Not all Equals are Equal: Decoupling Thinking Processes and Results in Mathematical Assessments
One of the greatest challenges in mathematics education is in fostering an understanding of what mathematicians would recognise as “mathematical thought.” We seek to encourage students to develop the transferable skills of abstraction, problem generalization and scalability as opposed to simply answering the specific question posed. This difference is perhaps best illustrated by the famous – but likely apocryphal – tale of Gauss’s school days and his approach to summing all positive integers up to and including 100, rather than just summing each sequentially. Especially with the rise of technology-enabled marking and results-focussed tutoring services, the onus is on the educator to develop new types of question which encourage and reward the development of mathematical processes and deprioritise results alone. Some initial work in this area is presented here.