A new method is introduced that allows meteor radars to potentially produce height-dependent temperatures, rather than simply averages over the meteor region. The method is applied to data from the Clovar radar, near London, Ontario, and then a three-way comparison between Rayleigh lidar temperatures, hydroxyl temperatures, and meteor temperatures is undertaken. The three methods prove to be complementary. The OH measurements have good accuracy, but suffer slightly from lack of precise knowledge about their height and the fact that they are effectively integrated over the depth of the OH layer. The lidar temperatures are measured at well-defined altitudes and have better accuracy than the meteor method. The meteor temperatures have the largest errors, but still provide sufficient accuracy for many types of atmospheric studies, and have the advantage that these measurements can be made 24 h a day and in all sky conditions (including during cloud and strong sunlight and moonlight). The measurements from these instruments are complementary in that they are useful for studying the temperature on different time and altitude scales. PACS No.: 94.10.Dy
11 Years of Rayleigh Lidar Observations of Gravity Wave Activity Above the Southern Tip of South America
