Can anisotropy parameters derived by seismic velocity analysis improve PSDM image?

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray Gedaly ◽  
Qingbo Liao
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Anisotropy Parameters

scholarly journals The Use of Core & Log Anisotropy Parameters into Seismic Data Processing: A Case Study of Deep-Water Reservoir

2021 ◽  
Vol 873 (1) ◽  
pp. 012038
Author(s):  
Madaniya Oktariena ◽  
Wahyu Triyoso ◽  
Dona Sita Ambarsari ◽  
Sigit Sukmono ◽  
Erlangga Septama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Transverse Isotropy ◽  
Anisotropy Parameter ◽  
Water Reservoir ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Subsurface Imaging ◽  
Sonic Log ◽  
Anisotropy Parameters ◽  
Vertical Transverse Isotropy

Abstract The seismic far-offset data plays important role in seismic subsurface imaging and reservoir parameters derivation, however, it is often distorted by the hockey stick effect due to improper correction of the Vertical Transverse Isotropy (VTI) during the seismic velocity analysis. The anisotropy parameter η is needed to properly correct the VTI effect. The anisotropy parameters of ε and δ obtained from log and core measurements, can be used to estimate the η values, however, the upscaling effects due to the different frequencies of the wave sources used in the measurements must be carefully taken into account. The objective is to get better understanding on the proper uses of anisotropy parameters in the the velocity analysis of deepwater seismic gather data. To achieve the objective, the anisotropy parameters from ultrasonic core measurements and dipole sonic log were used to model the seismic CDP gathers. The upscaling effects is reflected by the big difference of measured anisotropy values, in which the core measurement value is about 40 times higher than the log measurement value. The CDP gathers modelling results show that, due to the upscaling effect, the log and core-based models show significant differences of far-offset amplitude and hockey sticks responses. The differences can be minimized by scaling-down the log anisotropy values to core anisotropy values by using equations established from core – log anisotropy values cross-plot. The study emphasizes the importances of integrating anisotropy parameters from core and log data to minimize the upscaling effect to get the best η for the VTI correction in seismic velocity analysis.

High-resolution seismic velocity analysis by sign-based weighted semblance

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-35
Author(s):  
M. Javad Khoshnavaz
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Resolution Enhancement ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Seismic Attenuation ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Amplitude Versus Offset ◽  
Amplitude Versus

Building an accurate velocity model plays a vital role in routine seismic imaging workflows. Normal-moveout-based seismic velocity analysis is a popular method to make the velocity models. However, traditional velocity analysis methodologies are not generally capable of handling amplitude variations across moveout curves, specifically polarity reversals caused by amplitude-versus-offset anomalies. I present a normal-moveout-based velocity analysis approach that circumvents this shortcoming by modifying the conventional semblance function to include polarity and amplitude correction terms computed using correlation coefficients of seismic traces in the velocity analysis scanning window with a reference trace. Thus, the proposed workflow is suitable for any class of amplitude-versus-offset effects. The approach is demonstrated to four synthetic data examples of different conditions and a field data consisting a common-midpoint gather. Lateral resolution enhancement using the proposed workflow is evaluated by comparison between the results from the workflow and the results obtained by the application of conventional semblance and three semblance-based velocity analysis algorithms developed to circumvent the challenges associated with amplitude variations across moveout curves, caused by seismic attenuation and class II amplitude-versus-offset anomalies. According to the obtained results, the proposed workflow is superior to all the presented workflows in handling such anomalies.

Seismic velocity analysis case study: Geostatistical contributions

1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Young ◽  
A. J. Davis ◽  
D. R. Palmore ◽  
D. H. Thorson
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis

CSEM-regularized seismic velocity inversion: A multiscale, hierarchical workflow for subsalt imaging

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. B241-B252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Colombo ◽  
Diego Rovetta ◽  
Ersan Turkoglu
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Velocity Fields ◽  
Coupling Mechanism ◽  
Correct Result ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Inversion ◽  
Velocity Models

Seismic imaging in salt geology is complicated by highly contrasted velocity fields and irregular salt geometries, which cause complex seismic wavefield scattering. Although the imaging challenges can be addressed by advanced imaging algorithms, a fundamental problem remains in the determination of robust velocity fields in high-noise conditions. Conventional migration velocity analysis is often ineffective, and even the most advanced methods for depth-domain velocity analysis, such as full-waveform inversion, require starting from a good initial estimate of the velocity model to converge to a correct result. Nonseismic methods, such as electromagnetics, can help guide the generation of robust velocity models to be used for further processing. Using the multiphysics data acquired in the deepwater section of the Red Sea, we apply a controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) resistivity-regularized seismic velocity inversion for enhancing the velocity model in a complex area dominated by nappe-style salt tectonics. The integration is achieved by a rigorous approach of multiscaled inversions looping over model dimensions (1D first, followed by 3D), variable offsets and increasing frequencies, data-driven and interpretation-supported approaches, leading to a hierarchical inversion guided by a parameter sensitivity analysis. The final step of the integration consists of the inversion of seismic traveltimes subject to CSEM model constraints in which a common-structure coupling mechanism is used. Minimization is performed over the seismic data residuals and cross-gradient objective functions without inverting for the resistivity model, which is used as a reference for the seismic inversion (hierarchical approach). Results are demonstrated through depth imaging in which the velocity model derived through CSEM-regularized hierarchical inversion outperforms the results of a seismic-only derived velocity model.

scholarly journals A braver approach to seismic velocity analysis in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand

2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 267-269
Author(s):  
Denise Humphris ◽  
Jonathan Ravens
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document