scholarly journals Internal Gravity Waves in the Magnetized Solar Atmosphere. I. Magnetic Field Effects

2017 ◽  
Vol 835 (2) ◽  
pp. 148 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Vigeesh ◽  
J. Jackiewicz ◽  
O. Steiner
2020 ◽  
Vol 633 ◽  
pp. A140
Author(s):  
G. Vigeesh ◽  
M. Roth

Aims. We study the properties of internal gravity waves (IGWs) detected in synthetic observations that are obtained from realistic numerical simulation of the solar atmosphere. Methods. We used four different simulations of the solar magneto-convection performed using the CO5BOLD code. A magnetic-field-free model and three magnetic models were simulated. The latter three models start with an initial vertical, homogeneous field of 10, 50, and 100 G magnetic flux density, representing different regions of the quiet solar surface. We used the NICOLE code to compute synthetic spectral maps from all the simulated models for the two magnetically insensitive neutral iron lines Fe I λλ 5434 Å and 5576 Å. We carried out Fourier analyses of the intensity and Doppler velocities to derive the power, phase, and coherence in the kh − ω diagnostic diagram to study the properties of internal gravity waves. Results. We find the signatures of the internal gravity waves in the synthetic spectra to be consistent with observations of the real Sun. The effect of magnetic field on the wave spectra is not as clearly discernible in synthetic observations as in the case of numerical simulations. The phase differences obtained using the spectral lines are significantly different from the phase differences in the simulation. The phase coherency between two atmospheric layers in the gravity wave regime is height dependent and is seen to decrease with the travel distance between the observed layers. In the studied models, the lower atmosphere shows a phase coherency above the significance level for a height separation of ∼400 km, while in the chromospheric layers it reduces to ∼100–200 km depending on the average magnetic flux density. Conclusion. We conclude that the energy flux of IGWs determined from the phase difference analysis may be overestimated by an order of magnitude. Spectral lines that are weak and less temperature sensitive may be better suited to detecting internal waves and accurately determining their energy flux in the solar atmosphere.


Author(s):  
G. Vigeesh ◽  
M. Roth ◽  
O. Steiner ◽  
B. Fleck

The solar surface is a continuous source of internal gravity waves (IGWs). IGWs are believed to supply the bulk of the wave energy for the lower solar atmosphere, but their existence and role for the energy balance of the upper layers is still unclear, largely due to the lack of knowledge about the influence of the Sun’s magnetic fields on their propagation. In this work, we look at naturally excited IGWs in realistic models of the solar atmosphere and study the effect of different magnetic field topographies on their propagation. We carry out radiation-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of a magnetic field free and two magnetic models—one with an initial, homogeneous, vertical field of 100 G magnetic flux density and one with an initial horizontal field of 100 G flux density. The propagation properties of IGWs are studied by examining the phase-difference and coherence spectra in the k h  −  ω diagnostic diagram. We find that IGWs in the upper solar atmosphere show upward propagation in the model with predominantly horizontal field similar to the model without magnetic field. In contrast to that the model with predominantly vertical fields show downward propagation. This crucial difference in the propagation direction is also revealed in the difference in energy transported by waves for heights below 0.8 Mm. Higher up, the propagation properties show a peculiar behaviour, which require further study. Our analysis suggests that IGWs may play a significant role in the heating of the chromospheric layers of the internetwork region where horizontal fields are thought to be prevalent. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘High-resolution wave dynamics in the lower solar atmosphere’.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
H. C. Wu ◽  
D. J. Hsieh ◽  
T. W. Yen ◽  
P. J. Sun ◽  
D. Chandrasekhar Kakarla ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 151 (24) ◽  
pp. 244308 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Mims ◽  
Alexander Schmiedel ◽  
Marco Holzapfel ◽  
Nikita N. Lukzen ◽  
Christoph Lambert ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 294-295 ◽  
pp. 709-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Kitazawa ◽  
Yasuhiro Ikezoe ◽  
Hiromichi Uetake ◽  
Noriyuki Hirota

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document