scholarly journals Comment (et pourquoi) parler de Révolution sous le Consulat : la Correspondance politique et confidentielle inédite de Louis XVI, par Helen Maria Williams

Author(s):  
Paolo Conte
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-66
Author(s):  
Christine Adams

The relationship of the French king and royal mistress, complementary but unequal, embodied the Gallic singularity; the royal mistress exercised a civilizing manner and the soft power of women on the king’s behalf. However, both her contemporaries and nineteenth- and early twentieth-century historians were uncomfortable with the mistress’s political power. Furthermore, paradoxical attitudes about French womanhood have led to analyses of her role that are often contradictory. Royal mistresses have simultaneously been celebrated for their civilizing effect in the realm of culture, chided for their frivolous expenditures on clothing and jewelry, and excoriated for their dangerous meddling in politics. Their increasing visibility in the political realm by the eighteenth century led many to blame Louis XV’s mistresses—along with Queen Marie-Antoinette, who exercised a similar influence over her husband, Louis XVI—for the degradation and eventual fall of the monarchy. This article reexamines the historiography of the royal mistress.


1985 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-228
Author(s):  
Corinne Pré
Keyword(s):  

1891 ◽  
Vol 4 (13) ◽  
pp. 86-88
Author(s):  
Théodore Reinach
Keyword(s):  

Revue du Nord ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 71 (282) ◽  
pp. 723-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Trénard
Keyword(s):  

1989 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-85
Author(s):  
Fabienne Cirio
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document