scholarly journals Overview of tuna fisheries, stock status and management framework in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean

2016 ◽  
pp. 19-48
Author(s):  
Valérie Allain ◽  
Graham Michael Pilling ◽  
Peter Gregory Williams ◽  
Shelton Harley ◽  
Simon Nicol ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Transform Aqorau

AbstractThe 2000 Convention for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPF Convention) establishes a Commission which will be responsible for setting catch limits and effort controls for the fishery. The Convention will require the Pacific Island States to impose some form of catch limits and this presents them with the opportunity to explore ways to enhance the fisheries regimes they manage. This paper explores the legal issues surrounding a possible rights-based regime, both as a collective approach by the Pacific Island States, and individually. The paper suggests possible legal approaches to the introduction of a rights-based fisheries management regime, drawing on ways in which they may structure their fisheries legislation, and on experiences from other regions. The paper concludes by examining the implications for the Pacific Island States of such an approach.


Marine Policy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 288-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Rashid Sumaila ◽  
Andrew Dyck ◽  
Adam Baske

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Leroy ◽  
Joe Scutt Phillips ◽  
Simon Nicol ◽  
Graham M. Pilling ◽  
Shelton Harley ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 477-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Morin

The tuna fishery of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean occurs for the greater part in waters under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of coastal States which qualify as small island developing States (sids); this fishery is managed by the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (wcpfc). On account of the majority they represent, the sids strive for the adoption of measures which would benefit them. This article discusses the effect of these measures which may give the impression that the delicate balance reached with the adoption of the losc between the rights of coastal States and other States is being upset; this can be regarded as a kind of ‘creeping jurisdiction’. Three issues are considered: the quasi-exemption of application of many rules by the sids, the issue of the application of the Convention in the various areas under national jurisdiction and the requirements for the exercise of navigational rights.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document