scholarly journals Robust Design of a Smart Structure under Manufacturing Uncertainty via Nonsmooth PDE-Constrained Optimization

2018 ◽  
Vol 885 ◽  
pp. 131-144
Author(s):  
Philip Kolvenbach ◽  
Stefan Ulbrich ◽  
Martin Krech ◽  
Peter Groche

We consider the problem of finding the optimal shape of a force-sensing element which is integrated into a tubular structure. The goal is to make the sensor element sensitive to specific forces and insensitive to other forces. The problem is stated as a PDE-constrained minimization program with both nonconvex objective and nonconvex constraints. The optimization problem depends on uncertain parameters, because the manufacturing process of the structures underlies uncertainty, which causes unwanted deviations in the sensory properties. In order to maintain the desired properties of the sensor element even in the presence of uncertainty, we apply a robust optimization method to solve the uncertain program.The objective and constraint functions are continuous but not differentiable with respect to the uncertain parameters, so that existing methods for robust optimization cannot be applied. Therefore, we consider the nonsmooth robust counterpart formulated in terms of the worst-case functions, and show that subgradients can be computed efficiently. We solve the problem with a BFGS--SQP method for nonsmooth problems recently proposed by Curtis, Mitchell and Overton.

Author(s):  
Todd Letcher ◽  
M.-H. Herman Shen

A multi-objective robust optimization framework that incorporates a robustness index for each objective has been developed in a bi-level approach. The top level of the framework consists of the standard optimization problem formulation with the addition of a robustness constraint. The bottom level uses the Worst Case Sensitivity Region (WCSR) concept previously developed to solve single objective robust optimization problems. In this framework, a separate robustness index for each objective allows the designer to choose the importance of each objective. The method is demonstrated on a commonly studied two-bar truss structural optimization problem. The results of the problem demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of the multiple robustness index capabilities added to this framework. A multi-objective genetic algorithm, NSGA-II, is used in both levels of the framework.


Author(s):  
Jyh-Cheng Yu ◽  
Kosuke Ishii

Abstract This paper describes a robust optimization methodology for design involving either complex simulations or actual experiments. The proposed procedure optimizes the worst case response that consists of a weighted sum of expected mean and response variance. The estimation scheme for expected mean and variance adopts the modified 3-point Gauss quadrature integration to assure superior accuracy for systems with significant nonlinear effects. We apply the proposed method to the robust design of geometric parameters of heat treated parts to minimize the cost of post heat treatment operations. The paper investigates the major factors influencing geometric distortions due to heat treatment and the rules of thumb in design. The study focuses on relating dimensional distortion to the design of part geometry. To illustrate the utility of the proposed method, we present the formulation of a case study on allocation of dimensions of preheat treated (green) shafts to minimize the cost of post heat treatment operations. The final result is not presented yet pending the completion of further experiments.


Author(s):  
Hae Chang Gea ◽  
Xing Liu ◽  
Euihark Lee ◽  
Limei Xu

In this paper, topology optimization under multiple independent loadings with uncertainty is presented. In engineering practice, load uncertainty can be found in many applications. From the literature, researchers have focused mainly on problems containing only a single uncertain external load. However, such idealistic problems may not be very useful in engineering practice. Problems involving multi-loadings with uncertainty are more commonly found in engineering applications. This paper presents a method to solve a system which contains multiple independent loadings with load uncertainty. First, a two-level optimization problem is formulated. The upper level problem is a typical topology optimization problem to minimize the mean compliance in the design using the worst case conditions. The lower level optimization problem is to solve for the worst loadings corresponding to the critical structure response. At the lower level formulation, an unknown-but-bounded model is used to define uncertain loadings. There are two challenges in finding the worst loading case: non-convexity and multi-loadings. The non-convexity problem is addressed by reformulating the problem as an inhomogeneous eigenvalue problem by applying the KKT optimality conditions and the multi-uncertain loadings problem is solved by an iterative method. After the worst loadings are generated, the upper level problem can be solved by a general topology optimization method. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by numerical examples.


