Assessment of Evaluation Methods for Prediction and Classifications of Consumer Risk in the Credit Industry

Author(s):  
Satish Nargundkar ◽  
Jennifer Lewis Priestley

In this chapter, we examine and compare the most prevalent modeling techniques in the credit industry, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Analysis and the emerging technique of Neural Network modeling. K-S Tests and Classification Rates are typically used in the industry to measure the success in predictive classification. We examine those two methods and a third, ROC Curves, to determine if the method of evaluation has an influence on the perceived performance of the modeling technique. We found that each modeling technique has its own strengths, and a determination of the “best” depends upon the evaluation method utilized and the costs associated with misclassification.

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 7661-7671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gholamreza Abdollahzadeh ◽  
Seyed Mojtaba Hashemi ◽  
Hamidreza Tavakoli ◽  
Hosein Rahami

2007 ◽  
Vol 24-25 ◽  
pp. 243-248
Author(s):  
Hao Wu ◽  
Jian Guo Yang ◽  
Xiu Shan Wang

Thermal errors and force-induced errors are two most significant sources of the NC grinding machine inaccuracy. And error compensation technique is an effective way to improve the manufacturing accuracy of the NC machine tools. Effective compensation relies on an accurate error model that can predict the errors exactly during machining. In this paper, a PSO–BP neural network modeling technique has been developed to build the model of the dynamic and highly nonlinear thermal errors and grinding force induced errors. The PSO–BP neural network modeling technique not only enhances the prediction accuracy of the model but also reduces the training time of the neural networks. The radial error of a grinding machine has been reduced from 27 to 8μmafter compensating its thermal error and force-induced error in this paper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document