2011 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandi N. Frisby ◽  
Kerry Byrnes ◽  
Daniel H. Mansson ◽  
Melanie Booth-Butterfield ◽  
Meagan K. Birmingham

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia L. Mikucki-Enyart ◽  
John P. Caughlin

This study focuses on the transition to extended family that occurs as marriage creates in-law relationships along with the spousal unit. Specifically, it utilizes both the relational turbulence model and the multiple goals perspective to examine variations in communication avoidance and satisfaction with one’s in-law relationship. Our model proposes that key mechanisms of relational turbulence (i.e., relational uncertainty and interference from partners) are associated with in-law’s communicative goals (such as managing uncertainty, fostering a positive in-law identity, and maintaining family relationships), which in turn are associated with topic avoidance. In addition, we hypothesized that relational uncertainty, interference from partners, and the use of topic avoidance would be associated with dissatisfaction in nascent in-law bonds. A cross-sectional analysis of data from 203 children-in-law revealed that in addition to direct associations among relational uncertainty, interference from partners, topic avoidance, and satisfaction, children-in-law’s uncertainty management goals mediated a portion of the association between the mechanisms of turbulence and topic avoidance. These findings are consistent with our proposed model, suggesting important implications for our understanding of the transition to extended family, as well as our understanding of relational turbulence and multiple goals in in-law relationships.


2013 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 452-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne K. Knobloch ◽  
Aaron T. Ebata ◽  
Patricia C. McGlaughlin ◽  
Jennifer A. Theiss

2020 ◽  
pp. 026540752097064
Author(s):  
Leanne K. Knobloch ◽  
Lynne M. Knobloch-Fedders ◽  
Jeremy B. Yorgason ◽  
Erin D. Basinger ◽  
Bryan Abendschein ◽  
...  

Relational uncertainty is both prominent and pivotal during the transition from deployment to reintegration. Most prior research has considered the outcomes rather than the origins of relational uncertainty, hampering the development of interventions for military couples. We theorize about two predictors of relational uncertainty during the post-deployment transition: suspicion about a partner’s deception and trust. Results of an 8-wave longitudinal study involving 287 U.S. military couples ( N = 4,147 observations) revealed that relational uncertainty increased over the transition for both returning service members and at-home partners. Suspicion about a partner’s deception, and particularly trust, predicted the relational uncertainty of military couples at homecoming and over time. These findings advance knowledge about the roots of relational uncertainty and suggest ways to assist military couples upon reunion.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lysander James Montilla Doble ◽  
Reiniero Gutierrez

In between relationships (IBRs) constitute relationships that overlap between friendships and romantic relationships. They are characterized by definitional uncertainty, as well as the other types of relational uncertainty identified by Knobloch and Solomon (1999). The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews among emerging adults with ongoing or terminated IBRs. Topic avoidance reinforced the prevalent relational uncertainty among IBRs. Being in an IBR had advantages, such as companionship, perceived safety, and positive feelings, that motivated emerging adults to initiate and maintain them. However, the disadvantages that followed, such as stress, lack of exclusivity, and negative feelings, became a contributing factor to its termination. The researchers also proposed three types of IBRS, and conceptualized a framework that illustrates the development of IBRs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne K. Knobloch ◽  
Liesel L. Sharabi ◽  
Amy L. Delaney ◽  
Samantha M. Suranne

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Stein

Abstract Relational turbulence theory (RTT) proposes causal relationships across cognitive, emotional and communicative variables. Although many tenets of this theory have been tested individually, there has not yet been a comprehensive, predictive examination of RTT. Using structural equation modelling, this study longitudinally tested several propositions and axioms of RTT. Results are largely in line with many of RTT's predictions. Time 1 relational uncertainty predicted time 2 biased cognitions. Time 1 facilitation from a partner predicted time 2 negative emotions. Negative emotions cross-sectionally related to both the enactment and valence of relational communication episodes. Relational turbulence theory's proposed feedback loop received partial support, such that time 1 communication valence (but not engagement) predicted time 2 partner uncertainty, relationship uncertainty and partner facilitation. Results are discussed in terms of theory expansion and refinement.


2020 ◽  
pp. 009365022095822
Author(s):  
Amy L. Delaney

Couples coping with depression are prone to unique and pervasive sexual intimacy challenges and experience troubles communicating effectively. Successful sexual communication improves sexual and relationship satisfaction, making communication particularly important for couples facing sexual difficulties. In this study, the relational turbulence model serves as a framework to examine associations between sexual communication and both sexual and relationship satisfaction in couples ( N = 106) in which one or both partners live with depression. Results of a cross-sectional survey suggest sexual communication mediates relationships between both relational uncertainty and interference from a partner with sexual/relationship satisfaction. Results illuminate functions of communication about sex as couples navigate sexual and relational effects of depression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document