Author(s):  
Eliot Rudnick-Cohen ◽  
Jeffrey W. Herrmann ◽  
Shapour Azarm

Feasibility robust optimization techniques solve optimization problems with uncertain parameters that appear only in their constraint functions. Solving such problems requires finding an optimal solution that is feasible for all realizations of the uncertain parameters. This paper presents a new feasibility robust optimization approach involving uncertain parameters defined on continuous domains without any known probability distributions. The proposed approach integrates a new sampling-based scenario generation scheme with a new scenario reduction approach in order to solve feasibility robust optimization problems. An analysis of the computational cost of the proposed approach was performed to provide worst case bounds on its computational cost. The new proposed approach was applied to three test problems and compared against other scenario-based robust optimization approaches. A test was conducted on one of the test problems to demonstrate that the computational cost of the proposed approach does not significantly increase as additional uncertain parameters are introduced. The results show that the proposed approach converges to a robust solution faster than conventional robust optimization approaches that discretize the uncertain parameters.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyan Xu ◽  
Bo Yu ◽  
Wei Liu

We investigate the stochastic linear complementarity problem affinely affected by the uncertain parameters. Assuming that we have only limited information about the uncertain parameters, such as the first two moments or the first two moments as well as the support of the distribution, we formulate the stochastic linear complementarity problem as a distributionally robust optimization reformation which minimizes the worst case of an expected complementarity measure with nonnegativity constraints and a distributionally robust joint chance constraint representing that the probability of the linear mapping being nonnegative is not less than a given probability level. Applying the cone dual theory and S-procedure, we show that the distributionally robust counterpart of the uncertain complementarity problem can be conservatively approximated by the optimization with bilinear matrix inequalities. Preliminary numerical results show that a solution of our method is desirable.


Author(s):  
Omar El Housni ◽  
Vineet Goyal

In this paper, we study the performance of affine policies for a two-stage, adjustable, robust optimization problem with a fixed recourse and an uncertain right-hand side belonging to a budgeted uncertainty set. This is an important class of uncertainty sets, widely used in practice, in which we can specify a budget on the adversarial deviations of the uncertain parameters from the nominal values to adjust the level of conservatism. The two-stage adjustable robust optimization problem is hard to approximate within a factor better than [Formula: see text] even for budget of uncertainty sets in which [Formula: see text] is the number of decision variables. Affine policies, in which the second-stage decisions are constrained to be an affine function of the uncertain parameters provide a tractable approximation for the problem and have been observed to exhibit good empirical performance. We show that affine policies give an [Formula: see text]-approximation for the two-stage, adjustable, robust problem with fixed nonnegative recourse for budgeted uncertainty sets. This matches the hardness of approximation, and therefore, surprisingly, affine policies provide an optimal approximation for the problem (up to a constant factor). We also show strong theoretical performance bounds for affine policy for a significantly more general class of intersection of budgeted sets, including disjoint constrained budgeted sets, permutation invariant sets, and general intersection of budgeted sets. Our analysis relies on showing the existence of a near-optimal, feasible affine policy that satisfies certain nice structural properties. Based on these structural properties, we also present an alternate algorithm to compute a near-optimal affine solution that is significantly faster than computing the optimal affine policy by solving a large linear program.


Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 211
Author(s):  
Lijun Xu ◽  
Yijia Zhou ◽  
Bo Yu

In this paper, we focus on a class of robust optimization problems whose objectives and constraints share the same uncertain parameters. The existing approaches separately address the worst cases of each objective and each constraint, and then reformulate the model by their respective dual forms in their worst cases. These approaches may result in that the value of uncertain parameters in the optimal solution may not be the same one as in the worst case of each constraint, since it is highly improbable to reach their worst cases simultaneously. In terms of being too conservative for this kind of robust model, we propose a new robust optimization model with shared uncertain parameters involving only the worst case of objectives. The proposed model is evaluated for the multi-stage logistics production and inventory process problem. The numerical experiment shows that the proposed robust optimization model can give a valid and reasonable decision in practice.


