Inhibitory Effects of Brown Algae Extracts on Histamine Production in Mackerel Muscle via Inhibition of Growth and Histidine Decarboxylase Activity of Morganella morganii

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Hyun Kim ◽  
Koth Bong Woo Ri Kim ◽  
Ji Young Cho ◽  
Dong Hyun Ahn
Keyword(s):  
Brown Algae ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase ◽  
Decarboxylase Activity ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Morganella Morganii ◽  
Inhibition Of Growth ◽  
Histamine Production ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase Activity

Histidine, Lysine and Ornithine Decarboxylase Bacteria in Spanish Salted Semi-preserved Anchovies

1994 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 784-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. RODRIGUEZ-JEREZ ◽  
M. T. MORA-VENTURA ◽  
E. I. LOPEZ-SABATER ◽  
M. HERNANDEZ-HERRERO
Keyword(s):  
Histidine Decarboxylase ◽  
Food Poisoning ◽  
Decarboxylase Activity ◽  
Morganella Morganii ◽  
False Negatives ◽  
Histamine Production ◽  
Efficient Test ◽  
Number Of Microorganisms ◽  
Bacillus Spp ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase Activity

We have studied the histidine decarboxylase activity in 118 strains of bacteria isolated from commercial samples of Spanish semi-preserved anchovies. The lysine and ornithine qualitative decarboxylase activity was also studied. The microorganism that presented the highest histamine activity was Morganella morganii, with 2123.26 ± 414.00 ppm of histamine after 24 h of incubation at 37°C. Two strains of Bacillus spp. and a strain of Staphylococcus xylosus were isolated with the capacity to form 10.54 and 110.00 ppm of histamine, respectively. However, the histidine decarboxylase activity of Bacillus spp. is not likely to be significant to human health. The microbic species with capacity to form histamine and those with capacity to form other biogenic amines were similar. Therefore, the prevention of the proliferation of microorganisms able to form histamine would also mean avoiding amine accumulation that leads to histamine food poisoning. The Niven medium was an efficient test to valutate the histamine production of isolated strains after an incubation of 24 h at 37°C and using a backwards technique for quantification and detecting the false positives. This incubation time should be longer (48 h) when Bacillus is detected, with the finality to eliminate false negatives on the initial screening. The application of the enzymic technique for histamine quantification was excellent. In our research, we have observed that the number of microorganisms is an important factor in the accumulation of histamine, but other factors exist which also influence such accumulation, probably depending on the kind of enzyme decarboxylase.

Inhibition of Morganella morganii Histidine Decarboxylase Activity and Histamine Accumulation in Mackerel Muscle Derived from Filipendula ulumaria Extracts

2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
YOKO NITTA ◽  
FUMIKO YASUKATA ◽  
NORITOSHI KITAMOTO ◽  
MIKIKO ITO ◽  
MOTOYOSHI SAKAUE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase ◽  
Food Poisoning ◽  
Decarboxylase Activity ◽  
Morganella Morganii ◽  
Histamine Production ◽  
Tellimagrandin Ii ◽  
Two Parameters ◽  
Phosphate Buffered Saline ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase Activity

ABSTRACT Filipendula ulmaria, also known as meadowsweet, is an herb; its extract was examined for the prevention of histamine production, primarily that caused by contaminated fish. The efficacy of meadowsweet was assessed using two parameters: inhibition of Morganella morganii histidine decarboxylase (HDC) and inhibition of histamine accumulation in mackerel. Ellagitannins from F. ulmaria (rugosin D, rugosin A methyl ester, tellimagrandin II, and rugosin A) were previously shown to be potent inhibitors of human HDC; and in the present work, these compounds inhibited M. morganii HDC, with half maximal inhibitory concentration values of 1.5, 4.4, 6.1, and 6.8 μM, respectively. Application of the extracts (at 2 wt%) to mackerel meat yielded significantly decreased histamine accumulation compared with treatment with phosphate-buffered saline as a control. Hence, F. ulmaria exhibits inhibitory activity against bacterial HDC and might be effective for preventing food poisoning caused by histamine.

Mast cells and histamine concentration in muscle and liver of dystrophic mice

1964 ◽  
Vol 206 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Bois
Keyword(s):  
Mast Cells ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase ◽  
Binding Capacity ◽  
The Other ◽  
Decarboxylase Activity ◽  
Histamine Concentration ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Histamine Binding ◽  
Dystrophic Mice ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase Activity

The distribution of mast cells in muscle and liver of dystrophic mice was studied; histamine and histidine decarboxylase activity was also measured in the same tissues. Mast cells were significantly more numerous in dystrophic muscles. On the other hand, very few cells could be counted in the liver of either control or dystrophic animals. Histamine concentration was higher in muscle and liver of dystrophic mice; no visible increase in histidine decarboxylase activity could be measured by the methods used. It is concluded that histamine-binding capacity is increased in some tissues of dystrophic mice.

Regulation of rat stomach histidine decarboxylase activity by the serum gastrin concentration

1973 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Håkanson ◽  
G. Liedberg ◽  
J. Oscarson ◽  
J. F. Rehfeld ◽  
F. Stadil
Keyword(s):  
Histidine Decarboxylase ◽  
Serum Gastrin ◽  
Decarboxylase Activity ◽  
Rat Stomach ◽  
Serum Gastrin Concentration ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase Activity

Elevation of histidine decarboxylase activity in skeletal muscles and stomach in mice by stress and exercise

2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (6) ◽  
pp. R2042-R2047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Ayada ◽  
Makoto Watanabe ◽  
Yasuo Endo
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Skeletal Muscles ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase ◽  
Muscle Tension ◽  
The Other ◽  
Decarboxylase Activity ◽  
Gastric Hemorrhage ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Cold Restraint ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase Activity

The effects of different types of stress (water bathing, cold, restraint, and prolonged walking) on histidine decarboxylase (HDC) activity in masseter, quadriceps femoris, and pectoralis superficial muscles, and in the stomach were examined in mice. All of these stresses elevated gastric HDC activity. Although water bathing, in which muscle activity was slight, was sufficiently stressful to produce gastric hemorrhage and to increase gastric HDC activity, it produced no detectable elevation of HDC activity in any of the muscles examined. The other stresses all elevated HDC activity in all three muscles. We devised two methods of restraint, one accompanied by mastication and the other not. The former elevated HDC activity in the masseter muscle, but the latter did not. These results suggest that 1) HDC activity in the stomach is an index of responses to stress, 2) the elevation of HDC activity in skeletal muscles during stress is induced partly or wholly by muscle activity and/or muscle tension, and 3) stress itself does not always induce an elevation of HDC activity in skeletal muscles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document