Atresia and Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 241-248
Author(s):  
Steven P. Smith ◽  
Simon Milov ◽  
Joel A. Goebel
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Bone Anchored Hearing Aid ◽  
The Right ◽  
Conductive Hearing

This case study summarizes findings in an adult male, aged 57, who presented to the Adult Audiology Clinic with aural atresia in the right ear resulting in a conductive hearing loss and a sudden sensorineural hearing loss in the left ear. Treatment options included reconstruction surgery in the right ear, bone anchored hearing aid in the right ear to overcome the conductive hearing loss, bone anchored hearing aid in the left ear for single sided deafness, and intratympanic steroid injections in the left ear to salvage hearing.This case study highlights that when a patient is educated on all available options the patient is then able to make a decision comfortable to him and to help improve his hearing.

scholarly journals Assess the hearing of contralateral ear in patients with unilateral chronic squamosal otitis media

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 886
Author(s):  
Raphella Khan ◽  
Anirudh Kasliwal
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Otitis Media ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Retraction Pocket ◽  
Mixed Hearing Loss ◽  
Contralateral Ear ◽  
The Right ◽  
Conductive Hearing

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Chronic squamosal otitis media can occur due to many conditions affecting the middle ear. Most common sign of developing a chronic squamosal otitis media is formation of a retraction pocket in the tympanic membrane leading to further development of a cholesteatoma and if not treated properly, may lead to development of dangerous complication in the affected ear. These etiological factors may also affect the other ear. It is therefore very necessary to assess and diagnose the contralateral ear, so that the disease can be intervened and treated at the right time, to prevent any deterioration in hearing of the contralateral ear.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The prospective study was done in 100 patients with unilateral chronic squamosal otitis media, where the contra lateral ear was examined and assessed for any hearing loss.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> We found hearing loss in the contra lateral ear ranging from mild conductive hearing loss to sensorineural hearing loss with the maximum patients with mild conductive hearing loss (42%) and lowest in sensorineural hearing loss (1%).  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In our study, 76 patients were seen with conductive hearing loss. Out of that, 42% patients were seen with mild conductive hearing loss, 30% with moderate conductive hearing loss and 4% with severe conductive hearing loss. 20% patients were seen with normal hearing. 3% patients were seen with mixed hearing loss and only 1% patient was seen with sensorineural hearing loss in contralateral ear.</p>

An approach to bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in children: contralateral placement of sleeper fixture

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Bernstein ◽  
P Z Sheehan
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Calvarial Bone ◽  
Optimal Position ◽  
Bone Anchored Hearing Aid ◽  
Conductive Hearing

AbstractObjective:Bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in younger children is a two-stage procedure, with a titanium fixture being allowed to osseointegrate for several months before an abutment is fitted through a skin graft. In the first procedure, it has been usual to place a reserve or sleeper fixture approximately 5 mm from the primary fixture as a backup in case the primary fixture fails to osseointegrate. This ipsilateral sleeper fixture is expensive, is often not used, and is placed in thinner calvarial bone where it is less likely to osseointegrate successfully. The authors have implanted the sleeper fixture on the contralateral side, with the additional objective of reducing the number of procedures for bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid implantation, providing a cost-effective use for the sleeper.Methods:The authors implanted the bone-anchored hearing aid sleeper fixture in the contralateral temporal bone instead of on the ipsilateral side in seven successive paediatric cases with bilateral conductive hearing loss requiring two-stage bone-anchored hearing aids, treated at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, UK.Results:The seven patients ranged in age from five to 15 years, with a mean age of 10 years; in addition, a 20-year-old with learning disability was also treated. In each case, the contralateral sleeper fixture was not needed as a backup fixture, but was used in four patients (57 per cent) as the basis for a second-side bone-anchored hearing aid.Conclusions:In children with bilateral conductive hearing loss, in whom a bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid is being considered and the second side is to be operated upon at a later date, we recommend placing the sleeper fixture on the contralateral side at the time of primary first-side surgery. Our technique provides a sleeper fixture located in an optimal position, where it also offers the option of use for a second-side bone-anchored hearing aid and reduces the number of procedures needed.

A Smartphone-Based Weber Test May Discriminate between a Conductive and a Sensorineural Hearing Loss

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-196
Author(s):  
Omer J. Ungar ◽  
Ophir Handzel ◽  
Oren Cavel ◽  
Yahav Oron
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Tuning Fork ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Unilateral Hearing Loss ◽  
Conductive Hearing

Objective: The aim of this paper was to compare the accuracy of a smartphone-based Weber test (SPWT) with the traditional tuning fork Weber test (TFWT) in identifying and differentiating between sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and conductive hearing loss (CHL). Study Design: We conducted a prospective, noncontrolled clinical study. Methods: Sixty patients referred to the emergency department due to unilateral hearing loss (HL) were enrolled. They were asked to press a single uncovered smartphone on their forehead and conduct a Weber test by means of the smartphone’s vibration application. The results were compared to the TFWT. Results: Twenty-six (43%) patients were diagnosed with a SNHL, and 34 (57%) with a CHL. The SPWT was in agreement with the TFWT (at a frequency of 512 Hz) in 55 (92%) patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the TFWT were 84.6 and 94.1%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the SPWT were 76.9 and 97.1%, respectively. Conclusion: SPWT can serve as an auxiliary diagnostic tool in the absence of a 512-Hz tuning fork to assist in the identification of the type of HL and to potentially hasten the diagnosis and provision of treatment when indicated.

Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss Rehabilitation

1991 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 771-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Bradley Welling ◽  
Michael E. Glasscock ◽  
Charles I. Woods ◽  
Ronald C. Sheffey
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Conductive Hearing

The Audiant Bone Conductor has been heralded as an aid for use in conductive hearing loss; however, its possible use in unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has also been proposed. Between July 1987 and July 1989, profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss has been rehabilitated In 43 patients using the Xomed Audiant Bone Conductor. Patients who were willing to participate in this clinical trial and who were felt to be good contralateral routing of signals (CROS) aid candidates were selected preoperatively. Audiometric followup, selection criteria, patient satisfaction, and complications are discussed.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss: when is it idiopathic?

2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 690-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Wilson ◽  
D J Alderson
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Liver Function Tests ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Relative Uncertainty ◽  
The Right

AbstractObjective: To highlight the importance of assessing the certainty of a diagnosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, and of modifying patient management accordingly.Case report: A patient presented with sudden sensorineural hearing loss in the right ear. Following assessment and preliminary investigation, a diagnosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss was made. Steroid treatment was commenced. Two weeks later, the patient experienced sudden sensorineural hearing loss in the left ear, and scalp tenderness. Subsequent biopsy confirmed giant cell arteritis.Conclusions: Management of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss should be guided by the level of certainty of diagnosis. If there is relative uncertainty, risk factors for specific diagnoses should be sought, the patient should be followed more closely, and investigation should be tailored appropriately. Giant cell arteritis should be considered in patients older than 50 years, those exhibiting suggestive signs or symptoms, and those with elevated inflammatory markers or deranged liver function tests.

Patterns of hearing loss in non-explosive blast injury of the ear

1997 ◽  
Vol 111 (12) ◽  
pp. 1137-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilead Berger ◽  
Yehuda Finkelstein ◽  
Shabtai Avraham ◽  
Mordehai Himmelfarb
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Ossicular Chain ◽  
Blast Injury ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Conductive Hearing

AbstractA prospective study of hearing loss in 120 cases with non-explosive blast injury of the ear, gathered over a six-year period, is presented. Thirty-three (27.5 per cent) patients had normal hearing, 57 (47.5 per cent) conductive hearing loss, 29 (24.2 per cent) mixed loss and one (0.8 per cent) had pure sensorineural loss. The severity of conductive hearing loss correlated with the size of the eardrum perforation; only a marginal difference was found between water and air pressure injuries, with respect to this type of hearing loss. Of all locations, perforations involving the posterior-inferior quadrant of the eardrum were associated with the largest air-bone gap. Audiometric assessment revealed that none of the patients suffered ossicular chain damage. Three patterns of sensorineural hearing loss were identified: a dip at a single frequency, two separate dips, and abnormality of bone conduction in several adjacent high frequencies. Involvement of several frequencies was associated with a more severe hearing loss than a dip in a single frequency. Healing of the perforation was always accompanied by closure of the air-bone gap, while the recovery of the sensorineural hearing loss was less favourable.

scholarly journals Effects of Radiotherapy on Auditory and Vestibular Function

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Sachin Sharad Nilakhe
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Vestibular Dysfunction ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Head And Neck Malignancies ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Conductive Hearing

ABSTRACT Introduction Radiotherapy either primary or adjuvant, is a commonly used modality of treatment in head and neck malignancies. The audiovestibular apparatus is often within the fields of radiation treatment, and hearing loss is a possible complication. This study was undertaken to assess the audiovestibular functions in patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies to determine the type and severity of hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction following radiation therapy. Materials and methods Fifty patients with head and neck malignancies reported to the malignant disease treatment center of INHS Asvini and received radiotherapy as a primary modality of treatment or in combination with surgery during the period May 2003 to Sep 2004 were included in this study. None of these patients had prior treatment by chemotherapy. Conclusion A significant number of patients who were subjected to radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies develop conductive hearing loss is predominant in the immediate postradiation period. Conductive hearing loss is reversible and improves with the conservative line of treatment. Sensorineural hearing loss more commonly affects the higher frequencies and is more common in older patients. Sensorineural hearing loss is more common when radiation doses exceed 60 Gy. There is no conclusive evidence of vestibular dysfunction in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancers.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss posthypothyroidism: A case study

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Chandni Jain ◽  
PriyaKarimuddanahally Premkumar ◽  
Varsha Vijayan ◽  
RajithBegur Nataraj
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing

The Wildervanck Syndrome: Cervico-Oculo-Acoustic Dysplasia

1979 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 892-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Eisemann ◽  
Gopesh K. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Lateral Rectus ◽  
Basilar Impression ◽  
Conductive Hearing

The Wildervanck syndrome consists of the Klippel-Feil deformity of the spine, eyeball retraction, lateral gaze weakness, and hearing loss. Conductive hearing loss, as well as a more frequently occurring sensorineural hearing loss, is caused by dysplasia of the inner ear. Typically, polytomograms demonstrate a bulbous vestibule and dilated lateral semicircular canals with basilar impression of the skull. The Duane's eyeball retraction phenomenon completes the syndrome; this may be explained either by misdirected innervation of the extra-ocular muscles or by atrophy or fibrosis of the lateral rectus muscles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document