scholarly journals Analyzing multiple stressor effects on EPT taxa in a mesocosm experiment with DNA metabarcoding

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Thérése Werner ◽  
Arne Beermann ◽  
Vasco Elbrecht ◽  
Vera Zizka ◽  
Florian Leese

Multiple stressors diversely and often adversely affect stream ecosystems around the globe. Therefore, understanding multiple stressor effects on different organisms is essential for a better ecosystem understanding, an accurate water quality assessment and improved ecosystem management. However, while multiple stressor effects should be assessed at species level this taxonomic resolution is often not achieved e.g. for stream macroinvertebrates. Due to their high abundance and diversity, species-level identification is often not feasible with morphology‑based approaches. DNA metabarcoding represents an alternative approach for studying multiple stressor interactions at species level. In an outdoor experiment over 10,000 specimens from the insect orders Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT), which are routinely used as bioindicators, and their responses to stressors were studied. In the experiment salinity, fine sediment deposition and flow velocity were manipulated in a full‑factorial design in 64 mesocosms with two microhabitats each (streambed and leaf litter), resulting in eight replicates per treatment. DNA metabarcoding revealed 122 EPT Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs), from which the most abundant 27 alone showed 14 different response patterns to the applied stressors. The high taxonomic resolution achieved by DNA metabarcoding revealed species specific stressor responses that were hidden at a lower taxonomic resolution. As a prominent example, Rhithrogena semicolorata responded negatively to fine sediment deposition and flow velocity reduction, while Ecdyonurus torrentis (both Heptageniidae, Ephemeroptera) was insensitive to experimental manipulation, highlighting different stressor responses among species within the same family (Fig. 1, Beermann et al. 2020). Even for well-studied organisms such as EPT taxa, this study shows that DNA metabarcoding has the potential to depict response patterns at species or OTU level despite high specimen abundance. Consequently, DNA metabarcoding promises to be a rewarding method when investigating and assessing multiple stressor effects on stream water quality.

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasco Elbrecht ◽  
Pierre Taberlet ◽  
Tony Dejean ◽  
Alice Valentini ◽  
Philippe Usseglio-Polatera ◽  
...  

Cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) is a powerful marker for DNA barcoding of animals, with good taxonomic resolution and a large reference database. However, when used for DNA metabarcoding, estimation of taxa abundances and species detection are limited due to primer bias caused by highly variable primer binding sites across the COI gene. Therefore, we explored the ability of the 16S ribosomal DNA gene as an alternative metabarcoding marker for species level assessments. Ten bulk samples, each containing equal amounts of tissue from 52 freshwater invertebrate taxa, were sequenced with the Illumina NextSeq 500 system. The 16S primers amplified three more insect species than the Folmer COI primers and amplified more equally, probably due to decreased primer bias. Estimation of biomass might be less biased with 16S than with COI, although variation in read abundances of two orders of magnitudes is still observed. According to these results, the marker choice depends on the scientific question. If the goal is to obtain a taxonomic identification at the species level, then COI is more appropriate due to established reference databases and known taxonomic resolution of this marker, knowing that a greater proportion of insects will be missed using COI Folmer primers. If the goal is to obtain a more comprehensive survey the 16S marker, which requires building a local reference database, or optimised degenerated COI primers could be more appropriate.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasco Elbrecht ◽  
Pierre Taberlet ◽  
Tony Dejean ◽  
Alice Valentini ◽  
Philippe Usseglio-polatera ◽  
...  

Cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) is a powerful marker for DNA barcoding of animals, with good taxonomic resolution and a large reference database. However, when used for DNA metabarcoding, estimation of taxa abundances and species detection are limited due to primer bias caused by highly variable primer binding sites across the COI gene. Therefore, we explored the ability of the 16S ribosomal DNA gene as an alternative metabarcoding marker for species level assessments. Ten bulk samples, each containing equal amounts of tissue from 52 freshwater invertebrate taxa, were sequenced with the Illumina NextSeq 500 system. In comparison to COI, the 16S marker amplified more insect species and amplified more equally, probably due to decreased primer bias. Rough estimation of biomass might thus be less biased with 16S than with COI. According to these results, the marker choice depends on the scientific question. If the goal is to obtain a taxonomic identification at the species level, then COI is more appropriate due to established reference databases and known taxonomic resolution of this marker, knowing that a greater proportion of species will be missed using COI Folmer primers. If the goal is to obtain a more comprehensive survey in a context where it is possible to build a local reference database, the 16S marker could be more appropriate.


