Machine Learning Tools in Machinery Faults Diagnosis: A Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 575 ◽  
pp. 833-836
Author(s):  
K.H. Hui ◽  
Lim Meng Hee ◽  
M. Salman Leong

Machinery faults can be detected by various signal processing tools; however, they require human expertise to achieve maximum success. Machine learning tools can help to achieve automatic machinery-faults diagnosis. This paper provides a brief review of the most common machine learning tools.

Nowadays, signal processing is very common in machine learning. Tools like MATLAB and PRAAT made this really easy. Best example is google search using voice, this can be mostly beneficial for illiterate people and children. I have collected the sample of speech of 160 people of different age group, different genders, and at different and constant time as databases and then these databases are analysed.. Each database consists of samples of human speech uttering the same first 10 alphabets of hindi varnamala .I have used two parameters i.e. formants and intensity for analysing the results of database.I have also characterized it into the form of constant time and variant time. Our aim is to identify the voices of a person on the basis of age and gender through different paremeters like frequency and formants


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 184-190
Author(s):  
Himani Maheshwari ◽  
Pooja Goswami ◽  
Isha Rana

2021 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 103181
Author(s):  
Jagadish Timsina ◽  
Sudarshan Dutta ◽  
Krishna Prasad Devkota ◽  
Somsubhra Chakraborty ◽  
Ram Krishna Neupane ◽  
...  

i-com ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-32
Author(s):  
Daniel Buschek ◽  
Charlotte Anlauff ◽  
Florian Lachner

Abstract This paper reflects on a case study of a user-centred concept development process for a Machine Learning (ML) based design tool, conducted at an industry partner. The resulting concept uses ML to match graphical user interface elements in sketches on paper to their digital counterparts to create consistent wireframes. A user study (N=20) with a working prototype shows that this concept is preferred by designers, compared to the previous manual procedure. Reflecting on our process and findings we discuss lessons learned for developing ML tools that respect practitioners’ needs and practices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 102577
Author(s):  
Yang Zhou ◽  
Chaoyang Chen ◽  
Mark Cheng ◽  
Yousef Alshahrani ◽  
Sreten Franovic ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mythili K. ◽  
Manish Narwaria

Quality assessment of audiovisual (AV) signals is important from the perspective of system design, optimization, and management of a modern multimedia communication system. However, automatic prediction of AV quality via the use of computational models remains challenging. In this context, machine learning (ML) appears to be an attractive alternative to the traditional approaches. This is especially when such assessment needs to be made in no-reference (i.e., the original signal is unavailable) fashion. While development of ML-based quality predictors is desirable, we argue that proper assessment and validation of such predictors is also crucial before they can be deployed in practice. To this end, we raise some fundamental questions about the current approach of ML-based model development for AV quality assessment and signal processing for multimedia communication in general. We also identify specific limitations associated with the current validation strategy which have implications on analysis and comparison of ML-based quality predictors. These include a lack of consideration of: (a) data uncertainty, (b) domain knowledge, (c) explicit learning ability of the trained model, and (d) interpretability of the resultant model. Therefore, the primary goal of this article is to shed some light into mentioned factors. Our analysis and proposed recommendations are of particular importance in the light of significant interests in ML methods for multimedia signal processing (specifically in cases where human-labeled data is used), and a lack of discussion of mentioned issues in existing literature.


2021 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 102353
Author(s):  
Amber Grace Young ◽  
Ann Majchrzak ◽  
Gerald C. Kane

IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Hayssam Dahrouj ◽  
Rawan Alghamdi ◽  
Hibatallah Alwazani ◽  
Sarah Bahanshal ◽  
Alaa Alameer Ahmad ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document