Psychiatric Patients' Perceptions of Their Milieu Therapy Program

1978 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
Linda J Sweeney
Psychotherapy ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Foreyt ◽  
Gary S. Felton

1971 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Lewis ◽  
P. R. Beck ◽  
Hinda King ◽  
Lyn Stephen

Milieu therapy is an increasingly popular approach to the treatment of psychiatric patients and a model of general application. It places emphasis on social and group interaction, on the sharing of responsibility and decision-making, on the freeing of communication on both vertical and horizontal planes and on dealing with the realities of the here-and-now. Its introduction has been accompanied by considerable enthusiasm and a sense of ‘rightness’ which parallel the existence of comparable movements in society as a whole. Partly because of this fervour, and mainly because of the methodological problems involved, intensive scientific evaluation of this mode of therapy has been difficult, though necessary. This paper describes the beginnings of a number of ongoing multidisciplinary studies, conducted on six wards in three institutions - the purpose being to provide a definition of milieu therapy, to describe its methods and objectives and to establish means of evaluation. The broad areas of the research project are: a statistical review of patients discharged before and following the adoption of milieu therapy; an in-depth analysis of the structure and functions of each of the units in the research setting; and a comparative study of the process and thera. peutic results of the six wards including two wards of other collaborating hospitals. Several constituent pilot projects have been reviewed. The advantages of an ongoing inhospital research consortium are discussed, and it is suggested that every sizeable unit should have one in the interests of the assessment of service. All that may be required is the mobilization of already existing personnel and volunteers, summer students and petty funds.


1975 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denton C. Buchanan

A short-term, open membership group therapy program for kidney transplant patients and their families is described. The content and process of this group is related to the ten curative factors described by Yalom for psychiatric patients. The primary benefits for the patients seemed to be the opportunity to observe others cope with similar problems and to learn of the adaptive strategies used by others. The patients were able to offer advice to others, to overcome their tendency toward seclusion and in general, experience a feeling of hope for the future. The family members gained more from a sense of group cohesiveness than did the patients. Both family and patients utilized the meetings to ventilate their anger and frustrations associated with chronic illness and to learn more about transplantation. A more realistic expectation of the future was provided. The group did not seem long enough to measurably improve the interpersonal relations between patients and their families nor did the group members comment upon maladaptive behaviors exhibited between family members within the meetings.


1977 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 311-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.T. Barker ◽  
M.F. Buck

Over a five-year period, thirty patients in a maximum security mental hospital were treated with LSD (500 mcmg. I.M.). Three different styles of interviewing procedure evolved with experience: a medical model, a “responsible street model”, and a non-directive model. The interviewer's orientation appeared to significantly affect the patient's perception of the LSD experience. Since it was felt by the authors that no one set of biased inputs has any demonstrable merit over any other, (except in satisfying the interviewer), the non-directive model was deemed most reasonable. Although all patients reported that the experience was of great benefit, no one else could see changes for better — or worse. Chromosomal studies showed the usual increased frequency of breaks. It is noted that cytogenetic experts do not now see this finding as a contraindication to the use of the drug. It was not thought that the LSD administration in hospital was a significant factor leading to use of street drugs after release. The only difference on administration to psychopaths and schizophrenics was that one-third of the psychopaths (6 of 18) acted out by punching or kicking at someone nearby. When used with the safeguards described, the drug seemed safe and valuable to use in our communities of long-stay patients, because of the high morale engendered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document