Author(s):  
Tingting Xia ◽  
Mian Li

Abstract Multi-objective optimization problems (MOOPs) with uncertainties are common in engineering design. To find robust Pareto fronts, multi-objective robust optimization (MORO) methods with inner–outer optimization structures usually have high computational complexity, which is a critical issue. Generally, in design problems, robust Pareto solutions lie somewhere closer to nominal Pareto points compared with randomly initialized points. The searching process for robust solutions could be more efficient if starting from nominal Pareto points. We propose a new method sequentially approaching to the robust Pareto front (SARPF) from the nominal Pareto points where MOOPs with uncertainties are solved in two stages. The deterministic optimization problem and robustness metric optimization are solved in the first stage, where nominal Pareto solutions and the robust-most solutions are identified, respectively. In the second stage, a new single-objective robust optimization problem is formulated to find the robust Pareto solutions starting from the nominal Pareto points in the region between the nominal Pareto front and robust-most points. The proposed SARPF method can reduce a significant amount of computational time since the optimization process can be performed in parallel at each stage. Vertex estimation is also applied to approximate the worst-case uncertain parameter values, which can reduce computational efforts further. The global solvers, NSGA-II for multi-objective cases and genetic algorithm (GA) for single-objective cases, are used in corresponding optimization processes. Three examples with the comparison with results from the previous method are presented to demonstrate the applicability and efficiency of the proposed method.


2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliot Rudnick-Cohen ◽  
Jeffrey W. Herrmann ◽  
Shapour Azarm

Abstract Feasibility robust optimization techniques solve optimization problems with uncertain parameters that appear only in their constraint functions. Solving such problems requires finding an optimal solution that is feasible for all realizations of the uncertain parameters. This paper presents a new feasibility robust optimization approach involving uncertain parameters defined on continuous domains. The proposed approach is based on an integration of two techniques: (i) a sampling-based scenario generation scheme and (ii) a local robust optimization approach. An analysis of the computational cost of this integrated approach is performed to provide worst-case bounds on its computational cost. The proposed approach is applied to several non-convex engineering test problems and compared against two existing robust optimization approaches. The results show that the proposed approach can efficiently find a robust optimal solution across the test problems, even when existing methods for non-convex robust optimization are unable to find a robust optimal solution. A scalable test problem is solved by the approach, demonstrating that its computational cost scales with problem size as predicted by an analysis of the worst-case computational cost bounds.


Author(s):  
Tingting Xia ◽  
Mian Li

Abstract Multi-objective optimization problems (MOOPs) with uncertainties are common in engineering design problems. To find the robust Pareto fronts, multi-objective robust optimization methods with inner-outer optimization structures generally have high computational complexity, which is always an important issue to address. Based on the general experience, robust Pareto solutions usually lie somewhere near the nominal Pareto points. Starting from the obtained nominal Pareto points, the search process for robust solutions could be more efficient. In this paper, we propose a method that sequentially approaching to the robust Pareto front (SARPF) from the nominal Pareto points. MOOPs are solved by the SARPF in two optimization stages. The deterministic optimization problem and the robustness metric optimization problem are solved in the first stage, and nominal Pareto solutions and the robust-most solutions can be found respectively. In the second stage, a new single-objective robust optimization problem is formulated to find the robust Pareto solutions starting from the nominal Pareto points in the region between the nominal Pareto front and the robust-most points. The proposed SARPF method can save a significant amount of computation time since the optimization process can be performed in parallel at each stage. Vertex estimation is also applied to approximate the worst-case uncertain parameter values which can save computational efforts further. The global solvers, NSGA-II for the multi-objective case and genetic algorithm (GA) for the single-objective case, are used in corresponding optimization processes. Two examples with comparison to a previous method are presented for the applicability and efficiency demonstration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document