scholarly journals New product development in small and medium-sized technology based companies: a multiple case study

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 35242
Author(s):  
Eduardo Gomes Salgado ◽  
Valério Antonio Pamplona Salomon ◽  
Carlos Henrique Pereira Mello ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Sanches da Silva
1969 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Frahm ◽  
David C Ireland ◽  
Damian Hine

For most companies in the biotechnology industry, the core business is new product development (NPD). Indeed, there are still very few companies that have products that have reached the market. Research into NPD in biotechnology companies has largely focussed on success factors rather than the processes of NPD. One area receiving limited attention is the role of organisational communication in NPD. The authors of this study address this oversight in undertaking a multiple case study analysis of internal and external communication in NPD processes in biotechnology. The resultant framework for communication in NPD in biotechnology companies combines both structural and processual elements of communication. The authors found that the process of communication in NPD is essentially an information seeking and uncertainty reduction activity that occurs through both the internal and external environments of the firm. The framework is a hybrid of cross-functional, decision stage and network models.


2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferrie E. A. van Echtelt ◽  
Finn Wynstra ◽  
Arjan J. van Weele ◽  
Geert Duysters

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 1550010 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEXANDER BREM ◽  
FLORIAN FREITAG

A rich body of literature has emerged from research on Western new product development (NPD). However, the impact of country- and culture-specific influences on these processes has not been examined in detail yet. Hence, this study identifies the differences in NPD practices between the Indian and German research and development (R&D) subsidiaries of multinational companies (MNCs). Data have been generated by interviews with R&D executives in both countries across multiple cases. The study samples strategic, organisational, and operational aspects and indicates differences in process coordination, reward systems, NPD creativity techniques, market orientation, and the average age of NPD teams. Other aspects, such as top management support, the use of structured NPD processes, and the use of heterogeneous NPD teams, show no substantial differences between the countries. Our findings suggest that, while some aspects are universally applicable across cultural frontiers, Western companies must understand India's different expectations regarding NPD and adjust their practices accordingly.


Author(s):  
J Poolton ◽  
I Barclay

There are few studies that have found an adequate means of assessing firms based on their specific needs for a concurrent engineering (CE) approach. Managers interested in introducing CE have little choice but to rely on their past experiences of introducing change. Using data gleaned from a nine month case study, a British-wide survey and a series of in-depth interviews, this paper summarizes the findings of a research study that examines how firms orientate themselves towards change and how they go about introducing CE to their operations. The data show that there are many benefits to introducing CE and that firms differ with respect to their needs for the CE approach. A tentative means to assess CE ‘needs’ is proposed which is based on the level of complexity of goods produced by firms. The method is currently being developed and extended to provide an applications-based framework to assist firms to improve their new product development performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document