Risk stratification of patients with gastric lesions indefinite for dysplasia

Background and aimsMutational load (ML) has been shown to help risk-stratify those that may progress from non-dysplastic Barrett’s oesophagus (BE) to dysplastic disease. Management of patients with BE and indefinite for dysplasia (BE-IND) is challenging and risk stratification tools are lacking. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the utility of ML for risk stratification in patients with BE-IND.MethodsThis is a single-centre, retrospective pilot study evaluating ML quantification in patients with BE-IND. Histology at follow-up endoscopy at least 1 year after the baseline endoscopy was used to determine if a patient progressed to low or high dysplasia. The ML levels were then compared among patients who progressed to dysplasia versus those who did not.ResultsThirty-five patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified, and seven met the exclusion criteria. Twenty-eight patients were analysed, of whom eight progressed to low-grade dysplasia (6) and high-grade dysplasia (2). Seven of these eight patients had some level of genomic instability detected in their IND biopsy (ML ≥0.5). Ten of the 20 (50%) who did not progress had no ML level. At an ML cut-off above 1.5, the risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia was 33% vs 0% (p=0.005), with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85%.ConclusionThese results indicate that ML may be able to risk-stratify progression to high-grade dysplasia in BE-IND. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Download Full-text

Novel Pathologic Factors for Risk Stratification of Gastric “Indefinite for Dysplasia” Lesions

Gastroenterology Research and Practice ◽

10.1155/2020/9460681 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-11

Author(s):

Kwangil Yim ◽

Jung Ha Shin ◽

Jinyoung Yoo ◽

Stephen Fink

Keyword(s):

Image Analysis ◽

Risk Stratification ◽

Endoscopic Resection ◽

Final Diagnosis ◽

Low Grade ◽

Test Set ◽

Indefinite For Dysplasia ◽

Validation Set ◽

Nuclear Polarity

Background/Aims. “Indefinite for dysplasia” (IND) conditions of the stomach have high malignancy rates (22.6%–75.0%). Endoscopic resection is sometimes used for follow-up, but criteria for selecting this follow-up method are not established. We investigated pathologic factors to subclassify the IND of the stomach and select appropriate follow-up methods. Methods. In total, 123 IND cases with final diagnoses of cancer (29.3%), high-grade dysplasia (6.5%), low-grade dysplasia (11.4%), and nonneoplasm (52.8%) were randomly divided into test set ( n = 27 ) and validation set ( n = 96 ). By the image analysis, size, pleomorphism, hyperchromasia, irregularity of nuclei, and ratios of structural atypia area (SAA) to total IND area were measured in the test set. Using the validation set, consensus meetings were held for the evaluation of pathologic factors that predict the final diagnosis. Results. By image analysis, the only ratio of SAA to total IND area was associated with the final diagnosis ( p < 0.001 ). In the consensus meeting for validation, the nuclear factors, except loss of nuclear polarity ( p = 0.004 – 0.026 ), could not predict the final diagnosis. Conversely, most structural factors could predict the final diagnosis. In particular, SAA > 25 % was the most powerful predictive factor. We proposed criteria of risk stratification by using SAA > 25 % , loss of surface maturation (LOSM), and loss of nuclear polarity (LONP) (Malignancy rate; Category 0: SAA ≤ 25 % without LOSM and LONP; 0%, Category 1: SAA ≤ 25 % with any of LOSM or LONP; 15.2%–16.7%, Category 2: SAA > 25 % without LOSM and LONP; 44.4%–50.0%, Category 3: SAA > 25 % with any of LOSM or LONP 54.5%–55.6%). Conclusions. Structural atypia was more helpful than nuclear atypia and SAA > 25 % was the most powerful predictor for the diagnosis of INDs of the stomach. We propose shortening the follow-up period to six months for Category 1, endoscopic resection for Category 2 and 3, postresection follow-up periods of one year for Category 2, and six months for Category 3.

Download Full-text