Organizational Cognition in the Industrial Case Study

2010 ◽  
pp. 122-132
Author(s):  
Farley Simon Nobre ◽  
Andrew M. Tobias ◽  
David S. Walker
Keyword(s):  
Process Improvement ◽  
Capability Maturity Model ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Process Maturity ◽  
Industrial Case Study ◽  
Organizational Cognition ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Organization Process ◽  
And Performance

This chapter is concerned with the implementation of The Capability Maturity Model in the organization of study. In this application, we define measures of organization process improvement and we propose correlations between them and organizational cognition. Among these measures are included organization process maturity, capability, and performance. Therefore, we define correlations between organizational cognition and organization process maturity, and also between organizational cognition and organization process capability and performance. From such correlations, we also define an association between organizational cognition and organizational learning. Hence, we outline new directions to the development of approaches to assess, to evaluate and to measure the degree of organizational cognition from appraisal methods of The Capability Maturity Model and of other organization process improvement models. Moreover, Chapter IX is complemented by Appendix I which summarizes concepts and characteristics about the five maturity levels of The Capability Maturity Model.

Capability/maturity based model for logistics processes assessment

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachid Benmoussa ◽  
Charkaoui Abdelkabir ◽  
Achraf Abd ◽  
Marouane Hassou
Keyword(s):  
Capability Maturity Model ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Industrial Case Study ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Distribution Logistics ◽  
Industrial Level ◽  
Logistics Process

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study how a general standardized processes assessment capability/maturity model, such as Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), can be combined to a standardized benchmark of logistics processes best practices, such as FD X50-604, to propose a new approach that evaluates logistics processes capability/maturity. Design/methodology/approach – First, an analysis study of CMMI model and X50-604 standard is performed. In order to prove their coherence, a deep comparative analysis of CMMI and X50-604 practices is conducted. As illustration, the paper focuses on a particular application of this approach to evaluate capability/maturity of distribution logistics activities. An industrial case study that aims the validation of this particular application is finally conducted in a furniture company. Findings – The authors estimate that the paper findings provide an operational guide for industrials to evaluate their distribution processes that is a practical, verifiable, repeatable and extensible to other logistics process areas and an interesting opportunity to evolve the standard FD X50-604 regarding CMMI requirements to assess capability/maturity of logistics processes. Originality/value – In general, the few capability/maturity-driven models analyzed in literature present some limits that do not allow their diffusion in the industrial level, especially in logistics. This study proposes a new approach based on standards that provide an operational guide for industrials to evaluate their distribution processes based on capability/maturity concept.

scholarly journals Investigating Process Maturity Modeling as an Advertising Process Improvement Paradigm

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Daniel Adrian Doss ◽  
Russ Henley ◽  
Qiuqi Hong ◽  
Trey Pickett
Keyword(s):  
Process Improvement ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Service Marketing ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Maturity Level ◽  
Process Maturity ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Product Marketing ◽  
Marketing Firms ◽  
First Maturity

Summary This article examined a variant of the Capability Maturity Model integrated (CMMi) through the lens of advertising process improvement. The population and sample were taken from a national array of U.S. marketing organizations. Using ANOVA, a 0.05 significance level, and a stratification of service marketing organizations versus product marketing organizations, the study showed a statistically significant difference (F(1, 304) = 4.03; p = 0.04; ω2 = 0.00) regarding the hypothesis representing the notion that processes were potentially sporadic, chaotic, and ad hoc. This notion corresponded to the first maturity level of the examined process maturity framework. With respect to the Likert-scale data representing the first maturity level, the successive means analysis showed that both service marketing firms (M = 2.99) and product marketing firms (M = 2.74) reported neutrality regarding whether processes were deemed sporadic, chaotic, and ad hoc. Thus, the respondents perceived no evidence of the first maturity level among the queried work settings. Future studies may examine different stratifications of marketing firms (e.g., for-profit versus non-profit; domestic versus international; and so on) to better explore the proposed advertising maturity model.

Benefits of CMM and CMMI-Based Software Process Improvement

2014 ◽  
pp. 1385-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged Abdullah ◽  
Rodina Ahmad ◽  
Lee Sai Peck ◽  
Zarinah Mohd Kasirun ◽  
Fahad Alshammari
Keyword(s):  
Process Improvement ◽  
Software Process ◽  
Software Process Improvement ◽  
Capability Maturity Model ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Software Products ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Development Organizations ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
Maintenance Activities

Software Process Improvement (SPI) has become the survival key of numerous software development organizations who want to deliver their products cheaper, faster, and better. A software process ultimately describes the way that organizations develop their software products and supporting services; meanwhile, SPI on the other hand, is the act of changing the software process and maintenance activities. This chapter purposefully describes the benefits of software process improvement. The Capability Maturity Model (CMM) and the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) are briefly surveyed and extensively discussed. Prior literature on the benefits and impacts of CMM and CMMI-based software process improvement is also highlighted.

Requirements Engineering Process Improvement and Related Models

2011 ◽  
pp. 18-33
Author(s):  
Badariah Solemon ◽  
Shamsul Sahibuddin ◽  
Abdul Azim Abd Ghani
Keyword(s):  
Requirements Engineering ◽  
Process Improvement ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Capability Maturity Model ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Engineering Process ◽  
Principal Characteristics ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Requirements Engineering Process

Requirements Engineering (RE) is a key discipline in software development, and several standards and models are available to help assess and improve RE processes. However, different standards and models can also help achieve different improvement goals. Thus, organizations are challenged to select these standards and models to best suit their specific context and available resources. This chapter presents a review of selected RE-specific and generic process improvement models that are available in the public domain. The review aims to provide preliminary information that might be needed by organizations in selecting these models. The chapter begins with analyses of how RE maturity is addressed in the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) for Development. Then, it describes the principal characteristics of, and the assessment and improvement framework applied in four RE-specific process assessment and improvement models: the Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide (REGPG), the Requirements Engineering Process Maturity(REPM), the Requirements Capability Maturity Model (R-CMM), and the Market-Driven Requirements Engineering Process Model (MDREPM). This chapter also examines the utility and lesson learned of these models.

scholarly journals The Capability Maturity Model as an Industrial Process Improvement Model

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Doss ◽  
Rebecca Goza ◽  
Raymond Tesiero ◽  
Balakrishna Gokaraju ◽  
David H. McElreath
Keyword(s):  
Process Improvement ◽  
Industrial Process ◽  
Capability Maturity Model ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Capability Maturity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document