scholarly journals Starless bias and parameter-estimation bias in the likelihood-based phylogenetic method

AIMS Genetics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 212-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuhua Xia ◽  
◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuhua Xia

ABSTRACTI analyzed various site pattern combinations in a 4-OTU case to identify sources of starless bias and parameter-estimation bias in likelihood-based phylogenetic methods, and reported three significant contributions. First, the likelihood method is odd in that it may not generate a star tree with sequences that are equidistant from each other. This behaviour, dubbed starless bias, happens in a 4-OTU tree when there is an excess (i.e., more than expected from a star tree and a substitution model) of conflicting phylogenetic signals supporting the three resolved topologies equally. Special site pattern combinations leading to rejection of a star tree, when sequences are equidistant from each other, were identified. Second, fitting gamma distribution to model rate heterogeneity over sites is strongly confounded with tree topology, especially in conjunction with the starless bias. I present examples to show dramatic differences in the estimated shape parameter α between a star tree and a resolved tree. There may be no rate heterogeneity over sites (with the estimated α > 10000) when a star tree is imposed, but α < 1 (suggesting strong rate heterogeneity over sites) when an (incorrect) resolved tree is imposed. Thus, the dependence of “rate heterogeneity” on tree topology implies that “rate heterogeneity” is not a sequence-specific feature, cautioning against interpreting a small α to mean that some sites are under strong purifying selection and others not. Thirdly, because there is no existing (and working) likelihood method for evaluating a star tree with continuous gamma-distributed rate, I have implemented the method for JC69 in a self-contained R script for a four-OTU tree (star or resolved), in addition to another R script assuming a constant rate over sites. These R scripts should be useful for teaching and exploring likelihood methods in phylogenetics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 2-18
Author(s):  
David A. Walker ◽  
Thomas J. Smith

The impact of sparse data conditions was examined among one or more predictor variables in logistic regression and assessed the effectiveness of the Firth (1993) procedure in reducing potential parameter estimation bias. Results indicated sparseness in binary predictors introduces bias that is substantial with small sample sizes, and the Firth procedure can effectively correct this bias.


Optimization ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 665-672
Author(s):  
H. Burke ◽  
C. Hennig ◽  
W H. Schmidt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document