A Link Evaluation Method Employing Statistical Means of Received Signal Strength Indicator and Link Quality Indicator for Wireless Sensor Networks

2013 ◽  
Vol 470 ◽  
pp. 722-728
Author(s):  
Xuan Jie Ning ◽  
Hai Zhao ◽  
Mao Fan Yang ◽  
Hua Feng Chai

This paper is concerned with a wireless receiving link evaluation method using statistical means of received signal strength indicator (RSSI) and link quality indicator (LQI) based on the IEEE 802.15.4 protocol for wireless sensor networks. Traditional methods using single RSSI and single LQI based on the IEEE 802.11 protocol have the disadvantage of the inaccurate evaluation. In this paper, we carry out a quantitative emulation experiment via computing statistical means of RSSI and LQI based on wireless sensor networks protocol of IEEE 802.15.4. Tested numerical values are analyzed using MATLAB and SPSS by defining the wireless link evaluation sensitivity. Result curves of RSSI to packet reception rate (PRR) and LQI to PRR we finally derive are shown that statistical means of RSSI and LQI can obtain the status information of receiving links more accurately, compared with the traditional wireless link evaluation using single RSSI and single LQI.

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (19) ◽  
pp. 4179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stelian Dolha ◽  
Paul Negirla ◽  
Florin Alexa ◽  
Ioan Silea

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) are widely used in different monitoring systems. Given the distributed nature of WSN, a constantly increasing number of research studies are concentrated on some important aspects: maximizing network autonomy, node localization, and data access security. The node localization and distance estimation algorithms have, as their starting points, different information provided by the nodes. The level of signal strength is often such a starting point. A system for Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) acquisition has been designed, implemented, and tested. In this paper, experiments in different operating environments have been conducted to show the variation of Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) metric related to distance and geometrical orientation of the nodes and environment, both indoor and outdoor. Energy aware data transmission algorithms adjust the power consumed by the nodes according to the relative distance between the nodes. Experiments have been conducted to measure the current consumed by the node depending on the adjusted transmission power. In order to use the RSSI values as input for distance or location detection algorithms, the RSSI values can’t be used without intermediate processing steps to mitigate with the non-linearity of the measured values. The results of the measurements confirmed that the RSSI level varies with distance, geometrical orientation of the sensors, and environment characteristics.


Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (18) ◽  
pp. 5327
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Yu Xia ◽  
Daqing Zheng ◽  
Jian Xie ◽  
Rong Luo ◽  
...  

Hardware-based link quality estimators (LQEs) in wireless sensor networks generally use physical layer parameters to estimate packet reception ratio, which has advantages of high agility and low overhead. However, many existing studies didn’t consider the impacts of environmental changes on the applicability of these estimators. This paper compares the performance of typical hardware-based LQEs in different environments. Meanwhile, aiming at the problematic Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) calculation used in existing studies, a more reasonable calculation method is proposed. The results show that it is not accurate to estimate the packet reception rate using the communication distance, and it may be useless when the environment changes. Meanwhile, the fluctuation range of the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) and SNR will be affected and that of Link Quality Indicator (LQI) is almost unchanged. The performance of RSSI based LQEs may degrade when the environment changes. Fortunately, this degradation is mainly caused by the change of background noise, which could be compensated conveniently. The best environmental adaptability is gained by LQI and SNR based LQEs, as they are almost unaffected when the environment changes. Moreover, LQI based LQEs are more accurate than SNR based ones in the transitional region. Nevertheless, compared with SNR, the fluctuation range of LQI is much larger, which needs a larger smoothing window to converge. In addition, the calculation of LQI is typically vendor-specific. Therefore, the tradeoff between accuracy, agility, and convenience should be considered in practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document