scholarly journals Beyond the Dichotomy between Natural and Knowledge Commons: Reflections on the IAD Framework from the Ubatuba Open Science Project

Author(s):  
Sarita Albagli ◽  
Anne Clinio ◽  
Henrique Parra ◽  
Felipe Fonseca
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Hachani

Our presentation aims to show an original facet of open science: a project from the Souths and for the Souths. In S.O.H.A (Science Ouverte Haiti Afrique), we use Souths in plural because we believe in a plurality of layers of development. Our project aims to showcase Souths' research in indigenous languages, in local settings and in subjects that are of interest to the indigenous people. We will present the different program and tutorials in the project to prove that an open science from the Souths and for the Souths is possible.  


2018 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 123 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
A. M. Price-Whelan ◽  
B. M. Sipőcz ◽  
H. M. Günther ◽  
P. L. Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Jekel ◽  
Susann Fiedler ◽  
Ramona Allstadt Torras ◽  
Dorothee Mischkowski ◽  
Angela Rachael Dorrough ◽  
...  

The Hagen Cumulative Science Project is a large-scale replication project based on students’ thesis work. In the project, we aim to (a) teach students to conduct the entire research process for conducting a replication according to open science standards and (b) contribute to cumulative science by increasing the number of direct replications. We describe the procedural steps of the project from choosing suitable replication studies to guiding students through the process of conducting a replication, and processing results in a meta-analysis. Based on the experience of more than 80 replications, we summarize how such a project can be implemented. We present practical solutions that have been shown to be successful as well as discuss typical obstacles and how they can be solved. We argue that replication projects are beneficial for all groups involved: Students benefit by being guided through a highly structured protocol and making actual contributions to science. Instructors benefit by using time resources effectively for cumulative science and fulfilling teaching obligations in a meaningful way. The scientific community benefits from the resulting greater number of replications and teaching state-of-the-art methodology. We encourage the use of student thesis-based replication projects for thesis work in academic bachelor and master curricula.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marsha A. Wilcox ◽  
Adam J. Savitz ◽  
Anjené M. Addington ◽  
Gary S. Gray ◽  
Eva C. Guinan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arul George Scaria ◽  
Shreyashi Ray

This draft report summarises the major findings and recommendations from the open science project conducted at the Centre for Innovation, IntellectualProperty and Competition (CIIPC), National Law University, Delhi. Please send us your comments/ suggestions to Email: [email protected];Twitter: @openscience_in.


Author(s):  
Sofie Meeus ◽  
Wouter Addink ◽  
Donat Agosti ◽  
Christos Arvanitidis ◽  
Mariya Dimitrova ◽  
...  

The BiCIKL Project is born from a vision that biodiversity data are most useful if they are viewed as a network of data that can be integrated and viewed from different starting points. BiCIKL’s goal is to realize that vision by linking biodiversity data infrastructures, particularly for literature, molecular sequences, specimens, nomenclature and analytics. BiCIKL is an Open Science project creating Open FAIR data and services for the whole research community. BiCIKL intends to inspire novel, innovative, research and build services that can produce new and valuable knowledge, necessary for the protection of biodiversity and of our environment. BiCIKL will develop methods and workflows to harvest, link and access data extracted from literature. Yet, as the project gets underway, we need to better understand the existing infrastructures, their limitations, the nature of the data they hold, the services they provide and particularly how they can interoperate. To do this we organised a week-long hackathon where small teams worked on a number of pilot projects (Table 1) that were chosen to test the existing linkages between infrastructures and to extract novel ones. We will present our experience of running a hackathon and our evaluation of how successfully it achieved its aims. We will also give examples of the projects we conducted and how successful they were. Finally we will give our preliminary evaluation of what we learned about the interoperability of infrastructures and what recommendations we can give to improve their interoperability, whether that is improvements to the data standards used, the means to access the data and analyse them, or even the physical bandwidth and computational restrictions that limit the potential for research.


Author(s):  
Juan David Reina-Rozo ◽  
Luis Fernando Medina-Cardona

Science and technology are changing. We have seen the emergence of open and citizen-based science practices in the context of facing pandemics, such as COVID-19, xenophobia, or inequality, among others. Open science is a movement that advocates the collective construction of knowledge. This perspective has shown its importance with the emergence of rapid response initiatives to the current situation at national and international levels. This article discusses the relevance of knowledge commons and transparent objects in the era of intellectual property. Solidarity technoscientific initiatives become a vehicle to pose free culture as a pillar of a human future based on mutual support. In that sense, universities, publishers, students, the scientific and engineering community, and even citizens are creating efforts around open science intending to share results, data, designs, specifications, and even resources despite new socio-political limits and precautions. We argue that a technoscientific movement based on solidarity, free and open culture, is key to permeate and transform the various layers of governments, research institutions, and citizens-led initiatives. To address this, several examples are exposed offering a brief critical appraisal in the context of open science, a concept still in the making.


2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 837-852
Author(s):  
Kai Nishikawa

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to survey how research data are governed at repositories in Japan by deductively establishing a governance typology based on the concept of openness in the context of knowledge commons and empirically assessing the conformity of repositories to each type.Design/methodology/approachThe fuzzy-set ideal type analysis (FSITA) was adopted. For data collection, a manual assessment was conducted with all Japanese research data repositories registered on re3data.org.FindingsThe typology constructed in this paper consists of three dimensions: openness to resources (here equal to research data), openness to a community and openness to infrastructure provision. This paper found that there is no case where all dimensions are open, and there are several cases where the resources are closed despite research data repositories being positioned as a basis for open science in Japanese science and technology policy.Originality/valueThis is likely the first construction of the typology and application of FSITA to the study of research data governance based on knowledge commons. The findings of this paper provide practitioners insight into how to govern research data at repositories. The typology serves as a first step for future research on knowledge commons, for example, as a criterion of case selection in conducting in-depth case studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document