scholarly journals Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1374-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Yao ◽  
Jia Wu ◽  
Yanyan Zhang ◽  
Zhenhong Wang
Keyword(s):  
1988 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 499-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula J Schwanenflugel ◽  
Katherine Kip Harnishfeger ◽  
Randall W Stowe

1989 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula J. Schwanenflugel ◽  
Randall W. Stowe

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Jessen ◽  
R. Heun ◽  
M. Erb ◽  
D.-O. Granath ◽  
U. Klose ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (21) ◽  
pp. e135-e135
Author(s):  
Maxim Ivanov ◽  
Mikhail Ivanov ◽  
Artem Kasianov ◽  
Ekaterina Rozhavskaya ◽  
Sergey Musienko ◽  
...  

Abstract As the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the Mendelian diseases diagnosis is expanding, the performance of this method has to be improved in order to achieve higher quality. Typically, performance measures are considered to be designed in the context of each application and, therefore, account for a spectrum of clinically relevant variants. We present EphaGen, a new computational methodology for bioinformatics quality control (QC). Given a single NGS dataset in BAM format and a pre-compiled VCF-file of targeted clinically relevant variants it associates this dataset with a single arbiter parameter. Intrinsically, EphaGen estimates the probability to miss any variant from the defined spectrum within a particular NGS dataset. Such performance measure virtually resembles the diagnostic sensitivity of given NGS dataset. Here we present case studies of the use of EphaGen in context of BRCA1/2 and CFTR sequencing in a series of 14 runs across 43 blood samples and 504 publically available NGS datasets. EphaGen is superior to conventional bioinformatics metrics such as coverage depth and coverage uniformity. We recommend using this software as a QC step in NGS studies in the clinical context. Availability: https://github.com/m4merg/EphaGen or https://hub.docker.com/r/m4merg/ephagen.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1297-1313
Author(s):  
Caitlin A. Rice ◽  
Natasha Tokowicz ◽  
Scott H. Fraundorf ◽  
Teljer L. Liburd

1992 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula J. Schwanenflugel ◽  
Carolyn Akin ◽  
Wei-Ming Luh

1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet G. van Hell ◽  
Annette M. B. de Groot

This study examines contrasting predictions of the dual coding theory and the context availability hypothesis regarding concreteness effects in monolingual and bilingual lexical processing. In three experiments, concreteness was controlled for or confounded with rated context availability. In the first experiment, bilingual subjects performed lexical decision in their native language (Dutch, L1). In the second experiment, lexical decision performance of bilinguals in their second language (English, L2) was examined. In the third experiment, bilinguals translated words “forwards” (from L1 to L2) or “backwards” (from L2 to L1). Both monolingual and bilingual tasks showed a concreteness effect when concreteness was confounded with context availability. However, concreteness effects disappeared when abstract and concrete words were matched on context availability, and even occasionally reversed. Implications of these results for theories that account for concreteness effects, particulary in bilingual processing, are discussed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Mestres-Missé ◽  
Thomas F Münte ◽  
Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells

In three experiments, we examine the effects of semantic context and word concreteness on the mapping of existing meanings to new words. We developed a new-word-learning paradigm in which participants were required to discover the meaning of a new-word form from a specific verbal context. The stimulus materials were manipulated according to word concreteness, context availability and semantic congruency across contexts. Overall, participants successfully learned the meaning of the new word whether it was a concrete or an abstract word. Concrete word meanings were discovered and learned faster than abstract word meanings even when matched on context availability. The present results are discussed considering the various hypotheses that have been used to try to explain the ‘concreteness effect’. We conclude that the present investigation provides new evidence that the concreteness effect observed in learning is due to the different organization of abstract and concrete conceptual information in semantic memory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document