Wind Response Control of 76-Storey Benchmark Building with Distributed Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers

Author(s):  
Said Elias ◽  
Vasant Matsagar
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Elias ◽  
R. Rupakhety ◽  
S. Olafsson

This study presents analysis of a benchmark building installed with tuned mass dampers (TMDs) while subjected to wind and earthquake loads. Different TMD schemes are applied to reduce dynamic responses of the building under wind and earthquakes. The coupled equations of motion are formulated and solved using numerical methods. The uncontrolled building (NC) and the controlled building are subjected to a set of 100 earthquake ground motions and wind forces. The effectiveness of using different multiple TMD (MTMD) schemes as opposed to single TMD (STMD) is presented. Optimal TMD parameters and their location are investigated. For a tall structure like the one studied here, TMDs are found to be more effective in controlling acceleration response than displacement, when subjected to wind forces. It is observed that MTMDs with equal stiffness in each of the TMDs (usually considered for wind response control), when optimized for a given structure, are effective in controlling acceleration response under both wind and earthquake forces. However, if the device is designed with equal mass in every floor, it is less effective in controlling wind-induced floor acceleration. Therefore, when it comes to multihazard response control, distributed TMDs with equal stiffnesses should be preferred over those with equal masses.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Said Elias ◽  
Vasant Matsagar

Multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMDs) distributed along height of a high-rise building are investigated for their effectiveness in vibration response control. A 76-storey benchmark building is modeled as shear type structure with a lateral degree of freedom at each floor, and tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are installed at top/different floors. Suitable locations for installing the TMDs and their tuning frequencies are identified based, respectively, on the mode shapes and frequencies of the uncontrolled and controlled buildings. Multimode control strategy has been adopted, wherein each TMD is placed where the mode shape amplitude of the building is the largest or large in the particular mode being controlled and tuned with the corresponding modal frequency. Newmark’s method is used to solve the governing equations of motion for the structure. The performance of the distributed MTMDs (d-MTMDs) is compared with single tuned mass damper (STMD) and all the MTMDs placed at top floor. The variations of top floor acceleration and displacement under wind loads are computed to study the effectiveness of the MTMDs in vibration control of the high-rise building. It is concluded that the d-MTMDs are more effective to control wind induced vibration than the STMD and the MTMDs placed at top floor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (06) ◽  
pp. 1950059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Said Elias ◽  
Vasant Matsagar ◽  
T. K. Datta

Dynamic response control of a wind-excited tall building installed with distributed multiple tuned mass dampers (d-MTMDs) is presented. The performance of d-MTMDs is compared with those of single tuned mass damper (STMD) and MTMDs installed at top of the building. The modal frequencies and mode shapes of the building are first determined. Based on the mode shapes of the uncontrolled and controlled building, the most suitable locations are identified for the dampers, in that the TMDs are placed where the modal amplitude of the building is the largest/larger in a particular mode, with each tuned to the modal frequency of the first five modes. The coupled differential equations of motion for the system are derived for the cases with the STMD, MTMDs, and d-MTMDs and solved numerically. Extensive parametric studies are conducted to compare the effectiveness of the three control schemes using STMD, MTMDs, and d-MTMDs by examining the variations in wind-induced responses. The mass ratios, damping ratios of the devices, number of TMDs, and robustness of the TMDs are the parameters of investigation. It is concluded that the MTMDs exhibit improved performance when compared with the STMD. The use of d-MTMDs is most efficient among the three schemes because it can effectively control wind-induced response of the building, while reduced space is required in the installation of the TMDs, as they are placed at various floors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document