scholarly journals Antiretroviral therapy does not affect response to chronic hepatitis C therapy in HIV-coinfected patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (07) ◽  
pp. 762-769
Author(s):  
Luciana Brosina De Leon ◽  
Cristiane Valle Tovo ◽  
Dimas Alexandre Kliemann ◽  
Angelo Alves De Mattos ◽  
Alberi Adolfo Feltrin ◽  
...  

Introduction: Many patients coinfected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are using highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and HCV therapy with peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirina (RBV) because the use of direct-acting antivirals is not a reality in some countries. To know the impact of such medications in the sustained virological response (SVR) during HCV treatment is of great importance. Methodology: This was a retrospective cohort study of 215 coinfected HIV/HCV patients. The patients were treated with PEG-IFN and RBV between 2007 and 2013 and analyzed by intention to treat. Treatment-experienced patients to HCV and carriers of hepatitis B were excluded. Demographic data (gender, age), mode of infection, HCV genotype, HCV viral load, hepatic fibrosis, HIV status, and type of PEG were evaluated. One hundred eighty-eight (87.4%) patients were using HAART. Results: SVR was achieved in 55 (29.3%) patients using HAART and in 9 (33.3%) patients not using HAART (p = 0.86). There was no difference in SVR between different HAART medications and regimens using two reverse transcriptase inhibitor nucleosides (NRTIs) or the use of protease inhibitors and non-NRTIs (27.1% versus 31.5%; p = 0.61). The predictive factors for obtaining SVR were low HCV viral load, non-1 genotype, and the use of peginterferon-α2a. Conclusions: The use of HAART does not influence the SVR of HCV under PEG-IFN and RBV therapy in HIV/HCV coinfected patients.

AIDS ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 2129-2136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Miller ◽  
Caroline A. Sabin ◽  
Andrew N. Phillips ◽  
Carsten Rottmann ◽  
Holger Rabenau ◽  
...  

AIDS ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (16) ◽  
pp. 1843-1847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Palmisano ◽  
Marina Giuliano ◽  
Emanuele Nicastri ◽  
Maria Franca Pirillo ◽  
Mauro Andreotti ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1248-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Chaillon ◽  
Stéphane Le Vu ◽  
Sylvie Brunet ◽  
Guillaume Gras ◽  
Frédéric Bastides ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe aim of this study was to estimate the rate of misclassification in treated HIV patients who initiated treatment at the chronic stage of HIV infection using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) that discriminates between recent infection (RI; within 6 months) and established infection. The performance of EIA-RI was evaluated in 96 HIV-1 chronically infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with an undetectable viral load (VL) for at least 3 years. Demographic data, HIV-1 viral load, CD4+T-cell count, viral subtype, and treatment duration were collected. The subset of misclassified patients was further analyzed using samples collected annually. The impact on incidence estimates was evaluated by simulation. The specificity in treated patients was significantly lower (70.8 to 77.1%) than that observed in untreated patients (93.3 to 99.3%,P< 0.001). Patients falsely classified as recently infected had been treated for a longer period and had longer-term viral suppression than those correctly classified. The loss of specificity of the test due to treatment may have a dramatic impact on the accuracy of the incidence estimates, with a major impact when HIV prevalence is high. The cross-sectional studies intended to derive HIV incidence must collect information on treatment or, alternatively, should include detection of antiretroviral drugs in blood specimens to rule out treated patients from the calculations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document