scholarly journals Use of Predator-Deterrent Fences to Increase Attwater's Prairie-Chicken Nest Success

Author(s):  
Michael E Morrow ◽  
John E Toepfer

We retrospectively evaluated 20 y of using predator-deterrent fences to mitigate unusually high nest predation for the critically endangered Attwater's prairie-chicken Tympanuchus cupido attwateri at the Attwater Prairie Chicken National Wildlife Refuge. Fences were constructed of 0.9-m high, 0.32-0.64-cm mesh hardware cloth, with 15.2-m long sides, and were staked at the bottom to discourage predators from going under the fence. Fences were placed around nests at = 3.2 d of incubation. Eighty-two percent of fenced nests were successful versus 12% for unfenced nests. Daily survival rate (DSR) increased from 0.9159 for unfenced nests in 1997-2011 to 0.9916 for fenced nests during 2000-2019. Fencing did not increase abandonment or reduce the proportion of eggs that hatched in successful nests. After 2012, we reduced fence sides from 15.2 m to 7.6 m in length. Larger and smaller fences were equally effective with respect to DSR and proportion of nests that were abandoned. The median proportion of eggs that hatched from successful nests was 6% higher for larger fences versus smaller fences, but this difference was not statistically significant. Predator-deterrent fences substantially increased Attwater's prairie-chicken nesting success in this study, and may represent a viable management strategy for increasing nesting success for other populations of ground-nesting birds with high conservation value.

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Victoria Cantu ◽  
Bryan Halloran ◽  
Autumn J. Smith-Herron ◽  
Tamara J. Cook

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 586-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela J. Ferro ◽  
Michael E. Morrow ◽  
Joseph P. Flanagan ◽  
Brent Ortego ◽  
Rebecca E. Chester ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 111 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 283-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus J. Peterson ◽  
William E. Grant ◽  
Nova J. Silvy

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Hofmeister ◽  
Fiona Georgousi ◽  
Melissa Lund ◽  
Pamela J. Ferro ◽  
Joe Flanagan ◽  
...  

1963 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 712 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. W. Lehmann ◽  
R. G. Mauermann

The Auk ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 925-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel M. Budnik ◽  
Mark R. Ryan ◽  
Frank R. Thompson III

Abstract Numbers of Bell's Vireos (Vireo bellii) have declined throughout much of the breeding range in recent years, yet little information exists to determine factors that are causing these declines. We studied Bell's Vireos nesting in grassland-shrub habitats at two study areas in central Missouri to determine reproductive performance, survival, and population growth potential. Birds were color banded and observed during the breeding seasons of 1996, 1997, and 1998 to determine seasonal fecundity. We monitored 124 breeding pairs (127 pair years) and 213 nests. Density declined from 1.00 to 0.80 territories per 10 ha at the first site and increased from 1.11 to 1.33 at the second site during the study. Mean nesting success was 31 ± SE of 0.03% overall and ranged from 13 to 42% among years and study areas; 57% of the pairs fledged at least one young. Low annual production was a function of high rates of nest predation (41% of all nests observed, accounting for 44 to 78% of daily nest mortality annually) and nest parasitism by Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater; 29% of nests observed, 17 to 37% of daily nest mortality annually). Mean seasonal fecundity was 1.60 young fledged per pair per year (range 1.00 to 1.79). Annual survival of adults was 61 ± 0.04% and was higher than previously reported. We used our estimates of seasonal fecundity and annual survival of adults to determine the finite rate of increase (λ) for our study population. Our study areas seemingly comprised sink habitats (λ = 0.85). Thus, the vireos on our study areas likely were limited by low reproductive success. Population declines also may be caused by habitat loss, which highlights the need for investigation of historical and current rates of loss of grassland-shrub habitat.


Ecosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaria Torres‐Poché ◽  
Miguel A. Mora ◽  
Thomas W. Boutton ◽  
Michael E. Morrow

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document