Overshadowing and associability change: Examining the contribution of differential stimulus exposure

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Peter M. Jones ◽  
Mark Haselgrove
2004 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen D. Szalda-Petree ◽  
Baine B. Craft ◽  
Lori M. Martin ◽  
Heide K. Deditius-Island

2018 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Cummins ◽  
Bryan Roche ◽  
Ian Tyndall ◽  
Aoife Cartwright

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-346
Author(s):  
Bill J. Locke

This study investigated the effects of stimulus presentation rate in a Taffel-type verbal conditioning paradigm. College Ss were required to emit sentences utilizing a verb and one of six pronouns on each of 80 stimulus cards. Rate of stimulus presentation was varied in two ways: presentation of a card every 7 sec. (Fixed rate) and presentation immediately subsequent to each reponse (Variable rate). Presentation rate was factorially varied with presence or absence of response-contingent verbal reinforcement. Greater increments in reinforced response frequency occurred under Fixed than Variable procedures but conditioning effects were obtained independent of presentation rate.


2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy H. Y. Chiu ◽  
Alan H. S. Chan

2015 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 928-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverly A. Wright ◽  
Melissa M. Baese-Berk ◽  
Nicole Marrone ◽  
Ann R. Bradlow

1983 ◽  
Vol 35 (2b) ◽  
pp. 135-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Hall ◽  
Stephen Channell

In two experiments rats were trained on a simultaneous discrimination in a jumping stand. On each trial choice always lay between one stimulus (an obliquely striped object in Experiment I, and a plain grey object in Experiment II) and a second that varied from trial to trial. On half the trials this variable stimulus bore horizontal stripes (H) and on the remaining trials it bore vertical stripes (V). It was argued that the solution of this discrimination would be hindered if the animals tended to classify H and V apart (Bateson and Chantrey, 1972). It was found, however, that prior exposure to H and V in the home cage (which has been supposed to promote classifying apart) facilitated learning and that prior exposure to H and V in the apparatus itself (which might be thought to promote classifying together) hindered later learning. Possible alternative accounts for these exposure learning effects are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document