2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasco Elbrecht ◽  
Arne J. Beermann ◽  
Gunnar Goessler ◽  
Janis Neumann ◽  
Ralph Tollrian ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasco Elbrecht ◽  
Pierre Taberlet ◽  
Tony Dejean ◽  
Alice Valentini ◽  
Philippe Usseglio-polatera ◽  
...  

Cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) is a powerful marker for DNA barcoding of animals, with good taxonomic resolution and a large reference database. However, when used for DNA metabarcoding, estimation of taxa abundances and species detection are limited due to primer bias caused by highly variable primer binding sites across the COI gene. Therefore, we explored the ability of the 16S ribosomal DNA gene as an alternative metabarcoding marker for species level assessments. Ten bulk samples, each containing equal amounts of tissue from 52 freshwater invertebrate taxa, were sequenced with the Illumina NextSeq 500 system. In comparison to COI, the 16S marker amplified more insect species and amplified more equally, probably due to decreased primer bias. Rough estimation of biomass might thus be less biased with 16S than with COI. According to these results, the marker choice depends on the scientific question. If the goal is to obtain a taxonomic identification at the species level, then COI is more appropriate due to established reference databases and known taxonomic resolution of this marker, knowing that a greater proportion of species will be missed using COI Folmer primers. If the goal is to obtain a more comprehensive survey in a context where it is possible to build a local reference database, the 16S marker could be more appropriate.


2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 2151-2160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markku J. Lehtola ◽  
Michaela Laxander ◽  
Ilkka T. Miettinen ◽  
Arja Hirvonen ◽  
Terttu Vartiainen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Atienza Casas ◽  
Markus Majaneva ◽  
Thomas Jensen ◽  
Marie Davey ◽  
Frode Fossøy ◽  
...  

Biodiversity assessments using molecular identification of organisms through high-throughput sequencing techniques have been a game changer in ecosystem monitoring, providing increased taxonomic resolution, more objective identifications, potential cost reductions, and reduced processing times. The use of DNA metabarcoding of bulk samples and environmental DNA (eDNA) is now widespread but is not yet universally implemented in national monitoring programs. While bulk sample metabarcoding involves extraction of DNA from organisms in a sample, eDNA analysis involves obtaining DNA directly from environmental samples, which can include microorganisms, meiofauna-size taxa and macrofauna traces such as larval stages, skin and hair cells, gametes, faeces and free DNA bound to particles. In Norway, freshwater biomonitoring in compliance with the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) is conducted on several administrative levels, including national monitoring programs for running water, small and large lakes. These programs typically focus on a fraction of the actual biodiversity present in the monitored habitats (Weigand 2019). DNA metabarcoding of both bulk samples and eDNA samples are relevant tools for future freshwater biomonitoring in Norway. The aim of this PhD project is to develop assessment protocols based on DNA-metabarcoding and eDNA of benthic invertebrates, microcrustaceans and fish that can be used as standard biomonitoring tools to assess the ecological condition of lakes. The main topics addressed will be: - Development of protocols throughout the eDNA-metabarcoding workflow (i.e. sampling, filtration, preservation, extraction, amplification and sequencing) suitable to execute biodiversity assessments and determine the ecological status of lakes. - Comparison of the results obtained using molecular tools and traditional morphology-based approaches in order to assess the feasibility of such techniques to be incorporated as standard biomonitoring tools, such as the ones implemented under the provisions of the WFD. - Evaluate the effect of improved taxonomic resolution from molecular techniques on determining the ecological status of lakes, both by broadening the number of taxa analyzed and by identifying more taxa to species level. - Assess the feasibility of using eDNA extracted from water samples, taken at different depths and fish densities, to measure fish abundance/biomass as a proxy to calculate the ecological quality indices regulated in the WFD. - Analyze the coverage and resolution provided by reference libraries for certain taxa, such as crustacea, in order to assess the reliability and precision of taxonomic assignments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document