Management of Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Bleeding on Oral Anticoagulation Therapy-Role of Left Atrial Appendage Closure, Octreotide and more.

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is a major cause of embolic stroke. In patients with hereditary bleeding disorders such as haemophilia, management of AF particularly anticoagulation can be quite challenging. Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an emerging option in AF patients who are not eligible for oral anticoagulation therapy because of contraindications or high bleeding risk. Case summary A 67-year-old man with permanent AF and haemophilia was referred for further evaluation of our cardiology clinic by his primary haematologist. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was estimated to be 3 and the HAS-BLED score was 3. Due to high risk of bleeding, we decided to perform percutaneous LAA closure instead of oral anticoagulation. Pre-procedural cardiac computerized tomography angiography and transoesophageal echocardiography were performed for measurements of LAA dimensions and exclude LAA thrombus. Percutaneous LAA occlusion was performed using a 28-mm AmplatzerTM AmuletTM device. The final result was excellent without significant residual leak, pericardial effusion, and embolic complication. Clopidogrel 75 mg/day and aspirin 81 mg/day for 1 month with adequate FVIII prophylaxis and then only aspirin 81 mg/day for 2 months were recommended. No antiplatelet was given after 3 months. The patient did not report any thrombotic or haemorrhagic adverse events and there were no complications related to implanted device after 1 year of follow-up. Discussion In patients with hereditary bleeding disorders such as haemophilia, management of AF particularly anticoagulation can be quite challenging. In this report, we present a case of percutaneous LAA occlusion using AmplatzerTM AmuletTM device in a patient who has haemophilia and permanent AF. LAA closure has the potential to be more cost effective as compared to oral anticoagulation therapy due to lesser necessity of clotting factor infusion.

Download Full-text

Combining left atrial appendage closure and catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: 2-year outcomes from a multinational registry

EP Europace ◽

10.1093/europace/euz286 ◽

2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Karen P Phillips ◽

Aleksandr Romanov ◽

Sergey Artemenko ◽

Richard J Folkeringa ◽

Tamas Szili-Torok ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Catheter Ablation ◽

Oral Anticoagulation ◽

Left Atrial ◽

Stroke Risk ◽

Left Atrial Appendage ◽

Atrial Appendage ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Abstract Aims Clinical practice guidelines do not recommend discontinuation of long-term oral anticoagulation in patients with a high stroke risk after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with Watchman has emerged as an alternative to long-term anticoagulation for patients accepting of the procedural risks. We report on the long-term outcomes of combining catheter ablation procedures for AF and LAAC from multicentre registries. Methods and results Data were pooled from two prospective, real-world Watchman LAAC registries running in parallel in Europe/Middle-East/Russia (EWOLUTION) and Asia/Australia (WASP) between 2013 and 2015. Of the 1140 patients, 142 subjects at 11 centres underwent a concomitant AF ablation and LAAC procedure. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.4 ± 1.4 and HAS-BLED score 1.5 ± 0.9. Successful LAAC was achieved in 99.3% of patients. The 30-day device and/or procedure-related serious adverse event rate was 2.1%. After a mean follow-up time of 726 ± 91 days, 92% of patients remained off oral anticoagulation. The rates of the composite endpoint of ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic thromboembolism were 1.09 per 100 patient-years (100-PY); and for non-procedural major bleeding were 1.09 per 100-PY. These represent relative reductions of 84% and 70% vs. expected rates per risk scores. Conclusion The long-term outcomes from these international, multicentre registries show efficacy for all-cause stroke prevention and a significant reduction in late bleeding events in a population of high stroke risk post-ablation patients who have been withdrawn from oral anticoagulation.

Download Full-text