Le d�sir homosexuel comme facteur de mixit� sociale au travers des �crits de Christopher Isherwood, Stephen Spender, Daniel Gu�rin et Giorgio Bassani

Aden ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol N�14 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Patrick Dubuis
Author(s):  
Andrew Thacker

This innovative book examines the development of modernism in four European cities: London, Paris, Berlin, and Vienna. Focusing upon how literary and cultural outsiders represented various spaces in these cities, it draws upon contemporary theories of affect, mood, and literary geography to offer an original account of the geographical emotions of modernism. It considers three broad features of urban modernism: the built environment of the particular cities, such as cafés or transport systems; the cultural institutions of publishing that underpinned the development of modernism in these locations; and the complex perceptions of writers and artists who were outsiders to the four cities. Particular attention is thus given to the transnational qualities of modernism by examining figures whose view of the cities considered is that of migrants, exiles, or strangers. The writers and artists discussed include Mulk Raj Anand, Gwendolyn Bennett, Bryher, Blaise Cendrars, Joseph Conrad, T. S. Eliot, Christopher Isherwood, Hope Mirlees, Noami Mitchison, Jean Rhys, Sam Selon, and Stephen Spender.


2020 ◽  
pp. 129-173
Author(s):  
Ashley Maher

Though the cross-medium modern style advocated by Herbert Read and Stephen Spender aimed to bring good design to political as well as aesthetic structures, the Ministry of Information mobilized modernist rhetoric for propaganda during World War II. British authors such as Graham Greene and Dylan Thomas scripted films promoting the “new Britain” to be achieved through architecture-led revolution, yet the politicization of style and wartime fears of double agents meant that Elizabeth Bowen, George Orwell, and Christopher Isherwood turned the intense focus on style to their own work. Bowen used the “swastika arms of passage leading to nothing” of the mock-Tudor Holme Dene to scrutinize her memory-laden, late modernist writing, while Orwell and Isherwood directed their attention to streamlined glass and steel structures to contemplate the potential duplicity of their seemingly candid vernacular style.


1973 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-138
Author(s):  
Christopher Bone

In 1934, There appeared in the Saturday Review of Literature a poem entitled, “Audenspender.”A new double-enderIs Auden and Spender:Or, beggin' your pawdon,Is Spender and Auden.A team out of Oxon.,Like anti and toxin,But damned hard to renderIs Auden, is Spender.Their captains forsaken—Pound, Eliot, Aiken—They fire at us broad on,Do Spender and Auden.The gray-bearded trio,Remote now as LeoFor guts, glue and gender,Read Auden and Spender.Old seethings are seetherIn both or in either,When new strings are sawed onBy Spenderized Auden.There's treason, there's terror,Love, reason, and error:You'd toughen the tender,O Audenized Spender!In one or the otherIt's poetry, brother:The best bones are knawed onBy Spender, by Auden.Have you a rheumaticOld aunt in the attic?God save her, defend her,From Auden and SpenderIndeed, the two Oxford poets, W. H. Auden and Stephen Spender, became acknowledged leaders of a “movement” in English poetry in the 1930's. Other writers associated with the “movement” were Michael Roberts, John Lehmann, Rex Warner, Julian Symons, William Empson, William Plomer, Julian Bell, Charles Madge, Cecil Day Lewis, Louis MacNeice, Edward Upward, and Christopher Isherwood. The “movement,” whose members were variously appelled the “Thirties poets,” the “new poets,” the “Oxford Group,” and the “New Signatures poets,” was not an organized, formal movement and its so-called members did not consider themselves a “school” of poets and not all of them went to Oxford.


2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-322
Author(s):  
Mario Faraone

Throughout his life, Christopher Isherwood explored his sense of himself through a range of different genres of writing: autobiography, letters and journals, and fiction. The polysemic image of the mirror plays a major role in the structuring of his novels and other writings. Through the figure of the mirror, the writer signals many nearly imperceptible yet significant changes over time. This article explores this image in a range of Isherwood’s writings, and argues that, through its deployment, the artist very often questions himself about the dichotomy between appearance and reality. The presence of the mirror in the early writings assumes modalities which are distinct from those belonging to the conversion period to Vedanta, the Hindu-oriented philosophy and religion.


1998 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-128
Author(s):  
Sara S. Hodson

1984 ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
P. J. E. Hyams ◽  
H. Chr. Wekker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document