Fluorescent dual colour 2D-protein gel electrophoresis for rapid detection of differences in protein pattern with standard image analysis software

Author(s):  
Ferdinand Von Eggeling ◽  
Alexander Gawriljuk ◽  
Wolfgang Fiedler ◽  
Gunther Ernst ◽  
Uwe Claussen ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franka Kahlenberg ◽  
Ulrich Sack ◽  
Andreas Boldt

AbstractImage analysis of 1D gel electrophoresis can be performed by numerous types of software. The results are used, e.g., to create reference data or for association with diseases. In this study, we analyzed statistical differences between two types of established image analysis software. The aim was to inform customers that different types of software may produce various results which may lead to different data interpretations.Automated serum protein electrophoresis (albumin, α1-globulin, α2-globulin, β-globulin and γ-globulin) was performed with sera from 25 patients (randomized). Gel bands were quantitatively analyzed by TotalLab 120 (TL120), LabImage 1D (L340) and Phoresis (reference standard). Finally, the degree of deviation (vs. reference standard) of obtained data was investigated by statistical methods (Bland-Altman, Passing-Bablok, reliability).Passing-Bablok analysis: in L340 and TL120 linearity of test data vs. reference data was passed (p<0.01; L340: y=0.00+1.00x vs. TL120: y=–0.01+1.02x). Bland-Altman analysis: L340 exhibited a lower deviation and standard deviation to reference (mean: –1.5%; SD: 23.0% to –25.9%) vs. TL120 (mean: –8.2%; SD: 32.6% to –48.6%). Reliability: L340 (k=0.404; 95% CI=0.315–0.493) vs. TL120 (k=0.105; 95% CI=0.105–0.245). Detailed serum protein analysis revealed that most data (except α1-globulin) obtained by L340 were within 5% tolerance range, in contrast to data from TL120 (mean%±SEM%: albumin: 0.68±0.49 vs. 6.26±1.44; α1-globulin: –10.80±3.02 vs. –33.72±4.78; α2-globulin: –2.19±1.75 vs. –16.51±2.13; β-globulin: 0.99±1.67 vs. –9.84±2.78; γ-globulin: –1.44±1.73 vs. 5.00±5.67).In this study, it was shown that 1D electrophoresis data varied in a wide range depending on the type of image software. Awareness of these facts and sensible choice of 1D electrophoresis image software may help avoid incorrect data analysis.


Plant Methods ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Zhou ◽  
Xiujuan Chai ◽  
Zixuan Yang ◽  
Hongwu Wang ◽  
Chenxue Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important food sources in the world and has been one of the main targets of plant genetics and phenotypic research for centuries. Observation and analysis of various morphological phenotypic traits during maize growth are essential for genetic and breeding study. The generally huge number of samples produce an enormous amount of high-resolution image data. While high throughput plant phenotyping platforms are increasingly used in maize breeding trials, there is a reasonable need for software tools that can automatically identify visual phenotypic features of maize plants and implement batch processing on image datasets. Results On the boundary between computer vision and plant science, we utilize advanced deep learning methods based on convolutional neural networks to empower the workflow of maize phenotyping analysis. This paper presents Maize-IAS (Maize Image Analysis Software), an integrated application supporting one-click analysis of maize phenotype, embedding multiple functions: (I) Projection, (II) Color Analysis, (III) Internode length, (IV) Height, (V) Stem Diameter and (VI) Leaves Counting. Taking the RGB image of maize as input, the software provides a user-friendly graphical interaction interface and rapid calculation of multiple important phenotypic characteristics, including leaf sheath points detection and leaves segmentation. In function Leaves Counting, the mean and standard deviation of difference between prediction and ground truth are 1.60 and 1.625. Conclusion The Maize-IAS is easy-to-use and demands neither professional knowledge of computer vision nor deep learning. All functions for batch processing are incorporated, enabling automated and labor-reduced tasks of recording, measurement and quantitative analysis of maize growth traits on a large dataset. We prove the efficiency and potential capability of our techniques and software to image-based plant research, which also demonstrates the feasibility and capability of AI technology implemented in agriculture and plant science.


1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl n. Roth ◽  
Knut Wenzelides ◽  
Guenter Wolf ◽  
Peter Hufnagl

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 2060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serkan Ozkaya ◽  
Wojciech Neja ◽  
Sylwia Krezel-Czopek ◽  
Adam Oler

The objective of this study was to predict bodyweight and estimate body measurements of Limousin cattle using digital image analysis (DIA). Body measurements including body length, wither height, chest depth, and hip height of cattle were determined both manually (by measurements stick) and by using DIA. Body area was determined by using DIA. The images of Limousin cattle were taken while cattle were standing in a squeeze chute by a digital camera and analysed by image analysis software to obtain body measurements of each animal. While comparing the actual and predicted body measurements, the accuracy was determined as 98% for wither height, 97% for hip height, 94% for chest depth and 90.6% for body length. Regression analysis between body area and bodyweight yielded an equation with R2 of 61.5%. The regression equation, which included all body traits, resulted in an R2 value of 88.7%. The results indicated that DIA can be used for accurate prediction of body measurements and bodyweight of Limousin cattle.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangchang Feng ◽  
Pengzhao Zhang ◽  
Wenhao Shen ◽  
Pengbo Liu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document