Bridge Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

Orthopedics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph T. Labrum ◽  
Asif M. Ilyas
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Bridge Plate

scholarly journals Carpal Translocation Following Dorsal Bridge Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: A Cadaveric Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. 234-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Azad ◽  
Jessica M. Intravia ◽  
J. Ryan Hill ◽  
Hyuma Leland ◽  
Venus Vakhshori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Ulnar Variance ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Approach ◽  
Radial Inclination ◽  
Bridge Plate ◽  
Radiocarpal Joint ◽  
Distal Fixation

Background Dorsal bridge plate fixation is an effective technique for stabilization of highly comminuted, complex distal radius fractures. However, it is unknown whether fixation to the second or third metacarpal is optimal. Given dorsal bridge plating spans the radiocarpal joint, it is unclear if the dorsal spanning plate affects carpal position. This study investigates differences in carpal translocation resulting from bridge plate distal fixation to either the second or third metacarpal. Methods Ten paired cadaveric upper extremities without evidence of gross deformity or prior surgery distal to the elbow were evaluated with three-view wrist fluoroscopic images for baseline radiographic measurements. An unstable distal radius fracture model was created via a volar approach using a 1-cm osteotomy. Following fracture creation, a dorsal bridge plate was applied with random to the second metacarpal on one limb, and the third metacarpal on the contralateral limb. Laterality for distal fixation was chosen randomly. Fluoroscopic images were repeated and radial inclination, radial height, radiocarpal angle, volar tilt, ulnar variance, radiolunate angle, radioscaphoid angle, radial rotation index, and carpal translocation were measured. Results Radial inclination, radial height, radiocarpal angle, volar tilt, ulnar variance, radiolunate angle, and radioscaphoid angle were not statistically different before and after fixation, or when comparing the second or third metacarpal fixation. Additionally, there was no difference in Taleisnik's ulnar translocation index, Chamay's ulnar translation index, or McMurtry's carpal translation index based on which metacarpal was used for distal fixation. Conclusions Dorsal bridge plate fixation of distal radius fractures restores preoperative physiologic measures of the radius, ulna, and carpus. Carpal translocation was similar when comparing distal fixation to the second or third metacarpal in distal radius fractures stabilized with a bridge plate. Level of Evidence This is a Level V, therapeutic study.

Functional Outcomes Following Bridge Plate Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1554-1562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Lauder ◽  
Sonya Agnew ◽  
Karim Bakri ◽  
Christopher H. Allan ◽  
Douglas P. Hanel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Bridge Plate

scholarly journals Minimising the risk of extensor pollicis longus rupture following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a cadaveric study

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
DC Perry ◽  
DMG Machin ◽  
JA Casaletto ◽  
DJ Brown
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Tendon Injury ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Extensor Pollicis Longus ◽  
Fixed Angle ◽  
Volar Plate Fixation

INTRODUCTION Rupture of extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon is a recognised complication following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures, usually from attrition caused by prominent screws. We sought to identify the screw holes in some of the most commonly used plates which may precipitate tendon injury. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Three fixed-angle volar locking plates were sequentially positioned into 18 cadaveric arms. A wire was passed through each of the holes in the plates using a locking guide and the dorsal relationships noted. RESULTS Each plate had specific ‘high-risk’ holes which directed the wire towards the EPL groove. The central screw holes appeared mostly implicated in EPL injury. CONCLUSIONS Awareness of ‘high-risk’ holes and appropriate minor alterations in surgical technique may consequently decrease the incidence of EPL irritation and rupture.

Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

Hand Clinics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-266
Author(s):  
Lili E. Schindelar ◽  
Asif M. Ilyas
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures

145 Outcomes of Unstable Distal Radius Fractures – A Meta-Analysis of Bridging External Fixation Versus Volar Plating

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Mulrain ◽  
K Joshi ◽  
F Doyle ◽  
A Abdulkarim
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Volar Plating ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Introduction Distal radius fractures are common and trends for fixation have changed with increased use of volar locking plates in recent time. A meta-analysis will summarise the best evidence for treatment. Method A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology to identify studies that reported clinical and/or radiological outcomes in patients with AO type C distal radius fractures when treated with external fixation versus ORIF. Results 10 randomised trials were included in this review, reporting on 967 patients. Clinical outcomes are in favour of volar plating at 3 months post-operation, but no difference between the two groups is seen at 6 or 12 months. Analysis of complication rates shows a minute increase in risk-ratio for volar plating versus external fixation. Subgroup analysis showed significantly higher re-operations after plate fixation and significantly higher infection after external fixation. Conclusions Internal fixation of complex distal radius fractures confers an improved clinical outcome at early follow up only and a minimally increased risk of complications. The improved grip strength with volar plating is only superior at early follow up and no long-term superiority is seen with either intervention. The type of surgery in this injury type therefore remains at the surgeon’s consideration on a case-by-case basis.

scholarly journals Volar Plate Fixation with AO Distal Radius Plate (DRP) for Distal Radius Fractures

2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-616
Author(s):  
Kazunobu Arakaki ◽  
Hikaru Tashima ◽  
Yosuke Asahara ◽  
Chikara Deguchi ◽  
Futoshi Kuga
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate Fixation

Utility and Cost Analysis of Radiographs Taken 2 Weeks Following Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1106-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Stone ◽  
Lisa M. Vaccaro ◽  
R. Colin Brabender ◽  
Alfred V. Hess
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures

scholarly journals Immobilization following Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (05) ◽  
pp. 409-414
Author(s):  
J. Hill ◽  
Gabriel Bouz ◽  
Ali Azad ◽  
William Pannell ◽  
R. Alluri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate Fixation

Background No consensus exists regarding postoperative splinting position following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether immobilization in supination would result in superior outcomes compared with no restriction of forearm range of motion. Patients and Methods All patients >18 years of age with distal radius fractures indicated for volar plate fixation were eligible. Exclusion criteria were open fracture and concomitant injury to, or functional deficit of, either upper extremity. Patients were randomized to immobilization in (1) maximal supination with a sugar-tong splint or (2) no restriction of supination with a volar splint. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score; wrist range of motion; and grip strength were recorded at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. A Student's t-test was used to compare mean values of all outcome measures at each time point. Results A total of 46 patients enrolled in the study; 28 were immobilized with a volar splint and 18 were immobilized with a sugar-tong splint. Six-week follow-up data were obtained for 32 patients. There was no significant difference in PRWE, DASH, and VAS scores; or range of motion; or grip strength between the two groups postoperatively. Conclusion Range of motion, grip strength, and patient-rated outcome measures were similar regardless of postoperative immobilization technique in patients with a distal radius fractures stabilized with a volar plate. Surgeons can elect to use the standard-of-care postoperative immobilization modality of their preference following volar plate fixation without compromising short-term return to function. Level of Evidence This is a Level II, therapeutic study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document