Association ofIRF5Polymorphisms with Susceptibility to Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 769-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
MASAKATSU YANAGIMACHI ◽  
TAKUYA NARUTO ◽  
TAKAKO MIYAMAE ◽  
TAKUMA HARA ◽  
MASAKO KIKUCHI ◽  
...  

Objective.Systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (systemic JIA) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), the most devastating complication of systemic JIA, are characterized by abnormal levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) is a member of the IRF family of transcription factors, and acts as a master transcription factor in the activation of genes encoding proinflammatory cytokines. Polymorphisms in theIRF5gene have been associated with susceptibility to autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis. Our aim was to assess associations ofIRF5gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to systemic JIA and MAS.Methods.ThreeIRF5single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs729302, rs2004640, and rs2280714) were genotyped using TaqMan assays in 81 patients with systemic JIA (33 with MAS, 48 without) and 190 controls.Results.There were no associations of theIRF5gene polymorphisms or haplotypes under study with susceptibility to systemic JIA. There was a significant association of the rs2004640 T allele with MAS susceptibility (OR 4.11; 95% CI 1.84, 9.16; p = 0.001). TheIRF5haplotype (rs729302 A, rs2004640 T, and rs2280714 T), which was reported as conferring an increased risk of SLE, was significantly associated with MAS susceptibility in patients with systemic JIA (OR 4.61; 95% CI 1.73, 12.3; p < 0.001).Conclusion.IRF5gene polymorphism is a genetic factor influencing susceptibility to MAS in patients with systemic JIA, and IRF5 contributes to the pathogenesis of MAS in these patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omkar Phadke ◽  
Kelly Rouster-Stevens ◽  
Helen Giannopoulos ◽  
Shanmuganathan Chandrakasan ◽  
Sampath Prahalad

Abstract Background Subcutaneous anakinra is an interleukin-1 inhibitor used to treat juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Recent reports suggest anakinra can be a valuable addition to the treatment of COVID-19 associated cytokine storm syndrome and the related multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) in children. Herein, we describe our experience with intravenously administered anakinra. Findings 19 Patients (9 male) received intravenous (IV) anakinra for treatment of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic JIA (SJIA) or secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH). In most cases the general trend of the fibrinogen, ferritin, AST, and platelet count (Ravelli criteria) improved after initiation of IV anakinra. There were no reports of anaphylaxis or reactions associated with administration of IV anakinra. Conclusion Intravenous administration of anakinra is an important therapeutic option for critically ill patients with MAS/HLH. It is also beneficial for those with thrombocytopenia, subcutaneous edema, neurological dysfunction, or very young, hospitalized patients who need multiple painful subcutaneous injections.


2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Ravelli ◽  
Francesca Minoia ◽  
Sergio Davì ◽  
AnnaCarin Horne ◽  
Francesca Bovis ◽  
...  

To develop criteria for the classification of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). A multistep process, based on a combination of expert consensus and analysis of real patient data, was conducted. A panel of 28 experts was first asked to classify 428 patient profiles as having or not having MAS, based on clinical and laboratory features at the time of disease onset. The 428 profiles comprised 161 patients with systemic JIA—associated MAS and 267 patients with a condition that could potentially be confused with MAS (active systemic JIA without evidence of MAS, or systemic infection). Next, the ability of candidate criteria to classify individual patients as having MAS or not having MAS was assessed by evaluating the agreement between the classification yielded using the criteria and the consensus classification of the experts. The final criteria were selected in a consensus conference. Experts achieved consensus on the classification of 391 of the 428 patient profiles (91.4%). A total of 982 candidate criteria were tested statistically. The 37 best-performing criteria and 8 criteria obtained from the literature were evaluated at the consensus conference. During the conference, 82% consensus among experts was reached on the final MAS classification criteria. In validation analyses, these criteria had a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.99. Agreement between the classification (MAS or not MAS) obtained using the criteria and the original diagnosis made by the treating physician was high (κ=0.76). We have developed a set of classification criteria for MAS complicating systemic JIA and provided preliminary evidence of its validity. Use of these criteria will potentially improve understanding of MAS in systemic JIA and enhance efforts to discover effective therapies, by ensuring appropriate patient enrollment in studies.


2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 4135-4142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tellen D. Bennett ◽  
Mark Fluchel ◽  
Aimee O. Hersh ◽  
Kristen N. Hayward ◽  
Adam L. Hersh ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. 598-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Ravelli ◽  
Silvia Magni-Manzoni ◽  
Angela Pistorio ◽  
Cristina Besana ◽  
Tiziana Foti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document